Skip to main content

Is this Deja Vu or does it just Feel that Way?

 I know things take a while for deals to be finalized but it just feels like there has never a point in time where the talk is not of how they, or she/he, are/is ready to step into a spotlight, do something, may be paid for it and slay the opposition which doesn't appear to be exist in these articles.  The deals are always what others would drool over.  And oddly often very vague on details other than big money.  And endless opportunities in all directions.  These articles seem to be sprinkled everywhere like glitter.  It's always glory and money around the next corner.  The next deal.  That's the one which will pay out without mention of the last one.  Rinse.  Repeat.

It started with the same kind of talk when they left the royal family.  It was/is always how much money is possible and that the choices are wonderful for them.  Maybe that is why it feels like this is a lecture to us and not conversation with us.  At this point, I think we know the talking points pretty well.

The Royal Family does do publicity but it feels like it has a softer or quieter sound to it.  Existed but understated?  While the duo's always seems louder or more of it.  Perhaps it was because they were all new and shiny back then.  Or not.  

But, but, but ... by now, they have a track record of how the various opportunities have played out which never seemed to have the walk into the sunset moment it was projected to have.  So I'm still not certain on what basis all these huge number deals are calculated (new math?).  

And, I suspect, that for a lot of Hollywood, the people who want to meet them to say they have met or try to pitch something, have done so by now.  And if they haven't (by now), probably are not rushing to clear their calendar in hopes there is an opening which can be worked out mutually.  

This time it is where she can come back and influence the world and make rock star money for less than the time of a single band set.  He seems to not be part of the deal.  That's kind of new. It will be interesting to see how that plays out short and long term for both of them.

But the question becomes: Ok. So why is this push different than all the others in the past?  How will that change the profitability this time?  What is that number based on?  and how was that calculated?  Companies appear to be being more careful about how and what they back financially (post Bud Light).  They tend to be looking more for hard numbers to back up the ad people's projections.  

Once you get past that, the problems become what are the long and short term plans?  Who is driving those trains?  And how much is their cut?  Because sustaining something is an endless loop of "what to do next?" as well as "how do I retain freshness?" which needs an experienced eye and has feelers out to  the changing whims of the world.

The other problem is that all these influencers (existing) and the wanna-bes have you in their sights.  And they want your numbers and the money you are bringing in.  You have to be hungrier than they are.

So one needs to be relentless in being driven as each moment or a wrong step could drop you closer to the leading pack on your trail.  You have to be able to move past an oops and lead the public into the next "thing" you are pushing without missing a beat.  You have to handle it well publicly as well as privately with your team.  



 


Comments

Magatha Mistie said…

Mamma Fear

There’s no stopping
our middle aged mum
Egre(i)gious suiting
tight belt round her tum
Dropping into
a homeless cafe
Taking a gift from a kid
child’s play…


Magatha Mistie said…

Jammy Dodgers

Flatter fake, pat’er flake
harry’s your man
Petted and pricked
her known as meghan
Markled by X
sworn secrecy
Put two in the oven
a mystery…




Magatha Mistie said…

@Maneki
Just watched Timothy Spall
in the Sixth Commandment,
harrowing, come a long way
since the “magnificent seven”😉

@WildBoar
My Great nan had bunched up
cross over toes, caused by
ill fitting childhood shoes due to poverty.
What’s madams excuse,
middle class upbringing?










Magatha Mistie said…

@OCGal
@Observant One
Cheers 🥰

Sick of her agenda
addendum
ad nauseam




Girl with a Hat said…
@Magatha,

you nailed it! I knew she reminded me of something - a praying mantis!

What an imagination you have. You are the poet laureate of Markledom.
OCGal said…
@Magatha Mistie,

The fine works you’ve presented today are all top notch, I loved them all, but I marveled and laughed best at these choice multiple meaning lines:

Usual prose
open legged stanza
Repetitious, malicious
pernicious preying mantra…

It is such a gift to read your work. Thank you.

P.S. you nailed it with “Verdi-grease Lubricante…Sheathed in a reptilian green prophylactic…”

P.P.S. what the heck was that excrable tight green gownless evening strap (strapless evening gown) if not a reptilian green prophylactic? You nailed it. Oh, and she was hoping that someone would.

P.P.P.S. If I were as coarse as she, I would point out naughtily that you could’ve spelled Lubricante with a u in place of the a, but you hold yourself to a higher standard than I, which I applaud
snarkyatherbest said…
Magatha awesome and clever as always.

WBBM. oh that terrible person in the wheelchair. did he not know he was in the presence a real live Saint. how dare he not get up and walk from his chair because her mere pretense would have had a miraculous impact on those around. musta been williams fault so no wonder she ran out of there so fast how dare he not walk in her presences

alinor. yes i am sure she will be reading her memoirs to preschoolers just like he did with the bench. and mean princess. catherine made me cry chapter 3 bagging the dumb prince
Her teef are a main topic on SMM. I'm still convinced she had lost at least her natural upper set entirely. It was long ago that the way she `juggled' with them, like horse playing with the bit, reminded me of elderly relatives with uncomfortable plates carrying a full upper set.

When I saw the whole lot drop down into view, and then snap back into position, clinched it for me. Perhaps her ``lovers' felt safer with them out of the way.

It seems she's following the Marquise de Merteuil as we predicted.

O/T sort of - do you ever see the YT films of the atrocious behaviour of tourists at Horse Guards in London? One horse in particular (Arnie, all black) almost has a fan club for the way he enforces his personal space; there's another that even looks for tourists to bite...
Sandie said…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-12537035/AnnaLynne-McCord-Meghan-Markle-90210-x-rated-hysterical.html

One online critic posting as LaNiceGata summed it up: 'She must have forgotten she was BJ girl in that show AFTER she left her briefcase girls stint due to being objectified.'
-----

The entire article is hilarious. She won't own up to who she really is and own the choices she made. She was living with Trevor and did not have to take that role ... !

Meanwhile in New York ...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12537519/Williams-transformation-AMANDA-PLATELL-royal-hunk.html

There are numerous articles swooning over William. The above is just a sample. It all comes down to character, and the dastardly duo have a permanent problem on that front.
Maneki Neko said…
90210 star AnnaLynne McCord opens up about Meghan Markle's VERY X-rated appearance on the hit show - admitting she found it 'hysterical' that Duchess had played 'a little hoe'

Not the publicity * wanted...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-12537035/AnnaLynne-McCord-Meghan-Markle-90210-x-rated-hysterical.html#article-12537035
Sandie said…
I was watching an interview with Victor David Hanson (heavyweight academic and political/social commentator). He actually mentioned TBW and the infamous Oprah interview in the context of privileged elites bemoaning personal slights/grievances in the context of the current state of poverty and homelessness and struggles of the working class and increasingly the struggling middle class. In her voracious appetite for attention, she has made herself one of the elite of Nero's Rome as the city burned and the empire crumbled. Perhaps an extreme comparison, but there is something apt about it. I have come to the conclusion that TBW and her hapless husband are just too stupid to 'read the room' and do not have the capacity to understand the 'room' anyway.

By the way, I am not a huge fan of William's wholesale acceptance of the 'global warming crisis' and the support of billions being given to Ukraine to fight a war that could have been avoided with diplomacy, but he is still way beyond what his brother and spouse are capable of in terms of character and achievements, and he still has 'being king' in his future!
Sandie said…
By the way, I am a huge fan of the Earthshot Prize. Sustainable environmental practices that benefit local communities and the natural world is not new at all, but has never been fully supported as financial profits have been prioritised (recycling for example, has not been supported because it does not make a financial profit ... the worth of reducing garbage dumps does not have financial value so it is not supported).

Apologies for going off topic in what is perhaps a controversial way!

@Maneki Neko
That DM article is pure gold!
Sandie said…
https://the-best-soap-opera-ever.tumblr.com/post/728929750859628544/wow

The crowd that gathered to see William in NYC is quite astonishing. The duo in Montecito must be fuming!
Elskainga said…
⚠️ Warning. Trigger alert:

In Lady C’s latest video, she answers a viewer’s comment about * smelling badly. Lady C said she has heard this from many others who have been around them. I believe Lady C is talking regularly with someone in Germany who has attended the games. Anyway, the smells are BO from sweat, cigarettes and too much perfume. People also commented on her PO. Lady C then says the odors from below the belt and mentions post BOX, slang for pussy. 🤮🤮 I’m a Douchass dontcha know

Oh my word.. Between that short short romper and this smelly gossip gem, * ‘s campaign to become a fashion influencer is a nonstarter! And I couldn’t be happier for her.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ7Kg8x0tW8&list=LL&index=19&t=2719s

Starts @42 minutes 26 seconds

Martha said…
@sandie..heartily agree with your comments re Victor Davis Hanson. Listen to him frequently, but missed that one you mentioned. Will have a listen.
And I also agree with your stance on William inNY, and the global green agenda being forced on us. I could say much much more…
The BO & PO:

Perhaps both of them have a severely damaged sense of smell, thanks to heavy smoking, so they are unaware of their offensive stink. We've commented before that she always looks as if she needs a damn' good wash - and presumably wigs are like hair in the way the filter out dirt and odours from the atmosphere, except that they don't get washed/cleaned/shampooed nearly as often.

Do they assume they exude sweet and holy odours? Rasputin was said to have stunk to high Heaven - my old history teacher said that he gave a new meaning to the phrase `odour of sanctity.

Seriously, could this lack of personal care itself be a sign of mental disorder/brain damage?

I started wondering what might be the worst fate that could befall a raging narcissist and decided it would have to be a seizure that robs him or her of all agency - yet not of the awareness of what had happened. That's hell for anyone but especially a narc, I imagine.
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16nlf2m/uplifting_empowering_photo_has_been_posted_narc/

Seems she took Chris Jackson with her for photos ... another has been released.
Sandie said…
https://archive.ph/2023.09.20-130452/https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/prince-williams-nyc-visit-stark-contrast-prince-harrys-near-catastrophic-paparazzi

An interesting comparison of two brothers in New York.
Maneki Neko said…
@Elskainga

I've just listened to the section of Lady C's video that you mentioned 🙈🙊. It's hard to believe. Does she not shower?? Usually, this lack of personal hygiene is an indication of mental health problems.
Of course, I should have qualified my last post by stating that `the Harkles are a couple of smelly individuals', or wtte, is just an allegation, not yet proved in court. How very remiss of me.
Opus said…
I have often wondered whether the accusation of not smelling nice is doing the work of the advertising agencies for them. Heaven knows why I remember it because I must have been about fourteen when I read it but I recall in Fleming's From Russia With Love, Lt Cdr Bond showering twice on the day of his arrival in Constanti... sorry Istanbul. It is the same with adverts for toothpaste: one does not need to cover the entire brush in the unpleasant tasting stuff; just a little is adequate. Some people find natural perspiration attractive; it is often the cologne's that smells awful. The accusation of not smelling nice is one of the acceptable forms of insult, but in my view no different from insulting someone because of the colour of their hair or skin.

I have a very poor sense of smell.
Maneki Neko said…
Re * being smelly - allegedly - I remembered she has 16 bathrooms. If the rumours are true, they can't be used very often... Is she trying to save the planet by not using water?
Girl with a Hat said…
I just saw the photos of the state dinner for Charles and Camilla.

Camilla looks absolutely great in that blue cape dress.
Rebecca said…
I was taken aback when Lady C addressed the issue of TW’s alleged body odor issues. Perhaps it’s true, but my first thought was that it was someone’s hyperbole taken as gospel.
@Opus
Sorry, I beg to differ.

The difference between commenting on BO and skin colour and the like is that the former is, except in medical cases, almost entirely under one's own control under `normal' circumstances whereas skin colour, disability, age and, until recently, whether one was deemed male or female is not.
GWAH,

Yes, she does - and very appropriate for Versailles.
What is more, it's DIOR!

More smashed crockery...
And the choice of couturier will be appreciated in France as a huge compliment, nothing like the insults of what * did to others designers.

Sound diplomacy too.
Great photo of * wearing Empire line trousers at

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16o88jc/made_me_spit_my_tea/

I imagine it's the only way she can think of to avoid standing on them.
Sandie said…
Her goal is infamy. It's her high. Positive or negative opinion, doesn't matter. Checks socials daily.

She knows (& has known) they cannot compete with top Hollywood talent. We exclusively reported
@barkjack
in 2021 her political aspirations and I'm told plans have not changed!
https://twitter.com/BarkJack_

I am not in total agreement with the above. I think she wants the Oscar and high political office, and does not accept that she is not adequate for either.
Sandie said…
The conversation here is interesting:

https://twitter.com/BarkJack_/status/1704683350303088828

-----
You are right that there are a massive amount of hurdles to overcome for an entry into politics. Nonetheless she has a penchant for carving her own way.
-----
Should MM decide to undertake *some* potential endeavors, legal obligatory course of action entails absolute "severance and disestablishment" from The Crown.
-----
Big reason the BRF can wait this out a while is because they know she CAN'T
Sandie said…
Some nuggets from here:

https://twitter.com/BarkJack_/status/1704677509495718300

Exclusive - WME exec arranges meeting with 2 significant Hollywood Packaging Agents.

WME ponders aloud "What DOES she offer her fanbase"? No one answers.

Agent 1 isn't convinced. "Respect has to come first"
Hollywood is not convinced *yet*. Ouch!

Politics is the next pusher.
-----
REVENGE by Tom Bower is commendable, laudable, praiseworthy (at times) of MM's tenacity, audacity and insatiable drive for fame and infamy, backed by little talent.
-----
Echoing Daily Mail: True. Some 'close' to M&H, (incl. original financial backers) are making distance.

Constant headline-grabbing crabbing off-puts Hollywood.

Pair are also pulling the rug out from themselves: failing their self imposed 'auditions'. They're really on their own.
-----
I was clutching my non existent pearls and rolling over those high cut shorts on the golf cart.

My hand is back over my mouth again just thinking about it. The fashion was disgraceful. SORRY to say.
-----
Its tragically apparent. Hollywood knows it.

They cannot force what isn't there. Heck, one can be beautiful or an OK actor. But there's a certain talent, willingness and appeal that is SO sought after. If it's not there the DOOR is CLOSED. & That's it!
Magatha Mistie said…

Singalong 🎤
Apologies: Sam Cooke
Wonderful World

Coop d’tete

She knew nowt about royalty
She knew nowt about diplomacy
She knew nowt about Daffy Duk
She knew nowt about Freedom book

But she did know
how to try a coup
And to hammer
notches on her screw
What a woeful wanton witch
is she

She knows much about hagiography
She knows much about surrogacy
She knows much about
no knickers or bra
She knows much about
legs piste en garde

But we know
one and one plus two
Doesn’t make her
story true
If DM would follow through
What a Wonderful Day
this would be…

Magatha Mistie said…

@GWAH
I agree, Camilla looks fab
France did Charles proud
Merci Macron 👏 🇫🇷


Magatha Mistie said…

@OCGal
Normally I would change
the a to a u
But recently noticed
doesn’t always get through

Magatha Mistie said…

@snarky
Thank you
Snark & Satire
what’s not to love 😉
Magatha Mistie said…

@Martha
On yer bike
Why are you here
on this site?


Maneki Neko said…
Ladies (and gents)! I know how much you admired *'s outfit at the IG in Düsseldorf. Here is your chance. How to dress like * 😁

FASHION FINDER: These Meghan Markle Invictus Games outfits will make you fall in love with her autumn wardrobe

https://tinyurl.com/45rnhfv7
Opus said…
What a lovely clip of the King alone crossing paths with cyclists on the moors up near Balmoral and engaging the cyclists for a minute in conversation. I assume it was not staged for it certainly looked natural.

How different from his subsequent meeting with President Macron. Those airline steps looked so steep and treacherous I would have come down as on-board ship, backwards. Even so The Queen narrowly avoided a wardrobe malfunction. The King and President Macron appear to be the same height but as one ages one loses height and so Macron must be fairly short. I feel sure both were wearing high heels as was Mme Macron (looking like a cross between Cruela de Ville and a tranny). That has to be a wig. I never had a female school teacher.

I am reminded that at Poitiers on the day before yesterday in the year 1356 The Black Prince took King John the second prisoner. I have visited his tomb - the Black Prince I mean.
abbyh said…
High waisted? photoshop
@abbyh


High waisted - sadly more than likely/


----
Stinky Sussexes;

This isn't the first time this has been mentioned - long ago H was said to smell of alcohol and tobacco smoke. As for * after the foursome walkabout to see the flowers at Windsor and acknowledge those who had come to pay their respects, someone in the crowd, standing near the brave soul who refused to touch *, said she smelled as if she had been drinking (ie heavily.)
Wikipedia gives M.Macron's height as 5'8", HM king Charles 5'10".

Diana also was 5'10 but with heels towered over her husband.

Whether His Maj. has managed to maintain his height is unknown - age is cruel. I and
my other half are in danger of disappearing from view.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16p6tfg/harry_needs_mommegs_permission_to_present_medals/

A short film sequence, 1' 23" long, of H$M awarding medals. It has attracted 31 pages of blistering comments and, as one person says, tells us everything about their relationship. It reminds me of the chap who said,

"I always have the last word -`Yes, dear'".
Sandie said…
https://www.newsweek.com/meghan-markle-podcast-archetypes-legal-filing-trademark-1829074

She has abandoned the attempt to trademark the word Archetypes. Supposedly she is going to continue her podcasting career on another platform. How many dozen people did it take to get those episodes fine? Paid for by Spotify, who also set up a studio for her? Where is she going to find a platform that can give her that?

Basically, I do not believe that she is going to continue the series on another platform.
SwampWoman said…

@Maneki Neko: FASHION FINDER: These Meghan Markle Invictus Games outfits will make you fall in love with her autumn wardrobe

That must have been an AI/artificial intelligence writing that. "Will make you fall in love with" means "appalled by".
SwampWoman said…
sandie said: Basically, I do not believe that she is going to continue the series on another platform.

Say it ain't so! You know my heart will be broken if she doesn't go on YouTube or TikTok or NastyGram to demonstrate how she applies her makeup and does her hair. I, a pale woman (or as pale as I can be after spending a life in Florida) can look like a Nigerian princess just like her! We could go shopping along with her as she picks out clothes that almost fit and are nearly color coordinated! We could all scream "Nooooo!" simultaneously as she picks out the pieces. Then, dear God, she could instruct us on the proper fitting of undergarments.

/I do believe that I could make her a comedy fashion star, but she doesn't have enough money for me to put up with her.
SwampWoman said…
Wild Boar Battle-maid said: This isn't the first time this has been mentioned - long ago H was said to smell of alcohol and tobacco smoke. As for * after the foursome walkabout to see the flowers at Windsor and acknowledge those who had come to pay their respects, someone in the crowd, standing near the brave soul who refused to touch *, said she smelled as if she had been drinking (ie heavily.)

I was wondering. If a person is a heavy drinker/alcoholic, the alcohol smell oozes through the pores and is quite unpleasant. Combine that with stale cigarette smoke and perfume, ugh.
@Swamp Woman - I'm sure you're right about odours oozing out of the pores; I think alcohol can travel from the bloodstream out through the lungs as well, plus what comes out of the apocrine glands.



Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16pi6ww/mmh_just_filed_a_fifth_extension_on_92023_to/

MM&H just filed a fifth extension on (9/20/23) to delay providing the Statement of Use for their Archewell Trademark

-----
the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's application were told to resubmit a "better application" with more information.
-----

What a mess!


Sandie said…
https://twitter.com/BarkJack_/status/1705384944464458195

-----
Today it was confirmed that Prince Harry was in fact, invited to spend HLMTQ's death anniversary with KCIII and family at Balmoral. He snubbed them!
-----
Royalists, & yes, including SUN reported a Balmoral invite to Harry was extended!

I knew about his being treated as a commoner by the Office (going through aides to reach KCIII).

But NEWS to me to learn he was invited & snubbed it! We were awaiting Balmoral invite confirmation.
-----
It appears just Harry was, due to his travel itinerary (he made the stop over) and requested Royal Accommodation which was denied, HOWEVER it was at that point, he was offered the Olive Branch of Balmoral. Which, he petulantly snubbed!
-----
He is Family. Of course they will have him home. Despite all this, he is now a CIVILIAN and handled with the same civilian protocols.
-----

New post for a very intriguing thread from this account ...
Sandie said…
These are the posts by Barkjack about TBW not wanting to return to the UK (IMO when a malignant narc 'messes up' they put their noses in the air and simply ghost instead of apologizing and trying to do better):

-----
SOMETHING happened.

We've known something isn't "right" for months.
Our usual sources are mum, worse, in the dark on it.
We tried bribing the right people. Didn't work.

Now, we open the floor to more suggestion. Yours is most intriguing! :]
-----
We've been investigating this one. It's a doozy.

Why do you think Meghan Markle has not returned to the UK?
-----
The investigation we are doing has spanned several months. It's unclear why she won't go back but it is SOMETHING.

It's a mystery but the moment I can confirm more, I will.
-----
Sandie said…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12551711/Meghan-Harry-Kevin-Costner-Maroon-5-oprah-fundraiser-divorce.html

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were all smiles as they made a surprise appearance at Kevin Costner's 'One805 Live!' charity event for first responders on Friday, held at his $26 million polo field in Santa Barbara.

The fundraising event - where 'last chance' tables cost $12,000 - was hosted at the oceanside estate of Kevin Costner in Summerland and included noteworthy guests, such as Oprah and Katy Perry's parents.

Harry exuded casual yet cool vibes in his black on black ensemble, while Meghan opted for the sophisticated, chic look, in a monochrome jacket with her hair pulled back 'clean-girl' style.

Upon their arrival, the Duke and Duchess - who have just returned from a PDA-packed appearance at the Invictus Games in Germany - were spotted backstage chatting with Costner, his VIP guests, and senior police and firefighting service officials.

Speaking at the event, Costner said: 'Good Afternoon everyone, I get asked a lot by my friends who have no manners ... 'Kev, what's this place cost, what's it worth? I can just simply tell you on a day like today, it's worth every penny.'

'We can celebrate people that you'd maybe never meet, the ones who are the first to rush in,' he added. 'It's a place where I've had a lot of good luck in my life and I try to not put a wall around it.'

Harry and Meghan were introduced onstage as special guests and Meghan presented Kevin with an honorary award - before doing a mini Royal-style walkabout to greet other attendees.

Meghan beamed for the camera throughout the event, while Harry was at times caught staring into the distance with an enigmatic expression.

Following their on stage moment, the couple made their way toward the VIP area where they were stopped by pop singer Katy Perry’s mom and dad and posed for a selfie.

Another influential attendee, Oprah Winfrey, gave a talk on stage.

The talk show host - who conducted the Royal couple's infamous, explosive interview in 2021 - introduced a man named Sam Dudley and his service dog Rhonda in a video which was reposted on One805 Instagram stories.

'Sam, in addition to all the extraordinary things that One805 does, they have a counseling service where they counsel over 700 responders and this year alone prevented 24 suicided,' she said. 'And Sam knows all too well how beneficiary one805 counseling services are.'

As the night unfolded, Harry revealed his dance moves while Meghan engaged in conversation with other attendees.

The couple also walked around the event to greet other distinguished guests and pose for photos.

Following their on stage moment, the couple made their way toward the VIP area where they were stopped by pop singer Katy Perry ’s mom and dad and posed for a selfie.

Following their on stage moment, the couple made their way toward the VIP area where they were stopped by pop singer Katy Perry ’s mom and dad and posed for a selfie.
-----
The article is an odd mish mash if three stories (the duo triumphant at IG and SO in live; the Costner divorce, and some kind of band participating in the event).
Sandie said…
Adjacent topic: filmed by someone in the crowd in New York who had gathered to see William. The amount of security he has around him is astonishing, and the crowd control is impeccable. If the duo in Montecito see this they will be enraged!

https://www.tumblr.com/sarribarri9/728925696882278400?source=share
Sandie said…
@swampwoman
Loved your post... nearly choked on my morning coffee! But so much wisdom in the following:

"I do believe that I could make her a comedy fashion star, but she doesn't have enough money for me to put up with her."

She could indeed make a lot of money being herself and being honest about it, but that one is so much in denial ...! Imagine her as a character in a soap ... the ill-fittung and inapproprate fashion moments, the meaningful itty bitty jewellery, the lies, the grandiosity, the victimhood, the ghosting, the drama, the love bombing and controlling if the hapless husband, the poolside cocktails ... but you are right: no one would want to work with her!
Maneki Neko said…
Harry and Meghan's new campaign to win Hollywood over? Sussexes are all smiles as they are given star billing at Kevin Costner's fundraiser... also attended by their close celebrity allies Oprah and Ellen Degeneres

Another surprise appearance. *is looks pulled together (better than at the IG) and still has a perma grin. Trying to rub shoulders with Hollywood celebs smacks of desperation. 'last chance' tables cost $12,000. I'm not sure what they'll get out of it. Maybe Netflix were in tow.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12551711/Meghan-Harry-Kevin-Costner-Maroon-5-oprah-fundraiser-divorce.html#article-12551711
Magatha Mistie said…

Sackharine Taut

Tied like a sack
herringbone dog blanket
Easily reversed
fancy strait-jacket
Eyes laser focused
mirroring heart and soul
Delirious, deranged
carbon black hole…
Magatha Mistie said…

Claws to the front I see
Joker’s behind me-me
Kev’s not stuck
in the middle
with you…


Sandie said…
Kevin Costner The Bodyguard II starring the Duke and Duchess of SS with Oprah as one of the executive producers? I can believe it ... the storyline is already there.

The exiled royals, cut off from the cruel royal family, denied security protection, and so in love, every project sabotaged by the cruel royal family and British tabloids, plus Racism!

The prince would have to be killed off early, in a car chase (he can't act at all so most of his time on screen will be in the hospital hooked up to life support), and her and her children are under threat so step in ... Kevin Costner the bodyguard, paid for by her dear friend Oprah. The royal children will do cameo appearances. She will provide all her usual acting tricks: crying, the down-to-earth mom, the strong independent woman, the glamorous star, the sex bomb. She is also a humanitarian so she sneaks off to a food kitchen, in disguise, but is recognised so the bodyguard has to save her. And there would be scenes of being chased by dozens of paps hurling insults (what happened to Catherine and Diana), facing a wall of photographers at a glittering humanitarian award ceremony (or will she want to give herself an Oscar?).

Costner is not fan of the royal family and planned a similar movie starring Diana. Plus, he is very charming and a really nice attractive man who knows how to make a movie/series that works. He would charm the impossible duo into being directed by him, in a quiet, strong and very charming way.

Rumours will swirl about an affair between Costner and TBW (his divorce was very timely), which will generate a buzz for the movie/series.

There will be so many slurs and lies about the royal family that the project will cause a lot of trouble and get major media attention.

I came across a video Andrew Bustamante (ex CIA operative) did in which he explains how you can use 'hate' to your advantage. It is a strategy they perhaps use, but mostly to build and sustain a victimhood narrative, and that is not what Andrew has in mind.

https://youtu.be/CxhRMM6nZqU?si=JXlwbdu3DedbYuXu
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16pycwx/harry_in_astonishing_snub_to_charles_after/

Contrary to comments on the thread above, I think Charles did probably extend an invitation for a private visit to Balmoral, to the whole family. No way is TBW going to face the family after what she has done, but will cling to the delusion that she requires a public apology and acknowledgement of wringdoing and special negotiations and ...Hapless has made it quite clear that he will burn every bridge for and do anything his wife asks of him and manipulates him into doing.
Girl with a Hat said…
one of the commenters at the DM on that Kevin Costner benefit story says that there's a video of her at the event trying to pull the microphone from someone's hand. LOL typical
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16q9zl3/who_is_left_for_archewell_staff_is_archewell/

Someone had an in-depth look at who they employ. It is still a lot of people, but the main purpose seems to be PR and general dogsbody for the duo. I am mystified - why do they need PR if they do not have any business to promote? They may be getting freebies but with no social media and not enough high-profile public appearances, merching will not pay well. Is this all money spent on vanity?
Sandie said…
Using a new tool, this blogger tracked social media attention in detail ...

https://www.tumblr.com/ladykinrannoch/729248682539696128/the-duchess-of-chicken-legs?source=share

"There are over 900 unique twitter accounts posting about Chicken Legs... mostly 18 to 34 years of age, or over 55. And its mostly women (and mostly in America). All though a third of the posts are from men! So clearly those men don't find skinny malinky legs all that sexy."
-----

The Markle brand:

https://www.tumblr.com/ladykinrannoch/729177124122066944/dying-markle-brand?source=share

" ... what is the two big spikes in mentions across all platforms?

The first.... January 5 is Harry Spares book specifically related to the dog bowl incident...

and the second big spike is...

the "near catastrophic car chase, that wasn't!"...
other than dog bowls and phantom car chases, it has been a rather dull year...

Even her birthday only garnered 25000 mentions...."
-----
In the second post, she goes on to analysing Catherine and William.

Note that USA has a much larger population so keep that in mind when looking at the stats. More attention in USA should be considered in relation to the size of the population.


Maneki Neko said…
Prince Harry must now give notice if he wants to visit the King and stay at any royal properties, it has emerged, after he was denied a room at Windsor Castle earlier this month.
...
It is believed that Harry planned to stay at Windsor Castle so he could visit the Queen's resting place at St George's Chapel the following day.

However, he was denied his request on the grounds that no properties were available on short notice.

It is believed that Buckingham Palace also told the Duke he would have to put in a 'formal request' to see his father during his visit. It is unclear if King Charles was aware of this correspondence.

According to the Telegraph, Harry, who is due to return to the UK in January, will still be allowed to stay at properties in Windsor going forward, but only if 'suitable warning' is given.


Oh dear! Never mind. The humiliation is complete.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12553075/Prince-Harry-Windsor-Castle-King-Charles.html
Sandie said…
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2023/09/23/prince-harry-notice-royal-estate-windsor-castle-balmoral/

Supposedly hapless wanted to stay at Windsor Castle when he was in the UK but was denied. The excuse was that he had given too short notice that he would be in the UK. He was invited to see the King, who was at Balmoral, but said he did not have time and would have to use a private jet or helicopter to get to and from Balmoral. Papa obviously did not offer the royal helicopter!

What baffles me is why a man who has no job could not find the time to fly commercial to Scotland to see his blood family, then fly commercial to London for the WellChild awards then fly commercial to Germany for the IG.
Sandie said…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12553075/Prince-Harry-Windsor-Castle-King-Charles.html

The same story in the DM.
Sandie said…
This story is quite astonishing:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12553491/Harry-Meghan-duchess-accused-gag-teachers-students-new-york-school.html

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex visited Public School 123 Mahalia Jackson, which is among one of the poorest in New York City, in September 2021.
Meghan, 42, was dressed in a $5,000 suit and Cartier jewelry to read to second-grade students from her picture book The Bench while Harry, 39, sat down with the children.

But advisors from their Archewell foundation demanded the Harlem school sign a clause which banned anyone from making negative comments, according to The Sun.

The request was also related to any posts on social media 'now or in the future'. Sources close to the Archewell foundation have insisted that standard practice was followed.

...

Freedom of information requests have revealed how the couple's advisors at Archewell tried to protect their image.

It also highlights how their team banned four British newspapers from attending an event at the World Trade Center, even though it is a publicly owned building.

Plans for the Sussexes' trip began six months before the event and it was managed by Toya Holness, a member of the couple's PR team.

Archewell representatives emailed the Department of Education three days before the visit to Public School 123.

They requested the 'appearance release' which included the gagging clause and asked them to run it by their lawyers.

Another email from NYC schools press secretary Danielle Filson had asked for the best way to get it all agreed but it is not clear if the Sussexes' request was signed.


Maneki Neko said…
Harry and Meghan are accused of trying to GAG teachers and students at NYC school they visited in 2021 'by prohibiting them from making negative social media posts now or in the future'

The school is among one of the poorest in New York City and * 'was dressed in a $5,000 suit and Cartier jewelry to read to second-grade students from her picture book The Bench'. A school 'where 95 percent of children are classed as suffering economic hardship.' Couldn't read the room as usual. And dictating no one could make negative comments now or in the future! This bordering on insanity.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12553491/amp/Harry-Meghan-duchess-accused-gag-teachers-students-new-york-school.html
Girl with a Hat said…
this is the video of her trying to grab a mike at the Kevin Costner benefit event.

https://twitter.com/hellen3030/status/1705596428024709607
Fifi LaRue said…
While on the plane I had an opportunity to begin reading Spare. JR Moehringer is a gifted writer turning Todger's nasty nasty vitriol into a book that would have been impossible for Todger even to contemplate writing one paragraph. As for Moehringer staying with the Todgers and Mrs. Todger and "Archie" bringing trays of sweets every day,I've known a couple of professional writers and they are professional liars.

Mrs. Todger will never write her book because no publisher will give her $750,000 for a ghostwriter. And if she had a ghostwriter she'd fight the ghost writer every step of the way.

So the Todgers paid $12,000 each to attend Kevin Costner's fundraiser. Who's putting out the PR that Mrs. Todger will star in a remake of The Bodyguard? LOL!
Girl with a Hat said…
Kevin Costner is also represented by WEM.

When Costner accepted something from Hairy, he didn't even look at the traitor or acknowledge him in any way. In fact, Costner's head was down when he was accepting and there was no eye contact between the two.
Sandie said…
@GWAH
The video of her trying to take the mike is hilarious. She kept the smile plastered on her face, but hapless looks kind of grim!

The story about them making people they visit sign something in which they promise not to say anything negative about the duo is perhaps the final nail in their coffin. They seem to have coasted for a while on this strategy to get positive publicity, but that false story started to unravel and there is no stopping it now.

Perhaps I was wrong in believing that the invitation to visit the King at Balmoral would have included her if she had been with him. There would have been strict conditions about no photographs or publicity, but surely the Jing knows that they cannot be trusted? Anyway, I think it is very sad that he has turned his back on his fanily and country in the most nasty way for her. No good can come of it.
Sandie said…
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CxiJJ5wOEWq/

A video of the duo with Costner and the real estate agent. Costner is talking to hapless and doing all the talking. She is talking to the real estate guy and being ignored by Costner.
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16qxvwe/the_teeth_suck_tell/

She really does not know what to do when she is not the centre of attention and dominating the conversation. The expressions on her face are just weird in the video.
Elskainga said…
Meghan, 42, was dressed in a $5,000 suit and Cartier jewelry to read to second-grade students from her picture book The Bench while Harry, 39, sat down with the children.

Not only did the Sussexes put through a gag order on the adults at the school, but she read her pre-school picture book to a bunch of second graders, 7-8 year olds. The Bench is totally age inappropriate and below grade level reading; they must have been so bored. I remember watching the video of her reading to the group of students and thought the kids were so well-behaved.
Of course, illiterate Harry, also in the audience, was enraptured . I can’t believe they had the gall to ask the kids to pay $5 for a copy of her book.

The Archewell team must have been worried about how these two dingbats would play in NYC during their faux-royal tour thus the gag orders. Wow, just wow.
xxxxx said…
So the Todgers paid $12,000 each to attend Kevin Costner's fundraiser. Who's putting out the PR that Mrs. Todger will star in a remake of The Bodyguard? LOL!

Funniest I have heard all week! Just imagining this in my mind. The Bodyguard will be a Royal Protection Officer this time around. His commander will be Idris Alba. This will take place in the UK, Montecito and the streets of LA, in a top of the line EV Range Rover. Megs will be getting it on with the Viagra chomping, Kevin Costner, who will be speaking w full British accent. Perhaps a Cockney accent. Then she works her way up the ladder to Idris, who (as you know) has been promoted as being the next James Bond.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Maneki Neko said…
@Sandie

We both noticed the same articles!
Re. the Tumbler account, never mind*'s chicken legs. What about her great grandparents? This was in the article:

"FYI, I did not know that her great grandparents on Doria's side were brother and sister? Has that been verified?"

Maybe just a rumour.
Sandie said…
@Maneki Neko
That comment about her great grandparents being siblings puzzled me. It was just thrown in with no context or references. I assumed that it was someone just making something up ... the usual online craziness that prople get up to.

That article about getting people to sign some kind of document promising to not say anything negative about them is so crazy that it never occured to me to even speculate about something like that!

A couple of women have just been interviewed on Spectator TV talking about NDAs. As they point out, NDAs should not be used to silence people, although it has become common practice. An NDA is supposed to be about protecting trade secrets. Interesting is that the one woman insists that a payout is not a payment for silence but is actually a payout to avoid being taken to a tribunal for unfair dismissal or something like that. Anyway, good for these women for challenging this practice.
Fifi LaRue said…
Kevin Costner never made eye contact with Mrs. Todger. She must have a reputation as a barracuda that won't take no for an answer. Mr. Todger just listened because he can't keep up with conversation. In the other video Mrs. Todger's lips slide over those gigantic choppers and show her rage at being ignored while someone engages Mr. Todger in conversation.

Mrs. Todger had a nice outfit on, but it was inappropriate for the event. It was an autumn-in-New York-going-to-Fashion Week (she's never invited) outfit rather than a casual California fundraiser for the wealthy where $12,000 is a drop in the bucket. Mrs. Todger sure knows how to stand out like a sore thumb in her clothing choices.
There's an early 16thC painting at the National Gallery with the title `The Ugly Duchess' which is thought to be perhaps the inspiration for Tenniel's version in `Alice in Wonderland' * is well on her way to looking like her.

https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/quinten-massys-an-old-woman-the-ugly-duchess

In the book, the baby the Duchess is holding turns into a piglet...

Stranger things have happened at sea, as they say: as AbbyH mentioned, Operation Mincemeat in which we used a dead body with an elaborate, faked, back-story to mislead the Germans about where we would invade German-occupied territory in the Med.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mincemeat note the suspected involvement of one Ian Fleming. After all, Churchill had said he didn't want people who thought only in straight lines but ones who could think around corners.
Fifi LaRue said…
@GWAH: Costner didn't make eye contact because he's aware of their claws.
Maneki Neko said…
@Wild Boar

I know that painting (The Ugly Duchess), I didn't remember the name. It might well be apt in the future, although I would say she's certainly ugly on the inside.
Maneki Neko said…
Buckingham Palace has denied reports that King Charles could be forced to let Prince Harry stay at Kensington Palace next time he visits the UK.

By law, counsellors of state, which also include Princess Anne and Prince Edward, are required to have a home in Britain but California-based Harry, is effectively homeless in the UK after being evicted from Frogmore Cottage earlier this year.

In a bid to resolve the issue, sources claimed royal courtiers have discussed leasing a property on a royal estate to Harry and Meghan.
...
A friend of Charles said: 'The King can see that to remove Harry as a counsellor of state would be seen as an act of antagonism and he does not want to do that.


https://tinyurl.com/ymz3np5h

I would have thought the fact H 'homeless' in the UK is the perfect excuse to remove him as counsellor of state. It is difficult to see how H could perform this function. I know we've explored this topic but I found this in the House of Commons library article dated 15.11.22.

'The Duke of Sussex cannot act as a Counsellor as he does not currently live in the UK.'
So is he CoS on paper only?

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/creating-more-counsellors-of-state/
Scroll down, last paragraph before 'What is the Message from the King?'
Sandie said…
There are a few more stories like this. He is in pain; she steps in as the 'loving' wife telling him to suck it up as she has what she wants.

https://archive.ph/2023.09.24-222611/https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/us-celebrity-news/meghan-markle-concerned-harry-ties-31016870#selection-1179.0-1179.86

Meghan Markle is said to be concerned for her husband Prince Harry as he's been "tied up in knots" over their feud with the Royal Family.
The couple stepped down from The Firm back in 2020, before moving their family across the pond and settling in Montecito, California. Since then, they've made a number of explosive claims about the Royal Family in their Netflix docuseries and Harry's debut memoir, Spare.
In the book, Harry accused his brother Prince William of "physically attacking him", which the Duke of Sussex claims left him with bruises. Harry also accused his father King Charles of telling lies at the Sandringham Summit, during which he also alleges his brother Prince William "screamed and shouted" at him.

A source has claimed Harry misses his family and wishes for a reunion. They also said Meghan doesn't like to see her husband upset, but thinks it's best for them to move forward.
"It pains Meghan to see Harry tied up in knots like this. She knows how tricky things have been, so this isn't a case of her dismissing or minimising his feelings.
"But, at this point, she really thinks he needs to pull himself together and look forward, instead of backwards - there's no way out of the Hollywood game at this stage, that's their life now and she loves it. There's nothing he can do to change the past," the source said.

Speaking to Heat magazine, the source also said that Meghan is telling Harry to be "strong and positive" while they embrace the new chapter in their lives. They also claimed the former actress is hoping Harry will "embrace" Hollywood with "open arms".
The comments come after it was claimed Harry must now "give notice" to visit his father King Charles III after he was denied a room to stay in at Windsor Castle earlier this month. It has been reported that Harry will have to give notice if he wishes to stay at any royal properties.

It's been claimed Harry wanted to stay at Windsor Castle so he could visit the Queen's resting place at St George's Chapel on the anniversary of her passing. But reports say his request was denied on the grounds that no properties were available.
And now it has emerged that should Harry want to stay at Windsor Castle in January when he is due to return to the UK, he will need to give "suitable warning", according to the Telegraph.
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16rip7b/how_much_is_the_total_net_worth_of_this_group_and/

Them posing with some of their 'besties': Oprah, Ellen, Portia.
Maneki Neko said…
The Prince and Princess of Wales have 'closed their minds' to the possibility that a rift with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle can be fixed, a royal expert has said.

Jennie Bond, the former BBC royal correspondent, added it was clear that Kate Middleton 'has been hurt and insulted by things that Harry and Meghan have said'.

She described how Prince William and his wife had attempted to heal the rift in the Royal Family at Prince Philip's funeral in April 2021, but after a 'blazing row' it became clear it wasn't possible.

Ms Bond told OK Magazine: 'There comes a point when you just have to accept that happy families are not a game that everyone can play.


Can't blame them. I'm sure William and Catherine have tried and have been very patient but they can't take any more. This will make it very difficult in future for the gruesome twosome to be invited to family functions, not that anyone in the BRF will miss them.

DM article https://tinyurl.com/bbv6keef

Sandie said…
Royah Nikkah in the Sunday Times wrote a propaganda piece for Markle and Harry this weekend and it shows what their new strategy is.

Secure a permanent residence in a Royal palace or grounds
Leverage Harry's supposed duty as counselor of state
'Solve the problem' of Harry and Markle's security costs
'Ever so slightly soften the
relationship' between Harry & the King

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16roped/so_they_have_made_the_first_move_of_their_new/
Sandie said…
And the response from the Palace:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12555843/Buckingham-Palace-denies-reports-King-Charles-forced-let-Prince-Harry-stay-Kensington-Palace-time-visits-UK-avoid-stripping-Duke-Counsellor-State-duties.html

Elskainga said…
*There are a few more stories like this. He is in pain; she steps in as the 'loving' wife telling him to suck it up as she has what she wants.

Sandie- This is the same old, same old drivel coming out of Monteshitshow. They are out. Henry must give 28 days notice in order to stay at a royal property and then it’s still not a forgone conclusion it will be accepted. If Henry gives 20 days notice, the request will be denied; he must follow the rules. After the photo of him plastered all over the media of him coming out of St George’s Chapel for HMTLQ remembrance day, the RF know he has not changed. They will no longer be used and abused by Henry. Henry hates his family but feels entitled to all the perks he was born to. I also believe * is forbidden clearance to any Royal property.

These pr articles from * are to keep themselves relevant in the news and prolong the victimhood. Just go away Greedy and Needy.
VetusSacculi said…
@Sandie - I don't doubt * is telling Harry to embrace the future now that she's getting what she wants. Dismissing the past hurt that they caused is straight out of the narcissist's playbook.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16roped/so_they_have_made_the_first_move_of_their_new/

Be afraid, be very afraid -

According to the above, H$M have new strategy coming up, according to Royah Nikkah in yesterday's Sunday Times. I paraphrase:

- get a pad (permanent) on Royal property
- build on H's place as CofS
- get his security paid
- `soften ever so slightly' the relationship with HM the King,

...all as if nothing has happened since they presented the late Queen with their manifesto/demands.

Words fail me.

Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16ru48l/a_little_tidbit_from_twitter_courtesy_of_the/

Supposedly she is relaunching the Tig to coincide with the publication of Scobie's new book (November). WME isn't happy but she is being difficult
Sandie said…
https://twitter.com/butikellucious/status/1705775622407262435/mediaviewer

Is this hapless asking the guy to give his wife the mike, and the guy refuses?
Sandie said…
Hapless as CoS: I agree with those who say that it is an intolerable position to have him on the list. He is not eligible to serve as CoS as he does not have a residence in the UK and lives in America. Pandering to his feelings is ridiculous. The government willingly and easily added Anne and Edward to the list, even though Beatrice and Eugenie are above them in the line of succession.
Sandie said…
https://archive.ph/2023.09.24-231354/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/no-one-wants-to-have-prince-harry-to-stay-and-i-think-i-know-why-8cjgwpl09
-----
An amusing piece by a columnist about hapless being denied a room at Windsor Castle.
Maneki Neko said…
@abbyh

I understand what you're saying and we've long suspected that H&M we're spreading rumours, false information etc but this is from Jenny Bond who worked for fourteen years as the BBC's royal correspondent. Admittedly, this was some time ago (1985-2003) and she might not have many reliable contacts any longer but I can't see the Harkles spreading the above information and saying it's from somebody specific, Jenny Bond in this instance. They'd say 'a source' or something equally vague.
OCGal said…
Oh, this is fun! Watch and delight in this:

https://twitter.com/centerviewnews/status/1706405910350881105

Video is from Kevin Costner event; this is the second time at that event in which the microphone was denied the Douchass.

I can barely believe my eyes, but the video clearly shows that Harry is offered the microphone when the twosome mount the stage. Doofus beta Harry refuses it by waving his hand and then pointing at his alpha boss Meghan. The M.C. host guy in red t-shirt refuses to give Megsy the microphone, and then looks straight at Kevin Costner.

One commenter believes that Kevin Costner had given specific instructions that Meghan Markle not be afforded the opportunity to grab and speak into any microphone at his fundraising event. I believe that to be true.

Other Nutties have already posted the juicy video of Meghan grabbing the microphone from the lady at the fundraiser, but the lady held tight and refused to let it go. For those who haven’t seen and enjoyed this clip, here it is:

https://twitter.com/TheBembridge/status/1705628771103957251
SwampWoman said…
Maneki Neko said:
'The Duke of Sussex cannot act as a Counsellor as he does not currently live in the UK.'
So is he CoS on paper only?

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/creating-more-counsellors-of-state/


I would say that the main reason he cannot act as a Counselor of State is that he is not a working royal. Counselors of State must (now) be working royals. Even if he purchases a modest home in a quaint town in a quiet area to reside in the UK, he would still not meet the criteria because he is not a working royal.
Maneki Neko said…
@OCGal

I love the way the host at the Kevin Costner event held on to the microphone with both hands, or rather his right hand, his left hand firmly gripping his right arm 🤣. I think hapless H was under instructions from * not to speak and to let her the microphone.

OCGal:

These videos are so clear, aren't they? Before, on SMM, I'd missed the way the male host smiles/laughs as he keeps hold of the mike - a real `You've got to be kidding!' moment.
Taz's latest, courtesy of SMM - it's excellent:

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16s75su/timestamp_538_taz_does_it_again_the_best_analysis/

Or Here's the URL: https://youtu.be/1u0qpV5yM4k

I took the hint in SMM to find it directly.
I've just discovered this account:

https://twitter.com/TheFakeDuchess

A post from 15th Sept 2022 leaves me in no doubt that `* was under the influence' at the Windsor walkabout. The film was not shot from the public side of the barrier...

An aide with a body cam? Like the pics from the Investiture Exhibition?
Sandie said…
@OCGal
I am not sure which is more hilarious: her trying to grab the mike and be denied, twice (second time via hapless who knows that there is trouble ahead for him if she does not get that mike!), or the smile she kept plastered on her face.

@abbyh @Maneki Neko
I agree that it is credible that William and Catherine have 'let go and moved on', long ago for TBW and now for hapless. Surely they realize that the duo are toxic and not capable of change. Even Charles seems to have taken a hard line with his son ... I am too busy, you must schedule with my aides well ahead of the date, you are welcome to visit me at Balmoral in absolute privacy when it fits into my schedule, no you may not stay at Windsor Castle (which is the largest castle in the world ever and has permanent staff always present) ...

But, I agree that this plays perfectly into the victim narrative for the duo. However, I think they have played those cards so many times that it is just not a winning hand anymore. Nonetheless. Scobie (with his ghostwriters in Montecito) is going to go nuclear on attacking the royal family with lies. Perhaps the three of them underestimate the power of the monarchy and just how much such a war will damage them, or maybe they will be happy with the small but fanatically crazy supporters they will get. Will they be enough for the threesome to earn millions on social media?
Sandie said…
https://youtu.be/1u0qpV5yM4k

I always enjoy videos from Taz. Here is her take on the 'grab the mike' moments. The coverage of the harkles starts at 6 minutes.

I was sure that Bodyguard II starring TBW was a possibility. Hmmm ... the body language from Costner says otherwise! Is this something she was trying to manifest? They have the same agent. Maybe Costner was open to the idea, but once he saw her in person he went completely off the idea.

Speaking of WME ... how many months has it been, and they have not struck any deals for madame? Just rumours of her being difficult, wanting a political career, wanting to revive the Tig but not actually doing it, trying to manifest Dior ... this would not be the scenario if she had talent and was 'hot property' in Hollywood and with high-end brands for merching and could guarantee a following of many millions on social media.
Sandie said…
River tells us that he heard from a friend that Harry was asked to attend the European Polo Championship 2023. This took place in Dusseldorf, around the same time as Ingriftus. Harry was asked to attend as a spectator. He wanted 70k for attending (to be paid to his "foundation" - not known if this was Archewell, Sentebale or something else). The Polo Club turned him down.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16s4nzw/how_much_for_harry_70k_according_to_what_river/

I wonder if money for appearances does go directly to the charity or if it gets routed via Archwell where 90% gets siphoned off to pay for 'expenses'.
Sandie said…
Does anyone know anything about Bazi (Chinese astrology)? This is a very long reading that comes across as biased to me but there are some gems in it. Main predictions: hapless will leave her for a younger woman (soon), she will end up alone and with ill health, her and Archie don't really get along, she will not be successful in merching Lilli, Doria is a very bad influence on her... It is a long reading.

-----
September 26th 2023 : Meghan Markle's Bazi study - Chinese astrology
I'm doing a second Meghan Markle bazi theme study in a series of bazi themes I'm going to do on the royal family, and other famous people. Because it's also interesting to understand why Meghan isn't as brilliant as she claimed to be.

Meghan is a Jia wood born in the summer season when fire and earth are the strongest elements. Jia wood is normally weak in summer, but she still benefits from the Jia wood roots that are hidden in the Tiger pillar, which is her pillar of the day and birth hour, which makes her daymaster moderately strong. The Tiger's Pillar normally causes the wood to grow, so we can deduce that the tree is going to be big. The Tiger pillar also represents a forest. Its favourable elements are fire, earth and metal. And its unfavourable elements are wood and water.

The most interesting thing about this bazi is that the wood needs water to be healthy under the powerful fire of the sun. Meghan's bazi has no water at all to protect the wood. So the wood dries out under the heat of the sun, and we can say that it will become leafless trees.
Sandie said…
Cont.

However, following this logic, if we look at Meghan's birth time, which is Tiger time, with the Bing star representing the sun in the celestial branches, which looks strong in appearance because it is rooted below the Tiger pillar. Meghan wants to shine with her intelligence represented by Bing, but as she was born at night, her sun is completely invisible as it is lying down and not yet rising, which is a poor quality sun. From this we can deduce that :


1) that with the Bing as the Output star, to represent her intelligence in the celestial branches that Meghan cannot control because it comes from divine will, Meghan's intelligence that she makes appear "strong" is actually of poor quality because the Sun is not visible at night. That means she's stupider than she looks and she's not a star at all, she doesn't attract anyone around her with her bad ideas, she has no charisma. In fact, she has the charisma of a rotten mussel.


2) The Bing sun, which is invisible at night, doesn't burn wood, and that wood is still strong for now. But what will burn the wood? It's the Ding Output star, which represents a candle. As it was born at night, and fire is very strong in summer, Ding doesn't represent a pretty candle, but in reality a fire that burns everything in its path because there's no water to keep it burning. Burned trees become ugly, so Meghan will become ugly and look like a withered tree from burning her skin in the solar cabins, without water.
Sandie said…
Cont.

This fire Ding, rooted in the Earth Goat, which represents his ideas and his intelligence is out of control, without water to reduce the damage, will burn his friendships represented by the star wood Jia and his fans, represented by the star wood Yi. This shows that she is alienating her audience and her supporters represented by the wood, in her quest for wealth represented by the Earth Goat, with Lady Diana brand ( Earth is the mother-in-law ). And fire represents her children because Jia wood produces fire in Bazi cycle, and Fire element is also the wealth generated by ideas : Bing is Lilibet, she is the invisible sun that we never see and who will not give her money contrary to what Meghan believed. And Archie is Ding fire, a destructive fire which shows that Archie already has problems with Meghan as SecondHandCoke said on Reddit.

Meghan is going to have a lot of problems, merching her brand with her children. Especially since the fire Ding, is rooted in the Earth Goat, which is a graveyard pillar, which weakens the fire and the earth over time even if they are strong.

The most interesting thing about Meghan Markle's bazi is that she doesn't have water which is her resource star. This star represents the mother, because water produces wood. We know that Doria Ragland, his mother, was completely absent for a large part of her life.

The resource star does not only represent the mother, it also represents health, knowledge and assistance from noble people. People bestow with a healthy resource star usually have their life much easier. They have great vitality, superior knowledge and always seems able to get out of situation with external assistance.
Sandie said…
Cont.

If water, which is the resource star, is absent from Meghan Markle's bazi, it means that her health will become very poor over time given her abuse with drugs and alcohol, as well as her has no knowledge of the world around her and does not know how to exploit knowledge, which means she is completely illiterate in everything she does to the point of using platitudes and word salad, to the point of fraud. It also shows that she doesn't really receive support from well-placed people in society, they reject her because of her harsh behavior with her endless demands and absurd ideas ( Uncontrolable Fire Ding who razes all the trees of forest ).

Her husband is represented by the metal Xin in the celestial branches and the Rooster pillar in the earthly branches. This metal dies in the summer season but becomes of average quality due to the rooting of the Xin metal in the Rooster pillar located in the earthly branches, which is reflected in the celestial branches with the Xin star. It can be deduced that the popularity of Meghan Markle represented by the Rooster peach blossom, will be between weak and average quality, not be as strong as his brother-in-law Prince William's peach blossom which is the very strong fire horse, because William was born in summer.

Meghan, who is the wood Jia, is separated from her husband represented by the metal Xin and the Rooster pillar, by the wood Yi, younger than her ( Berth Herily ? ), who will steal her husband in the end.
Sandie said…
Cont.

We are in 2023, the year of the Water Rabbit who will clash with the rooster who represents her husband. And during the Rat's luck pillar, which lasts from 2022 to 2032. Its luck pillar, here the Rat, destroys the Rooster, which means that there will indeed be a divorce, by the end of the year at least of December which is the Rat month. Probably on stories of alcoholism ( Rat/ Rooster destruction) and sexual violence ( Rabbit/Rat harm) that Meghan will blame Harry, even though it is she who abuses her husband and others, while her husband abused others according to certain rumors.

It is also this year that Meghan will really lose the little popularity she has left with her audience of fans who will melt like snow in the sun, because the Rabbit clashes with the Rooster in Rat's luck pillar, which lasts from 2022 to 2032. Rat destroys Rooster, and Meghan will endure this loss of popularity until 2032.

Finally, there is also an injury caused by the luck pillar of the Rat, on the Earth Goat which represents its wealth with the fire Output star Ding which is rooted there, and is unable to generate wealth from his ideas and children represented by the fire Ding because the Water Rat hurts the Earth Goat. I think the Water Rat here is Doria Ragland who has a very bad influence on Meghan Markle.

We know that since 2022, since the beginning of the decennial luck pillar of Rat, Meghan has had more and more money problems. And it's not really going to get better for her, because from 2032 to 2042, she will be in the lucky pillar of the Ox which also hurts the Earth Goat. His money problems will last. I don't think that given her luck pillar of Rat who destroys the Rooster ( = marriage ), she has any chance of remarrying. She will not have another husband after Harry.

I think that seen like that, she's really going to end up like Judy Garland, who died drugged and ruined, alone in the night without her family. Beacause of Geng metal in heavenly stems of Rat's luck pillar hits the Jia wood which is withered, it is an ax that cuts dead and burned wood and it gives an image of suicide. Exactly as Queen Talking Tarot predicted in her readings in 2019.
Sandie said…
There is also a reading for hapless.

September 25th 2023 : Prince Harry's Brazi study - Chinese astrology

The Bazi card of Harry, Duke of Sussex is very accurate : he is a strong Ren water daymaster, born in autumn with the strongest elements, Water and Metal. His unfavourable elements based on his daymaster are Water and Metal. His favourable elements are fire, earth and wood.

His intelligence is represented by his Output star, Jia wood. This star is dead and very weak because it is not 1) sufficiently rooted below the earthly branches, 2) the wood died in the autumn season, which is Harry's season of birth. This means his brain isn't functioning normally because of drugs and alcohol, and he doesn't have a creative mind to make money from. It's clear that the Invictus Games were not his original idea, since it was the idea of his brother and sister-in-law.

His children are represented by Wu earth, the Seven Killings sitting on the Monkey branch in Birth Hour. This Wu earth which is very strong because it is rooted in the earthly branches. While the soil is weak in autumn, it becomes moderately stronger thanks to rooting in Harry's bazi.

The most interesting thing is that it has no fire in its bazi theme. The element of fire represents both his wife and his wealth. If this element is missing, it shows recurring problems in finding the right woman, and in mismanaging his wealth, which causes financial problems. In addition, the absence of the fire element also shows that Harry will have no affinity with his wives, even if there were another one after Meghan.

To finish the study of Harry's bazi, we see that he has too much water, which indicates a problem with his emotions, and also all the things linked to alcohol and drugs. Harry's alcoholism and drug addiction is highlighted by the destruction between the pillar of the day, represented by the Rat, and the pillar of the parents/career, represented by the Rooster. In the bazi cycle, the element that produces water is metal and this represents his mother, Lady Diana. We can deduce from this that Harry's trauma, to the point of drowning in alcohol and drugs, is above all linked to the death of Lady Di, represented by the Rooster.
Sandie said…
Reading for hapless cont.

The pillar of the day, here the Rat, represents the Spouse Palace, Meghan Markle who is the strong and unfavourable water element, which means that she will dominate it in her marriage and that there will be violence. With the destruction between the Rat and the Rooster, we can also say that her marriage is making Prince Harry an alcoholic and drug addict. This destruction between the Rat and the Rooster, two peach flowers with very strong elements of water and metal that give him a very strong popularity, shows that this popularity has finally faded because of his addictions and his bad marriage to Meghan Markle, and more particularly since the Megexit in the Rat's luck pillar which lasted from 2012 to 2022, and during Annual Pillar of the Rat in 2020.

This year, 2023, is the Year of the Water Rabbit. The Rabbit, combined with the Rat, forms a Uncivilized punishment that could lead to sexual violence, but also to divorce from Meghan Markle by the end of the year, in the Rat month, particularly from December 4th 2023 to January 4th 2024.
-----
My comment: the marriage did not cause the problem with drink and drugs as they started in his teenage years.
Sandie said…
Returning to the Royal Nikkah article:

https://www.tumblr.com/brf-rumortrackinganon/729457655388749824?source=share

Is the divorce coming?
The Sussexes have reissued their demands to Charles. This time, through Roya Nikkah (scroll to the end for the link). Except...I don't think this is Meghan. I think this is Harry trying to negotiate the terms of returning to the UK after a Sussex divorce with ultimatums (e.g., "I'll come back like you want me to, Pa, but only if...").

Look at this quote that Roya attributes to an unnamed friend of Harry's: "Meghan seems to have decided that coming back more [to the UK] is not what she wants to do, but Harry would like to." This is probably the most obvious, if not outright, hint that Harry and Meghan are planning to separate soon, if they haven't already. Reading between the lines, Harry planning for his children to live in the US while he works as a full-time royal in the UK.

Anyway. Harry's demands.

"Diplomatic" status back via official Counsellor of State status: "[Charles's] decision to keep Harry as a counsellor of state...has created a dilemma. By law, counsellors of state are requried to have a UK domicile, but Harry has no home here...courtiers have discussed leasing a property on the royal estate"

A permanent residence in the UK: "There is work to be done here [in the UK] in terms of the charities, and there would be opportunities in the future where [Harry] will want to be here a bit more. If they could have kept Frogmore, they would have done - it was the perfect setup for them."
Sandie said…
Cont.

The return of Harry's full permanent security detail: "The prince has challenged the decision by the Home Office to remove his Metropolitan Police protection when he is in the UK, even though he has offered to pay for it himself. A legal representative for Harry has said he is 'unable to return to his home' with his family because it is too dangerous."

BRF to make amends first: "...if Charles offered the Sussexes a home on the royal estate, 'it would be an ever-so-slight softening of relations.'"

Also, Roya's article makes it pointedly clear that from the Harry's perspective, it's the courtiers and the Waleses who don't want them back despite Charles leaving the door open for them:

Throwing the courtiers under the bus: "last week, courtiers were keen to ensure that William returned to the UK from his solo trip to New York on Wednesday morning, before Charles and Camilla departed for their state visit to France on the same day."

Throwing the Waleses under the bus: "According to royal sources, courtiers have discussed leasing a property on the royal estate to Harry and Meghan to try to resolve the counsellor-of-state conundrum. One option understood to have been considered is accommodation at Kensington Palace, where the Prince and Princess of a home and their private office. They spend few nights there, having moved their family to Windsor."
Girl with a Hat said…
I read in the DM that they spent $12k each to attend Kevin Costner's benefit. And for $24k she expected a microphone and a speech. LOL
Sandie said…
@WNBM
I see you also posted the link to the latest video from Taz. It is great and I highly recommend those who have not watched it to trust the endorsement from @WBBM and mtself.
Sandie said…
https://harrymarkle.substack.com/p/is-tw-taking-the-mic?publication_id=269387&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=fhkfk

This jumped out at me from the latest Harry Markle post:

"Oprah, however, was given the mic on stage to talk about the charity."
Sandie said…
Did you notice that they had a ring of security around them at the Costner event? I counted at least 4 bodyguards. It looked ridiculous.
OCGal said…
@Sandie, you wrote

“Did you notice that they had a ring of security around them at the Costner event? I counted at least 4 bodyguards. It looked ridiculous.”

1. I have a waggish explanation for that: perhaps the bodyguards’ purpose is to protect potential kidnappers from the Harkles. Were the Harkles kidnapped, I imagine the world would soon start getting wildly desperate inverse-ransom pleas…BY THE KIDNAPPERS…begging and promising to pay any amount of money if someone, anyone, would take the Harkles off their hands.

2. In actuality, no, I hadn’t noticed the idiotic ring of security around the two grifting losers but now I can’t stop seeing them. I hope they receive hazard pay for the embarrassment of having to cosplay their protection roles with the delusional duo.
Girl with a Hat said…
I think the security is there to try to get their hands on a microphone for *
Girl with a Hat said…
Reportedly, Fendi on Rodeo Drive has fallen out with mm over freebies she requested and an Affiliate Merchandising agreement she wanted. She was seen and heard in the Fendi store arguing loudly and publicly with the manager whom she accused of being disrespectful to her.

https://twitter.com/ArabellaRober19/status/1706663293522247904
Hikari said…
@OCGal

Further waggery . .

Perhaps the ring of security was provided by Mr. Costner in order to create a buffer of protection between the Harkles and the other VIP guests.

At this point I do not understand why anyone would agree to be photographed anywhere near them, be seen speaking to them, looking at them or even have their names linked in print as having attended the same event. They are absolute poison. Did Kevin Costner require their (relatively) piddly $24K so bad to make it worth putting up with their nonsense. If Markle thought nothing of ridiculing the Queen of the United Kingdom, she'd think nothing of ruining an event put on by even the Hollywood A-list. Kevin should have declined their money and their attendance. Word should be put around every celebrity event in the country that the Harkles are NOT WELCOME and their money is no good.
Sandie said…
@GWAH
LOL! Or maybe to stop Costner, or any other wealthy, successful and good-looking man from being overcome with awe at her beauty and brilliance and making a lunge for her!

@Hikari
I think hanging out at places like this blog can lead to underestimating how stupid people can be, how badly they can judge character, and how shallow their values can be! Scandal after scandal among celebrities reveals that those in the business of getting attention will overlook appalling behaviour and tolerate (even put on a friendly display with) dreadful people quite easily. As long as the duo have the money to turn up to events, they will be tolerated. But, with this event, maybe Costner agreed to not only have them there but get them (him) up on stage to hand him an award, because he wanted to draw media coverage of the event and the cause (and what a good guy he really is). Maybe that is how WME sold it to him. The duo always travel with their paps and tabloids like DM always buy and publish those photographs.
NeutralObserver said…
@Hikari, Lady C. claims that Costner allowed the Todgers' appearance at the fundraiser at the behest of WME head honcho Ari Emanuel, & they didn't pay for tickets. Costner is a WME client & is a team player, as well as a long time HW survivor, so he reluctantly went along with the whole debacle. It was very apparent that he wasn't entranced by ILBW, who was there strictly as Mr. Todger's plus-one. Lady C. also claims that ILBW was reportedly as high as a kite at the event.

I'm just guessing, but I wonder if Costner is a bit old-fashioned & sexist, & if he doesn't approve of ladies over indulging in various substances which might make them get a bit out of control.He might be ok with guys getting a bit wild, but not women.

We've seen ILBW seem 'under the influence' in public appearances since she appeared in the RF. Costner allegedly rebuffed notable druggie Amber Heard at some point. I don't know much about Costner's two ex-wives, but from what little I've seen of them, they both appear to be quite healthy & sane, whatever else you might say about them. Costner might not be that into the drinkin' & druggin' HW gals. I would be quite surprised if ILBW was his cup of tea.
OCGal said…
@Hikari, I agree 100% with your comments which started with

“…I do not understand why anyone would agree to be photographed anywhere near them, be seen speaking to them, looking at them or even have their names linked in print as having attended the same event. They are absolute poison”
If I understand it right there are people in the UK who want mr Doofus and madame Doofus to come back and represent the royal family again. Not only the sussex sugars but other people also. To give them the famous plant peace offering no one wants to name any more.

What I don't understand who believes that TRF can ever trust anything with Harry any more? There can't be anyone in the army, in the serious political world or within the numerous charities or the society who is ready to risk their name and reputation with that stupid immoral traitor or his wife.

One has never seen so whip smart circus as The Doofus Games and Costner fundraising do were. The elegance, charm and brilliance of those two were insurmountable. Truly.
NeutralObserver said…
I don't think Costner or the One805 charity wanted the Todgers at their do, or needed the publicity. The whole thing was just a low-key bash in a S.Cal beach community which just happens to contain more billionaires & millionaires than most places . The people there wanted to throw some cash to their first responders, give themselves a bit of a tax break & schmooze with their fellow rich people. The Todgers were surplus to requirements, but WME knew that a party with Oprah, Ellen, Kevin Costner & Maroon 5 would get the media attention the Todgers seem to think they need & deserve. It's getting a lot of SM attention because of ILBW's noticeable weird behavior. She's going to have a hard time living down that mic grab attempt & the horse blanket outfit. The Todgers just keep shooting themselves in the foot.
Sandie said…
Some alleged hot piping tea from WME. Nothing unexpected for us here! Remember, WME are a promotional company but one that strikes deals for clients ... merching, Hollywood, advertising and so on.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16sytq0/some_alleged_tea_that_might_explain_tw_and/
Sandie said…
This post also has the alleged tea from WME.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16sxm6b/twitter_tea_re_wme/
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16swm2q/how_talented_alisters_greeted_the_queen_vs_a/

Someone put together a video of well-known Americans curtsying to the late Queen. For some of them it is more of a bow, and for others it is a bob and slight bowing of the head. They all look elegant and gracious.
Fifi LaRue said…
@NeutralObserver: I think you're on to something about Mr. Costner being sexist, and not liking to see women getting drunk and/or high on drugs. Of which Mrs. Todger was both as indicated by her arms and hands flailing everywhere.

It looked to me that Mrs. Todger tried to grab the microphone with both hands, and then when the woman turned away, Mrs. Todger still had her hands on the woman. She had her hands on Mr. Todger and someone else. Mrs. Todger's hands all over other people is just vomitous to witness, so creepy.

Mr. Costner never once made eye contact with the ILBW.

Horseblanket! That's a good one! She looked a dam* fool in that get up in a southern Cali beach town. Maybe she was angling for a part on Yellowstone. She's already put out that she's up for the remake of The Bodyguard, except Mrs. Todger forgot that can't sing.
Fifi LaRue said…
We have to give credit where credit is due...Oprah was the first celebrity to banish the Harkles socially by not inviting them to the Adele concert. Oprah knew long ago that the Todgers are poison.
Fifi LaRue said…
@Sandie: Thank you for all the referrals to SMM. Personally I don't believe the one about the WME employee spilling about mm. Recently I was traveling with some people who are Hollywood adjacent, that is entertainment lawyers, and they have some personal friends who are television/movie stars. They keep their lips sealed. To reveal anything about a star/celebrity would put the person's position/profession into jeopardy. When a person is on the business side of show business, they keep their mouths shut or else find employment elsewhere. The thing about mm and Serena being very close isn't believable. I remember the pained look Serena gave when promoting Batter Up with HasBeen. She did not do that willingly out of friendship with the Harkles. Nope. mm ruined Serena's tennis game, and Basic Instinct flashed Serena's husband. Nope. They are not friends.
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16t4ifp/archewell_geanco_will_hank_and_his_wife_attend/

Is this where we are going to see them next, at the GEANCO gala in Hollywood, with Oprah and Angelina Jolie?
NeutralObserver said…
@Fifi LaRue, your comment at 3:57 AM made me think of how little gossip comes out about big HW players, in a community rife with self indulgence.It's likely a combination of Omerta & mutually assured destruction in a PR war. Everyone is surrounded by hired hands who could ruin anyone who leaked dirt about anyone else.

I don't read tabloids other than an occasional glance at the Daily Mail, but as far as I can tell the only leaks about Costner's divorce have been about money & houses & who gets what.

The Todgers' lack of discretion is probably a big reason why the Todgers, especially ILBW, are being shunned in HW, they're blabbermouths & malicious. (I'm dubious of the SMM WME tea as well.Serena Williams seems sensible enough to protect herself from the ILBWs of the world.)
No need to get excited about reports with headlines which seem to imply that they're getting a `second home'.

No, it's not a new house, they just sending a donation to help African girls. Probably no more than a packet of Dr White's STs, judging from their previous `generous' gifts to those in need. Oh yes, Africa's H's `second home', don'tcha know?
Sandie said…
I have come across numerous discussions of the appearance at the Costner event and the role of WME. Perhaps I am misunderstanding the role of WME.

Sunshine Sachs was about publicity, using appearances, awards, social media, traditional media, tabloids, celebrity 'friends' ... all to create a positive chosen narrative about them.

WME is about striking money-making deals ... endorsements, Hollywood deals (acting and/or producing), merching on social media, appearing in advertising campaigns. WME takes a cut when she signs a contract.

I have been thinking about how the appearance on stage can be connected to WME. For Costner, having the duo there, and Oprah, Ellen and Portia, gave him publicity for a fund-raising event and cause. But how does it get any of them major money-making deals? Costner comes out if it looking like a good guy (thus protecting his lucrative acting, directing and producing career)? But I do not see how any of the others 'made' or 'will make' money for WME with lucrative contracts that WME takes a slice of by appearing at that event.

Surely Sunshine Sachs is for good PR, but WME is for striking deals. (Hence why I assumed WME brought them together because Costner is considering Bodyguard II, TBW wants the leading role, and Oprah is being tapped to fund the movie.)
Magatha Mistie said…

Costner-mongers

Invited or not
She was there
like a shot
Most folk oblivious
unaware
Tried taking the mic’
That lady was quick
Wonder how much it
Coster ‘n’ spare…




SwampWoman said…
NeutralObserver said...
I don't think Costner or the One805 charity wanted the Todgers at their do, or needed the publicity. The whole thing was just a low-key bash in a S.Cal beach community which just happens to contain more billionaires & millionaires than most places . The people there wanted to throw some cash to their first responders, give themselves a bit of a tax break & schmooze with their fellow rich people. The Todgers were surplus to requirements, but WME knew that a party with Oprah, Ellen, Kevin Costner & Maroon 5 would get the media attention the Todgers seem to think they need & deserve. It's getting a lot of SM attention because of ILBW's noticeable weird behavior. She's going to have a hard time living down that mic grab attempt & the horse blanket outfit. The Todgers just keep shooting themselves in the foot.


cynicism on/ Yep. I will just note that Oprah has gotten a buttload of bad publicity herself recently in Maui, and Ellen has the bad publicity for being a bitch to her staff after using the nice persona on her show (but occasionally the mean peeked through).

While this was raising money for a worthy cause (the first responders), I am going to cynically note that it is ultimately self serving in nature. The first responders are serving *them*. They are raising money for equipment that will be used on *them*. The people working to alleviate their overdoses, save their houses in a wildfire, or cut them out of expensive vehicles can't afford to live in their 'hoods. IF they want to keep their protection, they need to keep them happy, or they'll move to a more affordable (for them) location.

/End of cynicism.

Hope y'all are having a good day!
Fifi LaRue said…
@NeutralObserver: Yes, about the Harkles' lack of discretion. If people are snakes enough to publicly trash both their immediate families, over and over again; and, reveal information about others (Courtney Cox) that should have been kept quiet, then that makes the Harkles poison in HW.
Fifi LaRue said…
It's beyond cringey that the Harkles gave an award to Costner. They think they are royalty in exile. They are insane. I bet that award went in the trash as soon as the Harkles' backs were turned.
NeutralObserver said…
@Swamp Woman at 3:43 PM

LOL! Yes, it was ever thus. First responders need cash, and what the NYTimes used quaintly call 'bold face names' need to make themselves look like nice folks.So, the bold face names did have an interest in distracting from reports of an acrimonious divorce, allegations of bullying & clumsy disaster relief efforts.

Perhaps the Todgers did draw a bit more interest in what was largely a local event. The big difference between the Todgers & the other big names at the event is that Oprah, Ellen & Kevin can, & probably did, write big checks to the charity. There are rumors that the Todgers did no such thing, & aren't in a position to do so. The Todgers have their own reputation problems & apparently didn't contribute anything to One805's bottom line. If I were a 'bold face name' or a first responder, I would feel that I hadn't gotten good value for my efforts.
Sandie said…
@SwampWoman
Thanks so much for your post. Cynical? It just finally made sense to me. Sure those celebrities love to get attention and spent a lot of time posing for photos. But they are 'supporting' the people who will rescue them in the case of a disaster. The fires in Hawaii must have scared the hell out of them! This is not actually a community where neighbours help each other out in time of need.
EXCLUSIVE: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's team requested cushions, new carpet, and outdoor space to film Harlem elementary students for their Netflix documentary during 2021 New York visit

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12558341/Harry-Meghan-Archewell-team-requests-cushions-new-carpet-film-Harlem-elementary-students-Netflix-doc.html
Maneki Neko said…
I mentioned upthread * not reading the room during their visit to a school in Harlem - couture outfit and expensive jewellery. This is even worse and shows what control freaks the Harkles are. Actually, I'd say all this is from the witch.
Excerpt from DM article.

The files [Newly released emails], obtained by DailyMail.com via a FOIA request, show how the Sussexes' high-powered aides had pulled strings behind the scenes to ensure they were presented in a positive light during a series of public appearances that were filmed for their $100million Netflix documentary.

For one of the stops in their three-day tour, representatives for Harry and Meghan raised the idea of bringing cushions and a new carpet to a public school in one of New York's low-income areas to better fit with Meghan's aesthetic.

The emails show Archewell staff had a say in which school they would visit, went through multiple edits of press releases to make their appearance sound 'more substantial,' and even amended the public diary for top school officials.

The press list for their events was also tightly controlled and restricted to Meghan-friendly publications, such as Vogue and other outlets, while British tabloids were banned.
. . .

* wanted to be seen in a very positive light. If she was such a nice, good person, there'd be no need for all that control freakery. She obviously cared more about her image than the school and schoolchildren, which we knew. You can put lipstick on a pig...

https://tinyurl.com/2mxnpak6
Cushions and carpets? Good grief, Archewell could have provided these many times over. As for `Meghan's aesthetic' yet again, wtf does she think she is? And wtf's the matter with her?

I'm surprised she didn't moan about the red-and-gold decor at Buck House not being beiged over to suite her taste. Hasn't anyone told her that beige is the biggest no-no when trying to flog one's house in the UK? Beige carpet, beige upholstery, beige walls scream `Beware of Oldies ' - folk who allegedly haven't had a new idea since the 1970s when Dulux `Muffin' was all the rage. Especially applies to folk who wear beige clothes and have beige hair and beige faces.

The late Barbara Cartland (IIRC, Diana's step-grandmother), swathed in shocking pink, damned the wearing of beige because `nobody wants to look like a baked potato'.
OCGal said…
Truth! Yes I agree with a tweeter that the douchass was likely filming and voice-recording everything at the Kevin Costner fundraising event, hence wearing the gargantuanly voluminous horse blanket coat to hide the mics and apertures and wires etc.

This image is humorously tampered with to make a point, but the point is not fake, nor humorous in the slightest. She just will not quit with her sneakiness. She will never quit, and her beta cuck loser of a husband knows all, and approves of her methods, her intent, and her destructiveness.

https://twitter.com/devastellar/status/1705887386121687062
Maneki Neko said…
@Wild Boar

Ah yes, *'s 'aesthetic'. I found that very surprising.
Re beige, didn't * complain that the Palace didn't want her to wear any colours and that she had to wear beige? She's bonkers.
Sandie said…
What do you think? I think the story about their visit to the school in Harlem is the end for them. Other stories will emerge, which will make people think twice about doing deals with them, and will keep reminding people how awful they are. Bower's book had a whole chapter about how she behaved like a ridiculous diva (and stole shoes) for a photo shoot for Reitmans, when almost nobody in the world had heard of her.
-----

They posted on Archwell site some pompous nonsense about donating menstrual products to girls in Nigeria, or to a charity that purchases and distributes the products. I have something to say to her: You are not Nigerian, you know nothing about Nigeria or Nigerians - just stop it! Which she will. The only thing she has faithfully stick to over the years is herself ... everything else gets dumped sooner or later.
-----

@WBBM
Dulux 'muffin'! About 20 years I latched onto a paint trend, that was probably waning by then, of using colour and textures on walls, so every room was a different colour (blues and yellows was my theme), and I experimented with ragging, smudging, rubbing, feature walls! Back to the duo ... the trouble with beige is that it tends to absorb light (dreadful for walls), and only works for soft furnishings if you add a lot of colour and textures with rugs, comfy cushions, painting ...
OCGal said…
LOL! Listen to this hard-hitting fake interview with H, and look at how magnificently H’s replies and reactions have been threaded in. It is so very well done.

https://twitter.com/hrrysgreysuit/status/1616167637767303168
Sandie said…
@Maneki Neko
Everything they do is about image and is controlled. I have often wondered who she really is or if she is an empty vessel.
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16tinx2/hot_from_the_coffee_shop_in_south_africa/

This is hilarious ... from a coffee shop in South Africa. Read the comment below the pics to understand the reference (what a red cappuccino is).
Mel said…
Imagine being a guest at the Costner event.
You go there, a nice local event, supporting a good cause. It all seems legit. Nice and low-key, nothing gaudy or ostentatious.

And then the Harkles show up. Their assistants filming everything.

And lo and behold, suddenly you and your friends are plastered all over the internet for days.

And the Harkles wonder why they're not welcome anywhere.
Mel said…
70 boxes of tampons is going to make a *big* difference, y'all.

And you know the Harkles didn't pay for them.
Girl with a Hat said…
@Sandie, that's hilarious.

Thanks for sharing.
Fifi LaRue said…
The Harkles got into Costner's event by begging WME for Two Freebies (they couldn't afford the $24,000 total asking for charity.) Costner relents as a favor to WME, and the Harkles present him with some fake, tacky award. I bet he told them under his breath what they could do with the award. Were the Harkles the ones who were gauche enough to ask how much Costner's ranch was worth? $5 says it was them.
Mel said…
I think that Mm was denied the mic a 3rd time.

When H was demanding the mic from the emcee, Mm's hands went up like she knew that H would get the mic, and then hand it to her. She was starting to reach for it from Harry.

When he didn't get the mic, she started fumbling the award and almost dropped it.
Mel said…
I wonder if her stupid outfit at the Costner event was because she was trying to cosplay royal.
Watch her hand and mouth movements. She was trying out her royal moves.

At Invictus she was trying out her easy breezy CA girl mode. For the life of me, I can't figure out why she didn't do her royal act at Invictus.
Sandie said…
@OCGal
That fake 60 Minutes interview is truly hilarious, and so well done. I loved the end ... 'You can do us all a favour and go jump in a lake'!
-----

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16u6713/an_announcement_about_archefail_partnering_with/

They are so pompous in their announcements and using the word 'partnership'. This was announced on social media but then removed from their Archwell website. Did Mina's list complain?

"The announcement about Archefail's contribution of feminine hygiene products to GEANCO, was made soon after this post about a political project with Mina's List was removed."

They are a political organization who work in Afghanistan and Nigeria. There is nothing on their website about TBW or Archwell. But they did announce on social media on 12 September that they are in partnership with Archwell to launch a political empowerment programme for women (assuming in America). It sounds like she wrote those social media posts. She found someone to latch into that can serve as a political platform for her. That woman is relentless, for herself!

https://www.minaslist.org/what-we-do

Sandie said…
https://x.com/MinasList?t=mLWCCOZrbNR4sStzH6Ss2g&s=09

I checked ... the X posts about Archwell have indeed been removed.
Sandie said…
The Royal Grift covers the 'terms' of the visit to the school in New York in every astonishing detail. The visit was a promotion for her book (Penguin Random House was part of the planning) and hapless was simply trailing behind her and forgotten.

I know that release form they got the parents and school to sign is long and tedious, but it is worth it because it reveals just how scary her compulsion to control, dominate and self promote is, above anything and everything. The word 'universe' is actually used. Yep, she demanded all rights for all time for any possible use, not only globally but in the entire universe!

Unfortunately, the DM's coverage of this is superficial. The true extent of the derangement is revealed in this video.

https://youtu.be/-S1qqf_4jNk?si=ImNo9N5DCan-9gCB
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16u9n5o/graham_norton_talks_about_bumping_into_prince/

OMG ... Graham Norton bumped into hapless coming out of the loo at a nightclub ... a gay nightclub! As the poster said, this was probably in 2014.

I have never believed at all that hapless may be a closet gay. But, there may be a lot in his past that we do not know. TBW may know and that is why she pushes the 'intense so in love agenda'? No, he was just drunk and drugged up in a gay bar. Just because someone goes to a gay bar does not mean they are gay. But this piece of information is so interesting!
Fifi LaRue said…
Re: Costner Event: There were active orders to NOT let the Doucheass get a hold of a mic at any time.
OKay said…
There seem to be a lot of posts carrying incorrect information. Costner's fundraiser was said to cost $12,000 per table, not per person. The Harkles still can't afford it, of course, but no one coughed up $24,000 for the two of them to attend.
OCGal said…
Universe!

@Sandie, I, too, watched The Royal Grift’s video and was as astounded and revolted as you at the use of the word UNIVERSE:

“I know that release form they got the parents and school to sign is long and tedious, but it is worth it because it reveals just how scary her compulsion to control, dominate and self promote is, above anything and everything. The word 'universe' is actually used. Yep, she demanded all rights for all time for any possible use, not only globally but in the entire universe!”

The poor (literally and figuratively) parents who received and were meant to read, absorb, and sign multi pages of legalese in a wall of tiny type? How dare she, how dare her team, and how dare the school district allow this charade to take place using and abusing the students and their teachers. Shameful.

And all this to be done, it sounded to me, just overnight. The constant back and forth emails and contractual forms being re-edited up until the last minute. I could be wrong but I believe the final accepted contract terminology wasn’t agreed upon until there was only one day left to submit release forms to parents, and get the signed forms back the next school day.

Those poor kids and teachers were being used as unpaid extras in the Meghan Show.

Since I was raised to be a lady, I am stopping myself from explicitly writing here what I truly think of Meghan Markle and her beta cuck loser husband who was wired for sound at the event, sitting on the ground listening in awe as his wife read The Stench about the love between father and son to bored, uncomprehending (many fatherless to boot) innocent kids who had anticipated they would be in for a fun festive visit by an important and generous couple. Instead they were used by the:

Universe’s Top Grifters.
Sandie said…
https://archive.ph/2023.09.28-145126/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-12570901/Did-Harry-Meghan-visit-Eugenie-Jack-Invictus-Games-Portuguese-magazine-claims-Sussexes-flew-Alentejo-Princess-husband-home.html

DM has all the details ... after the IG, they flew to Portugal to spend time with Eugenie and Jack before heading back to California for the Costner event.
There is an article in the Telegraph today:
Prince Harry and Meghan’s secret romantic break to Portugal after Invictus Games
Duke and Duchess of Sussex are believed to have stayed with Princess Eugenie and her family

Maneki Neko said…
Meghan Markle's Suits costar Patrick J. Adams DELETES behind-the-scenes Instagram images of the Duchess on set and APOLOGIZES for posting them

Meghan Markle's former Suits costar Patrick J. Adams has apologized for sharing a series of never-before-seen snaps of the Duchess on set, claiming that they posed as a 'distraction' from the actors' strike and calling it an 'embarrassing oversight.


What had that got to do with the actors'strike? It's more likely that the doucheass demanded that the photos be deleted. I wonder what will happen to some dodgy scenes that she filmed.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-12572179/Meghan-Markle-Suits-costar-Patrick-J-Adams-apologizes-deletes-unreleased-images.html

Maneki Neko said…
I forgot to mention in my previous post that the doucheass is described as a "mother of three"😆. Mind you, the DM is not known for its accuracy.
Fifi LaRue said…
If there aren't photos of the Dook and Dookass in Portugal, then it didn't happen. More fake PR.
SwampWoman said…
Maneki Neko said...
I forgot to mention in my previous post that the doucheass is described as a "mother of three"😆. Mind you, the DM is not known for its accuracy.


The DM was probably counting PH as one of the children.
Sandie said…
Patrick Adams tweeted about Suits with a photo with TBW in it. He not only deleted the post and apologized (some burble about the strike) but changed his handle. The thread below reckons he was threatened by his bestie (her staff/lawyers) for using her for self promotion.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16up27t/hmmmm_wouldnt_surprise_me/
Girl with a Hat said…
@Sandie,

we're lucky then that she didn't mention the multiverse and all possible dimensions, just the universe.
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16upzju/we_would_be_stupid_to_think_that_the_us_tax/

So NYC paid for their security when they did the fake royal tour. What more do the British royal family and government have to do to make ot clear that they are private citizens and represent neither?
Maneki Neko said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Rebecca said…
Jan Moir in DM:

JAN MOIR: Just when I think do-good dopes of Montecito Harry and Meghan couldn't sink any lower... they go and exceed all negative expectations

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-12572945/JAN-MOIR-Harry-Meghan-sink-lower-exceed-negative-expectations.html
Is the Patrick J Adams story just a set up between him and *?

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16uug29/pr_at_its_best_the_patrick_adamsmeghan_markle_show/
Magatha Mistie said…

Photo-Synthetic

Rachel tossing a bone
to Mike Ross
Suited, then booted
PR driven dross
Quid pro quo
All faux show
The Bar is now set
So ho low…

OCGal said…
@Magatha Mistie, you knocked one out of the park, yet again.

The title of your newest piece: Photo-Synthetic

and the fine ending: So ho low

Ties it into a pretty bow for us. Smashing!

OCGal said…
I can’t quibble with any of this:

Subreddit SaintMeghanMarkle’s Harkle Alphabet Game just ended (thank you to Sandie who originally alerted us, if memory serves) and here are the top chosen words or phrases to describe the loathsome twosome: - cut and pasted -

…”Anyway, fellow Sinners, I appreciate all of you…and with that, I present to you our final roster of the first round of The Harkle Alphabet Game:

A - Aquazurra
B - Backgrid
C - Catastrophic Car Chase
D - Dog Bowl
E - Elizabeth Arden Cream
F - Fucking Grifters
G - Guttural Moaning
H - Hertz
I - ILBW
J - Just Harry
K - Knauf, Jason
L - Liars
M - Markled
N - Narcissist
O - One tear, left eye, GO!
P - Privasay
Q - Quitters
R - Recollections may vary
S - South Park
T - Todger
U - Uvalde…Unforgivable
V - Voetsek Meghan
W - Worldwide Privacy Tour
X - (e)X-royals
Y - Yacht Girl
Z - Z-listers”

Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16untdj/the_harkle_alphabet_game_thats_a_wrap/
VetusSacculi said…
I read that Senator Dianne Feinstein has passed away so I guess the previous chatter about MM’s political ambitions is going to open up again.
Sandie said…
@MM
The bar is now so low that methinks perhaps there is no bar at all!

The following video is doing the rounds. HG Tudor has two possible explanations for her bizarre behaviour (the actual clip starts just after 7 minutes):

https://youtu.be/7KV-32hfp4o?si=BMmdIkXSlG40iQWP

Compare her behaviour to her husband's and those around her. It looks so weird. She is putting on an act and looking at others to either get cues or to 'act along with her', or both.
Sandie said…
Interesting ... from this Reddit post:

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16v8ai9/appalling_and_insensitive_and_possibly_quite_a/

-----
The Sociopath next door' - by Dr. Martha Stout

An excerpt from this book by the brilliant Dr. Martha Stout (a clinical psychologist, and an expert in Sociopaths) deals precisely with just this personality type, and even this kind of behaviour. She describes a sociopath she has encountered (with a fake name) who has completely faked her qualifications as a psychologist, and bullies those she envies at her workplace*:

*"In the parking area...*she makes sure to park her car (a BMW) beside Jemma's rusted out Escort, a convenient visual comparison to remind Jenna of their relative places in the world."...

"She... is a covetous sociopath*... Since it is not possible to steal... - Beauty, intelligence, success, a strong character -* the covetous sociopath sets about besmirching or damaging enviable qualities in others... diminishing other people is her only means of being powerful.

Retribution - usually against people who have no idea they are being targeted... is her highest priority."

* The good news: She, like MM - gets found out in the end. :-)
xxxxx said…
I came across this:
https://www.jns.org/jewish-and-israeli-sports/idf/23/9/21/320753/

“Prince Harry requested a separate meeting and spent 30 minutes meeting the team. He shook everyone’s hands. Our chairman of ZDVO, Edan Kleiman, is also here, heading our delegation,” she said.

_____________

Hapless had a private 30 minute meeting with the Israeli athletes at Invictus. Megs will be sure to tell her new management that is a mostly Jewish agency.
Opus said…
She looks as if she is going to cry. $24,000 to be ignored is money well spent. Is Costner still a big star? I liked Waterworld - well some of it.
Sandie said…
She is unravelling ... check out her message to SmartWorks:

"women across the UK who have walked into your doors"

The punctuation of the last sentence of the second paragraph completely unravels.

...

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16vfjey/tw_celebrates_smart_works_anniversary/

The staff of the Prince and Princess of Wales have put out social media posts with errors (not often but it happens), but this I do not understand. TBW does not have a job or a public role. She has staff. She knew that anniversary was coming up and had plenty of time to get it right, even send a video message. Between her and her staff, they could not get this right?
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16vezr5/hello_im_meghan_markle_and_im_desperate_for/

That video clip HG Tudor analysed is also on Reddit. Bizarre!
Strange that H at least seems to assume that it's entirely up to him &* whether they return to the UK, though there are elements in the press (republicans?) asserting that CRIII would be making a big mistake to keep them out.

Thank goodness they aren't here - she can't use Sycamore Gap as a photo op or, worse, the crash of the school bus in Cheshire. I'm tempted to see parallels between her behaviour and that of those who wreak destruction in order to get off on the sense of power it gives them.
SwampWoman said…
Opus said...
She looks as if she is going to cry. $24,000 to be ignored is money well spent. Is Costner still a big star? I liked Waterworld - well some of it.


Apparently the series "Yellowstone" has escaped your attention (grin). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suobrMPBLlo
OCGal said…
I know this was posted earlier, but no-one has mentioned what she did at the 8 second mark: she deliberately opened the top area of her dress to let as much skin and non-existent cleavage show as possible

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16vezr5/hello_im_meghan_markle_and_im_desperate_for/

At the 21/22 second mark she has a wild, dangerous, unhinged look flash in her eyes that I have literally only ever before seen in animals infected with rabies.

If I saw a wild animal with that look in its eyes, and those erratic movements, I would flee, or pepper spray it.

I will quit my thought process while I’m ahead.
OCGal said…
I just came up with another apt name for the two grifting losers:

Feral and Feeble Harkle
SwampWoman said…

Blogger Wild Boar Battle-maid said...
Strange that H at least seems to assume that it's entirely up to him &* whether they return to the UK, though there are elements in the press (republicans?) asserting that CRIII would be making a big mistake to keep them out.


I would *assume* that is accurate. They can return all they want. That doesn't mean that they will get any face-to-face meetings, a spare palace, and unlimited funds to maintain their lifestyles. KCIII is on record as wanting to downsize the monarchy. It seems to me, although I may be wrong, that he would not be able to downsize the monarchy if he gave special privileges to his failure-to-fledge ne'er-do-well son.
Girl with a Hat said…
@OCGal, good post!

She's unhinged.
Fifi LaRue said…
@OCGal and Others: Thanks for the reference to the clip and HG. IMO she's glitching, plus high as a kite. Bizarre behavior worthy of pepper spray.
Sandie said…
https://www.hellomagazine.com/celebrities/503644/kevin-costner-thanks-prince-harry-meghan-markle-for-incredible-weekend-photos/

According to Hello!, Costner is besties with the duo. Although he does not name them in his post, he does post a photo that includes them.
SwampWoman said…
I looked at glitch witch today (oops, yesterday) shortly after H.G. Tudor released the video. She looked to me to be under the influence of recreational pharmaceuticals while suffering from the (drug-induced) delusion that she is absolutely irresistible AND the most fascinating and attractive person in the room. She certainly draws the eye by her strange behavior. If I were to guess, I'd guess coke is her co-pilot with a generous helping of alcohol because her reactions, while frenzied, seem to me to be a bit behind everybody else. Her mental state? She looks to me to be thisclose to being the person wandering down the street pushing a shopping cart with random belongings while muttering to herself, occasionally screaming and throwing things. I start to feel compassion for her, then I remember how badly she has treated her own family, her former friends, and the late Queen and Prince Philip.

Good morning, y'all, or whatever time it is in your area. It is a little after 2 a.m. here. The dogs have been barking nonstop. I had to grab a high-powered flashlight to make sure that an alligator isn't inside the fence hunting dog for dinner. I didn't see anything but I know that as soon as I start to drop off to sleep, the dogs will start up the barkbarkbark again. There may be wild hogs that are trying to lift the fence and root up the yard. Again. Or they can smell the coyotes that want to run up and snatch the hens and their chicks. Again. This is going to be a long night. If/when they STOP barking, I'll be running out (again) to make sure they haven't been eaten.

So, here I am, sipping a cup of coffee with some collagen protein added to counteract the wrinkles that are probably forming even as I type. I am going to be one grumpy witch in the morning. Thoughts and prayers are probably in order for Swampman because he is going to wake me @ 6 a.m. because we have some errands to do before going shopping...
Maneki Neko said…
@OCGal

Well spotted! * opening the top of her dress to reveal a "non-existent cleavage"! I like your expression. Flicking the sides of the top of the dress apart surreptitiously reminded me of the flicking of her coat on many occasions when (allegedly) pregnant, doing it very quickly thinking no one would notice. There's something not right with that one.

https://youtu.be/zwgX7i5BnAwfeature=shared
Maneki Neko said…
@OCGal

Further to my post (sent too soon), * acts really bizarrely around the 25/26 second mark. She seems to 'drop' as if she was bending her knees, makes really weird gestures and puts her hand over her mouth in exaggerated surprise. Weird in the extreme.
Tim Cook posted photos of himself meeting with the Waleses at Windsor Castle, along with glowing words of praise for them. That should go down well in Montecito.

Popular posts from this blog

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

As Time Passes and We Get Older

 I started thinking about how time passes when reading some of the articles about the birthday.  It was interesting to think about it from the different points of view.  Besides, it kind of fits as a follow up the last post (the whole saga of can the two brothers reunite). So there is the requisite article about how he will be getting all kinds of money willed to him from his great-grandmother.  There were stories about Princess Anne as trustee (and not allowing earliest access to it all).  Whether or not any or all of this is true (there was money for him and/or other kids) has been debated with claims she actually died owing money with the Queen paying the debts to avoid scandal.  Don't know but I seem to remember that royal estates are shrouded from the public so we may not (ever) know. However, strange things like assisting in a book after repeated denials have popped up in legal papers so nothing is ever really predicable.   We are also seein...

The Opening Act of New Adventures in Retail

 I keep thinking things will settle down to the lazy days of spring where the weather is gorgeous and there is a certain sense of peacefulness.  New flowers are coming out. increasing daylight so people can be outside/play and thinking gardening thoughts.  And life is quiet.  Calm. And then something happens like a comet shooting across the sky.  (Out of nowhere it arrives and then leaves almost as quickly.)   An update to a law suit.  Video of the website is released (but doesn't actually promote any specific product which can be purchased from the website).  A delay and then jam is given out (but to whom and possible more importantly - who did not make the list?).  Trophies almost fall (oops).  Information slips out like when the official date of beginning USA residency.  (now, isn't that interesting?) With them, it's always something in play or simmering just below the surface.  The diversity of the endeavors is really ...