Skip to main content

The Opening Act of New Adventures in Retail

 I keep thinking things will settle down to the lazy days of spring where the weather is gorgeous and there is a certain sense of peacefulness.  New flowers are coming out. increasing daylight so people can be outside/play and thinking gardening thoughts.  And life is quiet.  Calm.

And then something happens like a comet shooting across the sky.  (Out of nowhere it arrives and then leaves almost as quickly.)  

An update to a law suit.  Video of the website is released (but doesn't actually promote any specific product which can be purchased from the website).  A delay and then jam is given out (but to whom and possible more importantly - who did not make the list?).  Trophies almost fall (oops).  Information slips out like when the official date of beginning USA residency.  (now, isn't that interesting?)

With them, it's always something in play or simmering just below the surface.  The diversity of the endeavors is really quite impressive.  This award, polo, speech, speech, being a doer of good works, photo with this person, a cooking show is about to start filming (allegedly - but not in her home - unlike Julia who is in Smithsonian), potential to sell dog leashes to jam to cookware.  The only unifying link would be her and therefore being associated with her.  I thought I read that the polls which are more general public than her fans do not indicate a lot of interest in her.  That translates to questions of how supportive will this population then want to buy product?  

The lack of unity could be a problem for them in some ways though.  Some groups like cookware might also do cookbooks but that is less expensive.  So more of them need to be sold to be as profitable.  More could be sold because it was cheaper but also if you didn't like it, you could give it away at the office party white elephant gift exchange.  Most people don't buy/keep an expensive cookbook for the one recipe they like.

Cooking people might not necessarily buy the premade jam except maybe as a one off to test it as worthwhile enough to keep it around and find a (not necessarily hers from the cookbook) recipe.

This brings up the potential problem of one off sales to see if I like it enough to buy it again.  So initial sales are not always indicative of future repeat buyers.

Do the stats support that cooks also have dogs and even open to a cross sell?  Or this and that interests (I don't remember all the different potential options but it had a kitchen sink feel to the list)?  To be successful, that means a lot of purchases, well, everything.  Everything all the time.  And, again and again.  And, new product has to always be in the pipeline to encourage people to buy the new and improved to replace the old and now inferior.

Plus you have to have all this "stuff" made up from somewhere (takes time - is this ethically sourced?) and then ready to ship means sitting somewhere.  Waiting means more time and where is that space? So now this means a warehouse, people to maintain it and the package it for: Shipping - which takes more time (even Amazon doesn't get everything to you the same or next day).  Hold that thought - or ... selling it in some stores.  But even if it is in a store somewhere, you still need a central location to get it to the store.  Plus, selling it in a store means they take their cut so less profitable to the product owner.

Inventory can be expensive to maintain if it isn't moving for some reason or another no matter where it is.  Drop shipping could be risky if the real manufacturer isn't producing the quality you thought you were getting (and there is this big delay in receiving it).  

Not everything will be a big seller so how much of a discount will be needed and when to make that decision in order to move that product?  To offer a discount means to set aside the ego and say: I'm here to make a profit even if it means not as much as I wanted to.  I have purchased some Martha stuff on a discount.

This will be an interesting show to watch unfold.

Comments

abbyh said…
Nutty and us Mods strive as much as possible to make this a welcome and friendly blog. Please do keep in mind that everyone posts with the risk of potential dissent, criticism, and unpopularity. We depend on Nutties to keep this place respectful and hopefully fun.


This blog may or may not be the blog you are looking for. If not, we wish you well and hope you find what you are looking for.


Guidelines for this blog is as follows:

-Keep discussions on the Sussexes. Politics must be strictly related to their involvement. Off topic subjects are permissible but should be limited and are subject to the discretion of Mods.
-Be civil and courteous in discussions.
-Posters who are disruptive will not have their posts posted.
-Anonymous or unknown posts are not allowed.
-We know that some of this is not family friendly. It can be a fine line sometimes on the topics such as sex and sexuality. Try to lean towards family friendly (thanks).
-Profanity has not traditionally been a problem, so let's keep it that way.
-We never encourage vindictive or other harmful actions.
-Please try to keep the conspiracy theories down.
-Do not discuss the blog, blog history, or other posters.
-No personal attacks both direct and indirect.
-Please de-escalate "fights" by dropping the subject.
-Please remember that the focus of the blog is on others, not any individuals posting here. So if your name is not attached to something posted, please begin with the idea that what is written is not likely to be directed at you if it upsets you.
-Posts which may be deemed too many flat statements/too provocative or exceptionally mean spirited may not posted on the blog.
-Remember that not every one who reads the posts is happy about what is posted here.
-Your privacy matters.
-Remember that certain sites require prior approval for reuse such as Harry Markle. Please respect their request. Links to share is a great alternative.


Mods do their best to ensure the guidelines are met. However, lapses happen because moderating this blog is a 24/7 responsibility and we all have jobs and families (and laundry) to care for. If you see overlooked issues, please feel free to message us so we can address them.

Thank you again for all your patience and support.

Moderation on.
snarkyatherbest said…
i think we have one of many story lines emerging: maybe kids should visit england. my guess she puts it out there. she doesn’t go. says they are in the custody of the elderly sick monarch because yeah the law. and voila no kids and more time for looking for me good gold bars. 😉. harry’s problem. not hers and she now a victim. she probably isn’t getting any money out of the brf from the brf if she and hairball divorce. so if she can’t monetize time to cut them loose and onto the next “deal” /“grift” but get the poor mom without her children. aw. likeable again? probably not but it could soften her image.

interesting on the domicile change in the lawsuit back dated to last year. why now? cali is a community property state. hmmm are debts equally shared too? i am so curious why now. did someone go to the lawyer or the judge and point out the address is wrong they are not legally allowed to reside there. and it does bring up the counsellor of state thing again but the domicile change was last year so any change in the COS looks less petty. you H acknowledged you have no UK domicile. or does he really want it that way so he can look the victim when inevitably something moved on COS. has he adopted the mrs victim narrative. will she be happy if poor harry gets better polling than poo meghan. so curious.

figured i would post in the new thread.

and thanks abbyh for the recipe.
Maneki Neko said…
Strange

Meghan Markle's American Riviera Orchard brand website leads to British foodbank and message saying 'thoughts with Catherine' - after mystery buyer snapped up UK domain name

The Duchess of Sussex's new American Riviera Orchard lifestyle brand has been hijacked by what appears to be a Princess Kate fan.

While the American web link takes you to the Duchess' website for her business venture, the UK domain name has been purchased by someone who has linked it to a food bank and message saying 'thoughts with Catherine'.

Fans clicking on the link 'americanriveriaorchard.uk' will be taken to a page asking for donations for the UK-based charity - and discover a very pointed message.

While the home page states 'Forgiveness. Permission. Please donate to the Trussell Trust', clicking on this will lead to a Just Giving fundraiser for the Trussell Trust charity.

'not Meghan. hope Meghan wouldn't mind. thoughts with catherine X,' the cryptic message reads.

The message of support to the Princess of Wales comes after she revealed she had been diagnosed with cancer last month and was undergoing chemotherapy.

As soon as users open the website they are met with the cryptic words 'forgiveness' and 'permission' before encouraging people to 'please donate to the Trussell Trust'.

It seems unlikely that the domain was bought by Meghan's representatives with those who have donated suggesting a Good Samaritan was responsible for buying up the domain.

The Trussell Trust confirmed to MailOnline that it did not set up the webpage and had been unaware of the donation site.

Sophie Carre, Director of Public Engagement at the Trussell Trust, said: 'The Trussell Trust are grateful to people who put their time and energy into supporting our work to end the need for food banks in the UK.

The charity is not connected with this website domain and have no knowledge of who set it up.'

So far the spoof page has raised £56 out of its £1,000 target with one US-based donator writing: 'I am happy to support from across the pond and am glad to know of this organization through the link on the American Riviera Orchards website.'
Etc.

Not sure * will like the reference to Catherine.

Incidentally, lemon curd is very easy to find here in any supermarket, I didn't realise it wasn't in the US.

https://tinyurl.com/2kc9dyw6
Yahoo News has recently featured several H & * stories rom the Scottish paper, the Daily Record. Most are unremarkable but this one has me scratching my head:

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/prince-harry-meghan-markle-difficult-095217513.html


It's this:
`However, during her tenure as a working royal, Meghan only made one trip to the Aberdeenshire estate - in 2018 with the Queen, just months after she and Harry were married.'

Is my memory failing? I didn't think she's ever been. We were given the silly story about how they'd be there for *'s birthday, complete with Queen-baked cake. I'm sure we'd have heard her criticism of the place, had she been . Neither Diana nor Margaret Thatcher liked the place and I can't imagine * being any different. Didn't we say she only wanted to go as Her Majesty lay dying?
Sandie said…
@abbyh
Bless you a million times! I live just outside a small country town where no one has heard of lemon curd, so I have to make it or live without. Lemon curd is scary difficult to cook on a stove, for me, so your microwave recipe is a amazing!
----------

Jar number 21 has duly posted. The fifth person to acknowledge the gift. Yes, the flowers look wilted. My guess is that the gift was stuck in the pantry and a 'gentle' reminder from TBW resulted in a belated photograph and posting on social media.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1c70tim/roll_up_no_5_with_jar_21_tracee_ellis_ross/

----------
I am a mean girl chuckling! Highgrove sells jams and preserves and marmalades. Their stock of strawberry preserves (with a twist of lemon) was sold out as a response to TBW launching her strawberry jam by sending 'carefully' presented free jars to maybe as many as 50 influencers, of which 5 have posted on social media after how many days? Three? Has TBW sold out? Nope. She has sold nothing because she has a strange business plan.

https://archive.ph/2024.04.18-092602/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13322301/Meghan-Markles-jam-boosts-sales-King-Royal-fans-rush-buy-Charles-6-95-strawberry-preserve-range-selling-days-Duchess-launch.html
Maneki Neko said…
@Wild Boar

No, your memory is not failing. TBW never went near Balmoral. I can't imagine her in the Scottish countryside, and can you see her attending the Highland games? She put out a story about going there and the Queen baking her a cake, as you said.

Elsewhere,Yahoo!Life said in Sep 2019 'But the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who welcomed son Archie Harrison in May, have declined an invitation to visit this year, according to a UK newspaper.'
https://uk.style.yahoo.com/meghan-markle-balmoral-prince-harry-092759424.html

The AberdeenLibe website says, on the other hand, 'However, during her time as a working royal, Meghan only managed one trip there with the Queen - in 2018 in the months after she and Harry tied the knot.'
https://www.aberdeenlive.news/news/aberdeen-news/prince-harry-meghan-markle-balmoral-8645358

Confusing but like you I'm pretty sure * never stepped foot north of the border.
Sandie said…
@WBBM
Fake news. She never visited Balmoral, and only wanted to once: when the late Queen died.

They did spend their first Christmas after marriage at Sandringham, and then never went back there.

@Maneki Neko
The perils of thinking you have talents you do not have! Gone are the days when she would buy up every domain name possible, including royal titles before she supposedly met her prince. The launch comes across as hasty and not thought through or done professionally.

I bit the bullet and checked her IG account: nothing about the promo jars of jam she sent to her influencer friends. They have updated the news page on their sussex.com website, but nothing about ARO or jams. What are their news items on the sussex.com website?

Travalyst Annual Convening 2024 (oh stop with the word salad ... it was a meeting!)

Sentebale Polo Challenge ("The Duchess was among the many esteemed guests in attendance and presented the trophy to the winning team." esteemed: held in great respect; admired.)

Two New Archewell Productions (see separate post)

Betterup Uplift 2024

An Evening of Art (loads of pompous word salad about their evening out at The Kinsey African American Art and History Collection)

PRINCE HARRY HONOURS THE DIANA AWARDS’ LEGACY AWARD RECIPIENTS
----------

Busy bees aren't they? I suppose it is useful to have a collation of all their appearances.
Sandie said…
And here it is ... their introduction to the two new Archewell Productions:

----------
Archewell Productions is pleased to share that two new nonfiction series are in production at Netflix as part of its multi-year overall deal. One series, curated by Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex, and in partnership with The Intellectual Property Corporation (a part of Sony Pictures Television), will celebrate the joys of cooking & gardening, entertaining, and friendship. The other, shot primarily at the US Open Polo Championship in Wellington, Florida at The USPA National Polo Center, and in partnership with Boardwalk Pictures, will provide viewers with unprecedented access to the world of professional polo. Known primarily for its aesthetic and social scene, the series will pull the curtain back on the grit and passion of the sport, capturing players and all it takes to compete at the highest level. Both shows are in various stages of production and their titles and release dates will be announced in the coming months.
----------
And some grandiose boasting, and a mission statement that does not make sense:

----------
About Archewell Productions: Founded in 2020 by Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Archewell Productions is dedicated to illuminating thought-provoking and diverse narratives that underscore our common humanity and celebrate community – through scripted and non-scripted TV, film, documentaries, and podcasting. Archewell Productions has released three nonfiction series including “Heart of Invictus,” “Harry & Meghan,” and “Live to Lead.” “Harry & Meghan” debuted on Netflix with a total of 81.55 million hours watched in its first week, making it the highest viewing time of any documentary to debut on the streaming service in its premiere week.
Sandie said…
There is more ... but how do these companies fit in with their mission statement?

----------
About The Intellectual Property Corporation: The Intellectual Property Corporation (IPC), a part of Sony Pictures Television, is an Emmy-winning content creation and production studio based in Van Nuys, California. Founded in 2016 by Eli Holzman and Aaron Saidman, IPC develops and produces premium television, film, documentary, commercial and interactive mobile content for global streamers and US broadcast and cable networks. Recent productions include Indian Matchmaking and Night Stalker (Netflix); Secrets of Playboy (A&E); Selena + Chef (Max & Food Network) and The Climb (Max); We’re Here and The Swamp (HBO); Death in the Dorms, The D’Amelio Show, and RapCaviar Presents (Hulu); The Last Narc (Amazon); Empires of New York (CNBC); and The Con (ABC). IPC is a two-time Emmy Award recipient and a Producers Guild Award recipient for its series Leah Remini: Scientology & the Aftermath (A&E).
----------

They don't have much to say about this company but it seems they focus on characters rather than story:

----------
About Boardwalk Pictures: Boardwalk Pictures is an award-winning production company that creates non-fiction, character-driven entertainment for audiences across the globe. As creators and producers of some of today’s most recognizable premium television shows and feature films, Boardwalk Pictures continues to push the boundaries of unscripted entertainment.
----------

Boardwalk have done dozens of shows, so they know what they are doing. Scroll through the list. Goop plus some cooking shows are on the list.

https://boardwalkpics.com/
SwampWoman said…
There's that 'curated' word again which she seems to particularly love. Okay, Curate Meghan, we see you.
snarkyatherbest said…
just you wait. if we get a version of Abbyh’s lemon curd we will know that someone is reading thr blog 😉



SwampWoman said…
snarkyatherbest said...
just you wait. if we get a version of Abbyh’s lemon curd we will know that someone is reading thr blog 😉


Ha! It will probably be the first recipe and she made it for the Queen!
Girl with a Hat said…
@Swamp Woman,

I think she means "cure rate" and it's about that untreatable form of syphilis.
Sandie said…
https://youtu.be/cERZ8zBJ7b4?si=aWSBxCdnBjBWRTQD

I think Palace Confidential this week is fun. The story about Princess Margaret is epic!
Sandie said…
From a long and in-depth article:

----------
While Spotify has already washed its hands of the Sussexes, Netflix is still trying to work with them. As Michael Pachter, a managing director at Wedbush Securities who's covered movies, entertainment, and tech for two decades, explained, it's because they've still got that $100 million deal. It's one of many such agreements Netflix signed with big names when it was trying to better establish itself and get eyeballs, including with Barack and Michelle Obama, Ryan Murphy, and Shonda Rhimes.

"The $100 million at the time sounded like a good idea, and who knew that the two of them would be such duds on camera?" Pachter said.

It's possible one or both shows could take off like their personal documentary did. There's still juice in the Meghan and Harry storyline. Netflix may be hoping there'll be some halo effect from "Suits," the 2010s-era legal drama Markle was in that recently became a Netflix hit.

The shows being proposed now will likely be relatively inexpensive to make — it's not wildly costly to pay a camera crew to film Harry playing polo or Meghan cooking something in her kitchen (if that's what her show turns out to be). Productivity prospects may be better here because Meghan and Harry won't really have to do much of anything extra except exist as themselves. Harry won't need to come up with a podcast concept, which he reportedly struggled to do with Spotify — he just has to ride a horse. And maybe just keeping on good terms with the Sussexes is worth it in case more drama erupts from the royal family. Perhaps Prince Harry decides to try to get back into the royal fold and documents that. A public breakup with Meghan and Harry may also be a mess Netflix doesn't want to deal with.
But barring some juicy new development or a sudden turnaround in viewer interest, Netflix could decide to throw in the towel, but unlike Spotify, the streamer might not be able to recoup any of the $100 million from the Sussexes.

"Netflix can cancel this anytime they want and just pay them the unpaid amount," Pachter said. "And maybe they will do that if they keep messing around with the formula and can't find anything. They're not going to waste their time if nobody watches it."

https://archive.ph/2024.04.18-100622/https://www.businessinsider.com/meghan-markle-prince-harry-new-netflix-shows-suits-spotify-deal-2024-4
Maneki Neko said…
@Sandie

The perils of thinking you have talents you do not have!

Yes. This in spite of her being 'whip smart' and having a 'freakish attention to detail'. She must have been in a hurry to launch her website.
Girl with a Hat said…
https://twitter.com/takebackusofa/status/1780753624685048092

did she rip off this jam company? this tweet says that reddit is on fire about it
snarkyatherbest said…
SwampWoman. we’ll abbyh is our queen

Girl In the Hat. too early for me. i do t have coffee to spit out laughing at your cure rate comment. oh boy that was good!!
snarkyatherbest said…
Random Thoughts

why jam? Meg’s secret nod to the state of affairs in montecito and questions about the kids. “i’m in a jam”. next product Pickles. i’m in a real pickle here

so we have a pic of M and two friends with 60s love in nine and a reminder to all they are mothers because duh it says it on the t shirt. hmmm is this a way of reminding the work she is a “mom” without displaying the kids. oh i long for the days we had a back of the head or a foot to show there was a baby/child somewhere
abbyh said…
I saw that article, thought like you but it is actually a charity supporting kids who are (possible were) in foster care and became a mother at a very young age. The idea behind it is that they are more likely to fall through cracks, don't know what they don't know, not graduate, not get a decent job, become homeless and so on.

Sounds like a decent idea but no idea about their financials.


Sandie said…
Nacho is the latest recipient to promote her jam. Someone on Reddit noticed that his jar had a different number on it. I am posting a reference because the story is buried way way down the DM home page.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13326985/Nacho-Figueras-says-loves-Meghan-Markles-jam-days-wife-Delfina-Blaquier-teased-product-joins-PR-bandwagon-American-Riviera-Orchard.html

@snarkyatherbest
Pickles ...LOL!

I find it impossible to believe that she could make AOL work as a business.
Sandie said…
https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/27425257/meghan-markle-brand-instagram-royal/

Hijacking her name to fundraise for the Trussell Trust was a brilliant move ... turning her trashy attention seeking into an opportunity to do something worthwhile and positive. I hope the idea catches on and is used in other places where people have snapped up domain names that she failed to secure.
I have tried to find out who told the world press that Harry's wife was "whip smart". I can't find the source so I presume that it was the wifey herself, you know that uneducated moron of a woman who could not learn few words of "God save the Queen" and was crying the cruelness of the Brits in the Oprah interview because she was forced to look it in Google.

Youtuber Lost beyond Pluto has two excellent videos about the ladies who had done all that and more and succeeded. True ladies of quality in European royal houses and American dollar princesses (my favourite is Mary Leiter, baroness Curzon of Kedleston and vicereine of India 1870-1906).

Harry's wife has lived in the USA for four years and that is her own turf, or?

No one respects her in Hollywood. She has totally failed in everything she has done. So why does she not MOAN and WHINGE about the racism and injustice in her own country where her welcome has not been as warm as it was in 2018 in Britain? Where is the endless explaining away that nothing is her own fault and that the Americans are horrible towards her and try to make her fail?

I just ask humbly because are having different sauces for geese and ganders here?
Maneki Neko said…
@Sandie

Hijacking her name to fundraise for the Trussell Trust was a brilliant move ...

It was and it's getting better. DM headline and a couple of paragraphs:

'Kate Middleton fans donate £11,000 to fundraising page after UK domain for Meghan Markle's lifestyle brand was hijacked and redirected to it

While the American web link takes you to the Duchess' website for her business venture, the UK domain name has been purchased by someone who has linked it to a food bank and message saying 'thoughts with Catherine'.

Now, Kate Middleton fans have donated £11,649, as of now on the site, to the Trussell Trust which works to end the need for food banks in the UK.’
. . . . . .
I think the money will go up a lot more. The website will make more in a week than Megsy and her pots of jam in a year. I wonder if TOW will sue the Trussell Trust...
snarkyatherbest said…
remember the whole kerry kennedy sponsored award for the harkles. well read this thread from the New Jersey for Kennedy campaign in response to parts of the family supporting biden and not RFKjr. ouch. a lot of grifting allegations about her non-profit birds of a feather ?

https://x.com/kennedy24nj/status/1781363829147849128?s=46&t=YXyXKJ_wC7rBPDWFwIRuLg
Girl with a Hat said…
@Snarkyatherbest,

glad you appreciated it.
Magatha Mistie said…

@GWAH
Quid pro ho 😘



Sandie said…
https://archive.ph/2024.04.20-000145/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/prince-harry-charity-african-parks-torture-gx5l0rv25

The African Parks problem is not going away.

The way this organization operates is completely contrary to how most of Africans do. Local communities must be integrated into conservation areas and must benefit from the preservation and protection of wildlife. What African Parks do seems to be the complete opposite.

If hapless had sone backbone and integrity, he would be in Africa, talking to people and driving change to stop this abuse. He would have to admit that William was right and he was wrong in the approach to and philosophy of wildlife conservation in Africa.
Sandie said…
Interesting, but for fun (and adjacent to the duo) ... tarot readings indicate that Catherine is worried that organizations she supports are losing money and is keen to do something to help; William is happy at home, but wants Catherine to stay at home and rest and recover ... trouble looming in some way (Tower)?

https://www.tumblr.com/mysteriouslytransparentwitch/748271136193773568/mini-reading-tarot-catherine-20-april-2024?source=share


https://www.tumblr.com/mysteriouslytransparentwitch/748268393307783168/mini-reading-tarot-prince-william-20-april-2024?source=share
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1c8oldo/you_too_can_sound_pretentious/


For fun, has anyone tried this?

My brand name would be: Coastal Chestnut Meadow. It makes me sound like a very confused person!
Sandie said…
Someone claiming to have a source st Vogue says they have been invited to this year's Met Gala. This is the theme:

----------
This year's dress code is inspired by J.G. Ballard's 1962 book "The Garden of Time," which tells the story of a count and countess who live in a villa that overlooks an extraordinary garden being intruded upon by a mob.

The vivid, thought-provoking short story is often seen to act as a metaphor for the evolution of human history and the endless cycle of creation and destruction...
----------

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1c8srgc/ive_heard_a_rumor_that_they_will_be_at_the_met/
Girl with a Hat said…
@Sandie

Tropical Hickory Prairie for me
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1c8w1nm/who_is_jam_jar_3_abigail_is_like_the_only_other/

Who got jar 3? Genuine question as I do not know, but the colour of the hand and swimming pool and marble countertop may be clues?

I have no idea what the source of the video is, i.e. who posted it.
snarkyatherbest said…
sandie im gonna guess. i invite. bezos i believe are cochairing. can’t imagine the finance would be keen to have limelight taken away from her by mere english adjacent royalty 😉
Girl with a Hat said…
Lainey Lui of laineygossip.com made a big deal of the jam scam by *

It's interesting because Lainey, who used to report about * frequently, has gone pretty quiet on that front for about 1 year now.

Lainey even tried to lure people over to her substrack chat room which is behind a paywall

It makes me think that * sent Lainey a jar of jam scam and Lainey decided to a bit of PR for * rather than admit she got a jar.
Sandie said…
@GWAH
Your brand name is a winner ... definitely!

@snarkyatherbest
There is a connection: Bezos and Sanchez are friends with the Kardashians, who are friends with Doria.
According to Neil Sean Harry has some weird idea that he still has a future in the forefront of the Royal life in Britain.

They (H and wife) had great ideas of a shared kingship and queenship with William and Catherine and that they could play a power couple role equal with the Waleses.

Tell me if they are strange or are they TRULY strange!
Maneki Neko said…
In case you were waiting excitedly for *'s new show, hoping to see the children, they remain invisible.

'Archie and Lilibet will not feature in Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's new Netflix shows, which are set to explore the couple's love of 'polo, gardening, entertaining and friendship'.'

I wonder who the neighbours are who are so kindly lending their kitchen for the show. Or will the house be rented by the day? What about the garden? The Harkles' or somebody else's? Same with entertaining. TBW loves to surround herself with mystery. She probably thinks it makes her ventures/projects more interesting.
Sandie said…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13331805/Princess-Beas-hit-Spotify-grifters-spat-Harry-Meghan-writes-EMILY-PRESCOTT.html

Interesting ... Princess Beatrice has been working with Spotify, quietly, because of her expertise, not as a podcaster:

----------
I can reveal that last week Beatrice, 35, attended an industry event at Spotify's London office, where she hosted a discussion about the future of technology.

Joining her were former Warner Bros Discovery boss Priya Dogra and Sakshi Chhabra Mittal, founder of science-based meal delivery service Foodhak.

Beatrice, eldest daughter of Prince Andrew and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, is no stranger to tech.

Since 2017, she has been Vice-President of Partnerships and Strategy at US software and data firm Afiniti.

She is also, I can reveal, director of a company called BY-EQ, which she set up in 2022 under the unassuming name Beatrice York.
----------

Meanwhile, the grifters are sending strawberry jam to influencers and filming themselves at polo!
Sandie said…
A tarot reading, the essence seems to say that she is pretending that everything is wonderful but it is not, and that she really needs the royal connection?

----------
mini reading tarot meghan markle 20 april 2024

so, there are masks currently, Meghan has the impression that her past or her future is hindered, she must wear a mask that everything is fine, that there is a lot of abundance. When in reality abundance is always in bloom.
We cling to the community and power it (the royal family) indirectly.
She appreciated the little interest it offered her.
She has a lot of desire to make a lot of money and finally transform herself and herself financially.
are we trying to find a financial arrangement with a king? Is there a compromise with justice? we try to balance our actions, our emotions to move forward and overcome our difficulties.
Is there anything new related to the BRF or heritage or organization?
what still brings financial imbalance?
there is something happening in a financial and/or professional process.
There is a king of swords who made a decision which leads to the rook then a 5 of swords, difficulty in several areas (netflix?)

https://www.tumblr.com/mysteriouslytransparentwitch/748303010087763968/mini-reading-tarot-meghan-markle-20-april-2024?source=share
Sandie said…
@barkjack makes comments about the 'big Spring reveal' Lady C talked about (probably meant her updated book):

----------
It’s not unnoticed how the increase in abuse and hatred toward P&POW rose sharply to a level never seen before, precisely as H&M fine tuned an online support network.
----------
I am not one to say big news is coming Spring. This narrative, peddled by Lady C.

Made clear, I’m aware of LoS amendment considerations which av since stalled & top secret investigation into online h8 activity toward BRF.

Originally I speculated Los matters could drag into 2025
----------
I should add here that Lady C and Dan especially are quite credible at times and spot on with their info/analysis, altho to be clear I say I’m ‘in the dark’ about the supposed Spring news just as much as everyone.
----------
The results of one (investigation) may very well determine the outcome of another. Absolutely.

https://twitter.com/BarkJack_/status/1773718667924029826
SwampWoman said…
Girl with a Hat said...
@Swamp Woman,

I think she means "cure rate" and it's about that untreatable form of syphilis.


ROFL! Yes, I didn't think of that! Thank you for bringing up something that may be of great interest to her!
I saw an amended photo of H in today's Sunday Times, accompanying mention of his `new' residence. He'd been given a speech bubble proclaiming,

`For tax purposes, I'm registered under the name of Angela Rayner.'

If a narcissist does not want to show you her Palace of Sixteen Flushing Toilets and it's kitchen it means that the place is not up to scratch and that humiliates her.

That she does not show her children, well maybe she knows that they are going to have more international attention than she ever had and that humiliates her even more.
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1c9newo/jamscam2024_thirsty_abigail_spencer_posing_at_the/

Abigail Spencer posing with jam jar 6, in a cocktail dress, lying on the lawn, playing with a dog.
`This jam is my jam'?
Such democratic jam!

`This jam is your jam and this jam is my jam
From the California to the New York island
From the redwood forest to the Gulf Stream waters
This jam was made for you and me

As I went walking that ribbon of highway
I saw above me that endless skyway
Saw below me that golden valley
This jam was made for you and me

I roamed and rambled and I followed my footsteps
To the sparkling sands of her diamond deserts
All around me a voice was sounding
This jam was made for you and me

When the sun comes shining then I was strolling
And the wheat fields waving and the dust clouds rolling
A voice come chanting as the fog was lifting
This jam was made for you and me

This jam is your jam and this jam is my jam
From California to the New York island
From the redwood forest to the Gulf Stream waters
This jam was made for you and me'

Pretentious? Moi?

(With apologies to Woody Guthrie and Miss Piggy)
Perhaps *'s brand should be `Maman Maléfique'.
Maneki Neko said…
For a lot more class than a jar of Montecito jam, you can have the full range of Highgrove products. Not just preserves but biscuits, teas, confectionery etc. and also soaps, clothing and accessories, gifts and more. International shipping is available.

https://www.highgrovegardens.com/collections
In the discussion about the Harkles wedding cake on SSMM, it's mentioned that it was made by a very small business, of which the owner became highly stressed.

I've just realised that it was anther case of Copy-cat Markle - I'd heard the story about one of the cakes made in 1947 for the then-Princess Elizabeth & Philip Mountbatten. One of the several cakes made for them was baked and iced by a small-town baker in Somerset. I think I heard the story on the radio from the baker's daughter.

It's recorded in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Elizabeth_and_Philip_Mountbatten%27s_wedding_cakes, under the heading `Real and Holton, Somerset'.
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1ca78te/meghans_wedding_speech/

The full text of her wedding speech ... how many red flags can you find?

In the first sentence, I find one. "first of all, it's been a while". Right there she is throwing the gauntlet down ... I will say and do whatever I want, and I really do not care about anyone else.

She thanks or acknowledges no one in this speech. It is only about her and her fantasy love. Is that normal in a wedding speech?
VetusSacculi said…
@WBBM said: Perhaps *'s brand should be `Maman Maléfique'.

I'd be more direct and just go for Mauvaise Maman
snarkyatherbest said…
i’m still confused why she paired her strawberry jam with lemons. is she trying to tell us her brand is “tart”. yeah i get it 😉 kudos for leaning in M
Maneki Neko said…
Bonne Maman means granny/grandma, not good mother, but mauvaise maman/maman maléfique would be apt. Actually, that's not grand enough, I'm surprised * didn't go for something like Royal Sussex/Duchess' Choice etc.
Elskainga said…
Interesting post by SecondHandCoke who has insider sources in Hollywood. I agree that Netflix buying and streaming either of their films is far from certain. Harry’s Polo film if done well could be entertaining but after being “surprised and blindsided by Harry’s CBS Invictus special, there may be payback by NF. *’s cooking series, not so much.

https://twitter.com/sage1411/status/1782383053098062045
Maneki Neko said…
Why Meghan's podcast has hit a snag before it even begins: Duchess's much-heralded new Archetypes audio shows are put on ice 'until next year at the earliest' while she focuses on her lifestyle brand, reveals RICHARD EDEN
Excerpts


Prince Harry's wife announced amid great fanfare in February that she had signed a deal with Lemonada Media, a female-founded company that wants to 'make life suck less'.

The Duchess, who produced only one series of her podcast Archetypes for Spotify before parting ways with the company, had signed with Lemonada to develop and host a new series.

However, a source tells me that there is not expected to be any work broadcast this year. 'The relaunch of Meghan's Archetypes podcast got pushed back to 2025,' the California-based source says.

It is understood that Lemonada did not want the podcast's launch to be overshadowed by the former actress's television series, which she began filming at a rented house in Montecito last week. Netflix said the show would 'celebrate the joys of cooking and gardening, entertaining and friendship'.

Lemonada is said to be concerned that there would also be 'scheduling conflicts' between the launch of its podcasts and that of Meghan's lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard.
-----------
I don't think there's a risk the podcast's launch could be overshadowed by *'s television series. On reflection, could the TV series be as bad or worse than the podcasts? That's a moot point.
Magatha Mistie said…

Merchant of Menace

All pith and skin
pulped and canned
Squeezing the pits
for her tainted home brand
Her candied spiel
for lemonada
Needs a twist, a’peel
*succade
Full blown raspberry
yada yada yada…

*candied peel/fruit




New from The Spectator:

By Lee Cohen

In the annals of recent royal history, few narratives have unfolded with as much drama and tumult as the saga of Prince Harry’s departure from Britain. We (Americans) now find our country the official domicile of an entitled and disgruntled British Prince. Harry filed documents last week to say so. I’m already hearing rapturous cries from our British friends: ‘He’s yours now and good riddance.’ We already have Joe Biden flinging open our border to the masses. Now, to add insult to injury, we have a guy who has made unwelcome intrusions into our domestic politics, and seems to be having trouble with his visa application.

The Duke’s recent change of primary residence from the UK to the US, backdated to 29 June, 2023, (the Sussexes’ departure date from Frogmore Cottage) marks not only a physical relocation but a symbolic break from his family, nation, and heritage – none of which seems to preoccupy him. His decision, driven by purported safety concerns, seems more likely to be fuelled by anger, frustration and shame to the point where the Duke has even considered adopting American citizenship. It is astonishing that a prince of the blood would even flirt with accepting foreign citizenship, but Harry is an outlier in so many senses.

His abandonment of royal duties and flight across the Atlantic represent not only a rupture in the fabric of the Royal Family, but it leaves a void in a threadbare bench of working royals sadly challenged by illness. So too, it lets down a nation that could make use of his service, were that service deemed fit for purpose. Once regarded as a beloved member of the royal family, Harry’s gradual estrangement from his homeland has naturally put off many Britons. Reactions across traditional and social media hardly conceal support for marginalisation of the disruptive and distracting Sussexes from Britain.

The Prince’s actions defy belief. On the one hand he claims to love his family, but in his autobiography, Spare, he savages them mercilessly. He stood by while his wife accused his family of racism. He exposed private information, and through publication of his memoir even disrespected his beloved grandparents. How can the Duke ever be forgiven considering his actions look like an appalling breach of trust? He must never be allowed to do so again. Now firmly ensconced in the USA alongside his wife, Meghan Markle, Harry assured the broadcast Good Morning America he was ‘loving every single day’ in the US. But this sentiment does not flow automatically the other way

While American gossip tabloid audiences follow every new Sussex branding scheme with bated breath, many of us view their exploits with eyerolling disdain. Their penchant for creating distraction, chaos and controversy wherever they go is intolerable. Nor does America need yet another coin-operated B-list celebrity wading into politics. No wonder the couple have become the butt of jokes – from cartoons to comedians – for it is risible – no, preposterous – for lifestyle brand influencers and unsettled foreign princes to inveigh on election misinformation, paid family leave, or America’s free speech protections. Allegations surrounding the disclosure of illegal substance use in the Duke’s autobiography have triggered an investigation into the handling of his US visa, raising questions about both Harry’s handling of the application and the Biden administration’s review of his case.

So, fine. Britain has had enough of its unhappy former golden boy. But here in America, we are not far behind in our feelings. We share the same revulsion when someone appears to sell out one’s family for profit. Moreover, in America, hard work and talent are prized commodities. If the Sussexes’ Hollywood experience is any indication, they are sorely lacking in both of these qualities. The suggestion that they are ‘talentless grifters’ will stick with the pair forever. Now having bit too many times the hand that fed them, Harry and Meghan find themselves casting about for relevance and purpose… selling jam but without Jerusalem.

As Prince Harry newly affirms the USA as his place of residence, many Brits are rejoicing. Ever-more Americans are less cheerful. The common sense of Nigel Farage springs to mind. After Harry’s 2021 assault on the US Constitution’s commitment to free speech, he tweeted: ‘For Prince Harry to condemn the USA’ First Amendment shows he has lost the plot. Soon he will not be wanted on either side of the pond.’ And here we are.
Sandie said…
@Maneki Neko
Yes, it is most odd. Surely a podcast would get more attention by her launching her own 'brand'? Scheduling conflicts? She signed up to make a series of podcasts, but she can't actually do the work because she is putting on an act at the polo for the cameras and she made 50 jars of jam to give to people she knows. Oh, and she did a photo shoot for her brand as well. So very busy!

If she has been working on ARO for a year, why did she sign up with Lemonada if she knew she would not have time to make podcasts (even though many people could actually do both)?
Sandie said…
https://people.com/meghan-markle-prince-harry-announce-changes-pr-team-8637111

They have two new media people, one based in the UK.

----------
Former Director of Global Communications Miranda Barbot has been promoted to the role of Vice President of Programs and Media Operations.

Charlie Gipson and Kyle Boulia have joined the office of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex as communications executives, both reporting to Ashley Hansen, who remains head of communications for the couple.
----------

Two losers need so many people with fancy titles to get them media exposure and good press?
Maneki Neko said…
@Magatha

Thank you for The Merchant of Menace!!! Very good.
"Distraction, chaos and controversy"

Hilarious.

The most interesting question is what are they going to do when money truly stops filling their pockets?

Come back to England and expect the King to feed them?
Sandie said…
@Golden Retriever
Thanks for the Spectator article.

"Moreover, in America, hard work and talent are prized commodities. If the Sussexes’ Hollywood experience is any indication, they are sorely lacking in both of these qualities."

I am not sure that this is entirely true. I would say that society also prizes wealth, and is obsessed with reporting which billionaire is the wealthiest in the world and endlessly reporting on the upward or downward movement of stock, gleefully predicting the downfall of anyone who is successful at the same time. At my most optimistic, I think society will correct itself. Sorry to go on, but social media is a prime example of immaturity and shallowness. Influencers have too much power, and victimhood has become valuable (a guy is suing Musk for millions because he caused him emotional harm in a careless post, which he then retracted and apologized for).

The duo, indicated by the number of 'communication' staff they have, are obssessed with image and victimhood, seeking power and wealth through those means. That they have succeeded so far is an indication of the shallowness and immaturity of much of the culture. Surely one person to handle media is enough, especially in a culture that supposedly values hard work? Updating their website can be done by someone working one day a week. Research (for example investigating who to support) could probably also be done by someone working one day a week. And they probably want a personal assistant each.
----------
I went back to my tarot reading for ARO and it was quite confusing at the time. Perhaps because she is so darn messy?! I will try and see what the cards have to say today, but back then (in summary, retrospectively):

She is trying to transform her life through ARO.

There is something very impulsive about it; it is being driven by the 'irrational'.

She is hoping to find help and clarity 'on the journey'.

ARO is still at the building stage, but her greed pushes her to try and do the inpossible.

There is a sweet, nice young woman involved with the project.

What she does not realize is that to redeem herself she has to sacrifice her ego, everything she believes about herself.

Ultimately she is trying to 'tap into' her energy and creativity.

Too much force, detached from true creativity and energy is self-destructive. She also has issues with balance, staying the course with hard work through good times and bad, and 'wanders' off track and seeks solace with friends.



Happy Birthday, Prince Louis - six today!

We have been treated to an absolutely gorgeous portrait photo taken by his mother With a rider that no photoshopping was used).

What was unusual was that it was released straight to social media, not the Press.

-------
Now for something completely Off Topic, (well almost 'cos I thought of sounds emanating from Riviera Orchard Farm) - another delightful young lad, winning an international competition:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/23/boy-9-from-derbyshire-wins-gull-screeching-competition.
Enjoy!



Maneki Neko said…
The DM has a very interesting headline but the article is behind a paywall (Mail+). As it appeared at 12:04, it won't be in print until tomorrow. I'll buy a copy to see what it is about. I haven't been able to see anything about it on the internet.

TOM BOWER: The dam of silence on Meghan's 'bullying' at the Palace has finally broken. This trickle will soon become a stream

Let's hope it will be more than a stream, like the Hoover dam breaking.
abbyh said…
I read it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-13339721/TOM-BOWER-dam-silence-Meghans-bullying-Palace-finally-broken-trickle-soon-stream.html

I tend to agree with his assessment. The water is seeping under the closed door of holding onto their privacy.

Maneki Neko said…
Catherine is honoured by the King for her years of public service.

Princess of Wales becomes first member of the royal family to be appointed a Royal Companion of The Order of the Companions of Honour

The Princess of Wales has received a unique honour from the King in recognition of her years of public service after being appointed to The Order of the Companions of Honour.

Kate, 42, has been made a Royal Companion of the organisation, which was founded by King George V in 1917 to recognise outstanding achievements in the arts, sciences, medicine and public service.

The Mail understands it is the first time that a member of the royal family has been appointed in the order's century-long history.

Sources say it is a symbol of the 'great esteem' the princess is held in by her father-in-law, King Charles.

As well as being a personal thank you for her loyal service to the Crown since she married Prince William almost 13 years ago, it is also an acknowledgment of her contribution to the arts.
..................
Eat your heart out, Megsy.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13341209/Kate-Middleton-King-Charles-companions-honour.html
Sandie said…
This 'new' information about bullying is not actually new. Valentine Low revealed it in his book. What is new is that Samantha Cohen revealed that she was one of the people interviewed for the sealed bullying investigation, and that her supposed replacement quit after the southern African tour, where she was being shown the ropes. We can deduce that the situation was unbearable by then.

I think we should avoid the word 'bullying' as the conversation then is focused on what is bullying, excuses such as cultural clash, and so on.

The fact that seems to emerge is that the duo are very difficult to work with. The record proves that they have high staff turnover. The record also proves that they have achieved nothing on their own, other than: get a lot of attention, receive a lot of awards, make a lot of speeches, whine and complain, give smallish donations especially to organizations bent on controlling free speech, use existing organizations as a bandwagon to them claim credit for work ... What else? Announce big projects that are a damp squid, pap walks, eat out, buy loads of itty bitty jewellery, cadge rides on private jets, take holidays, throw hissy fits about security and privacy. What is diminishing is the glossy photo shoots and longish interviews, royal appearances in the UK, speeches on major platforms like the UN or G7, top-tier designer wear.
Sandie said…
https://www.royal.uk/appointments

New honours for William and Catherine, and the Queen and the Duchess of Gloucester.

Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Gloucester, GCVO, DStJ, CD, to be a Royal Lady Companion of the Most Noble Order of the Garter.

His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales, K.G., K.T., A.D.C., to be Great Master of the Most Honourable Order of the Bath.

Her Majesty The Queen to be Grand Master and First or Principal Dame Grand Cross of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire.

Her Royal Highness The Princess of Wales, GCVO, to be Royal Companion of The Order of the Companions of Honour.
Sandie said…
I missed this very interesting post from secondhandcoke:

https://www.reddit.com/user/SecondhandCoke/comments/
----------
Last year was when news went big that divorce was imminent. I posted it here, Lady C posted it... was everywhere. I think what happened is Their Navel-Gazing on Netflix broadcast and Spare didn't yield nearly enough money to where she could break away. ALSO she ALMOST had Getty in her britches and people say was planning some Gone Girl level heist to get Getty juice to join her eggs in a test tube somewhere, bust out the moonbump, hide the surrogate for a year--nbd she's done that before, and behold she'd have a billionaire's baby and would have been set for life regardless of whether Getty married her. Thank goodness his family intervened in time. Anyway those things and the fact that she's ruined her old MO of jumping into the pants of someone richer and dumber have her stuck to Harry whereas I think she'd otherwise have been long gone. A) she's too old to be anyone's sugar baby and B) all the wealthy men in the world know what her game is now, and they run like hell whenever there's even a rumor she's in the same room.

I've heard that in terms of business, Harry and Meghan are fully going their separate ways. As for their marriage, they have fights all the time where she prostrates herself on the floor asking Harry why he is purposefully ruining her life. He breaks down crying saying shit like "I'm not good enough for you now am I? Please don't leave me!" (Source house staff and film crews). Then she love bombs him back in, they fight, rinse and repeat ad nauseum until hopefully it will finally lack value enough for her to end it once and for all.

Meanwhile, Harry wants to go home but no one will even speak to him until the divorce is finalized and only then will they let him back in as a private family member who is never again trusted and rarely seen in public.
Sandie said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Maneki Neko said…
@Sandie

Yes, "the duo are very difficult to work with". Samantha Cohen said that working with them was "like working with teenagers". A brutal assessment but, I'm sure a very true one. She was supposed to stay for six monts but ended up staying for eighteen months, I think because the Palace couldn't find a replacement for her. Eighteen months - I admire her fortitude.
snarkyatherbest said…
Bullying is a Markle thing (despite the rumors we hear of harry). it is her, her brand, her reputation. gets harry kinda off the hook maybe enough for Charles to let him back home for a little rehab (sniff sniff) and rehab (reputation). i think that is why we are seeing this emerge yet again.
Magatha Mistie said…

Thanks @Maneki
Coming home soon X

Girl with a Hat said…
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1891747/prince-harry-invictus-games-security-uk-return

Prince Harry poised to cancel UK return for Invictus Games Service over security fears



Now he thinks he can emotionally blackmail the UK into giving him Internationally Protected Person status.

There's been some talk that the USA is actually secretly funding their security. Since Joe Biden looks poised to lose the election, the * will be stepping up their campaign to get more freebies in that area.
abbyh said…
I got the message.

Could you please reference several specific day and time so I can take a closer look?

thanks

abbyh said…
Thank you for the specific reference. It helps.

I'm not seeing it as you are.

What I am seeing is a reference to something else and then a difference of opinion from that something else.

I suspect though it is partially about the term society. Society where is not specified. It could just as easily be the UK as, when you read sites like the DM, what they print appears to be in line with what was written in the opinion. And the DM is cited here frequently. Or The Spectator or Tatler or youtube.

At no point am I reading anything which specifically targets a specific group which is a protected by USA law.

What I am seeing is an opinion, that if I were doing/being, close to it, I might feel a little hot under the collar about though. I might not like it, want to read it, feel upset by it but ...

(I am not a lawyer) I'm not seeing as such (an opinion) as illegal.

If you still feel it is racist and so on, please send me another message as to what exactly it is, which is the part which is racist and and how this specifically is exhibiting this specific hatred.


Thank you again







Bullying= causing excruciating, agonising mental pain to someone to enjoy their humiliation and helplessness when your victim is unable to defend themselves.

It was a filthy trick of the Royal Family to not accept their culpability in Harry and his wife's behaviour when their mode of operation was clear to everybody. IMMORAL is the word!

Don't play with the words, it is exactly what it is.
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1cbzdlr/doubt_that_harry_is_afraidmore_propagandawill/

Harold is still making a fuss about security. It is like trying to reason with a toddler throwing a tantrum.

He does get special treatment, tailor made for him, but the government decides what is required not the two control freaks from California.

Having armed royal protection officers has never made royals 100% safe.

Princess Anne had armed royal protection officers with her when a rogue idiot stopped the car, tried to kidnap her and shot two of her RPOs, one badly.

Queen Elizabeth was shot at while riding a horse at Trooping the Colour (turned out to be blanks), and while being surrounded by hundreds of soldiers from the armed forces.

Charles, when Prince of Wales, was shot at when giving a speech at a royal engagement (also turned out to be blanks) in Australia. I think the Prime Minister was also present so there was plenty of security.

The likelihood of anyone in the royal family being shot or kidnapped are very small, but when it does happen, having armed royal protection officers is not guaranteed to stop someone from trying to you shoot you or kidnap you.

If they are so afraid they should stay at home in a double fortified property. Do they really think the overweight security in their huge SUVs guarantee their safety in America?
Girl with a Hat said…
The head of a criminal gang in Holland threatened the life of the Crown Princess, Princess Amelia. The guy is on the run and was last seen in Spain.

You don't hear much about that, unlike the incessant whining of the whorechard owners.
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1cc9vu2/the_telegraph_how_to_solve_a_problem_like_meghans/

This is a discussion about a Telegraph article in which experts give their opinion on how TBW can fix her image and win back the people of the UK. Each expert, although they all seem to have a positive view of her overall, has their own view in what she should fix (cut the word salad, do the work quietly and only speak out when you have actually achieved something, be yourself ...).

What these experts do not seem to understand is that the problem is she did show who she really is, by her action and her words, and that is why she is so unpopular.
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1cc8gm4/tell_me_highgrove_doesnt_have_a_sense_of_humor/

The Highgrove shop is being inundated with orders. There is a rather amusing surprise in their box of chocolates: Nutty Nutmeg and Glorious Ginger are the names of two of the chocolates in the box.
----------

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1cc62hn/jar_20_another_bully_promoting_meghans_pink/

Chrissy Teigen got jam jar number 20.
Maneki Neko said…
I hope the Palace does something about the bullying allegations and soon. DM excerpts.

Buckingham Palace must release its ruling over allegations that the Duchess of Sussex bullied staff after a key witness broke her silence, a prominent Royal historian demanded tonight.

Tom Bower told 'The Reaction' the decision by Meghan's former senior adviser, Samantha Cohen, to admit she gave evidence into the investigation could burst the 'dam'.

Appearing as a guest for hosts Sarah Vine and Andrew Pierce, Mr Bower argued: 'At some stage, King Charles has got to decide, and I hope it is sooner rather than later, that the Sussexes must be exposed.'
. . .
'The key thing is until the Sussexes are 'socially destroyed' their creditability undermined; the Royal Family in Britain is going to be constantly their target,' the best selling author believes.

The author of 'Revenge: Meghan, Harry, and the War Between the Windsors' added the complainants face a problem coming forward with future employers.

'The question now is whether the other women involved decide to put their name and step up above the parapet and say they too have been interviewed and what their complaints are,' he continued.

'The problem for these women is if they come out and say that Meghan Markle treated them badly, however fair, employers of theirs will fear that they cannot be trusted over their secrets.

'They have a major problem of trust and that has always been Meghan's strongest card.'


The need for confidentiality for continued employment might trump the complainants' wishes to expose *. Tom Bower can demand all he likes but I'm not sure Charles will do anything which might widen the rift between the RF and the Montecito two. In the unlikely (I think) event that the findings be released and * was proved to be a bully, she'll play the victim and will cry racism again. I fear the RF can't win.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-13346325/Buckingham-Palace-release-ruling-Meghan-Markle-staff-bullying-allegations-royal-expert-tells-latest-episode-YouTube-talk-Reaction.html
Magatha Mistie said…

Apologies: Amos 5:24
Martin Luther King
Suwannee River

Up the Swanny

Starts with a trickle
becoming a stream
A slight fissure
kraken seam
More bullying claims
melting her floe
Flooding River Rock
Montecito
Let justice roll down like waters
engulfing them and their dream…

Hikari said…
A perceived trust issue between the Palace and the public certainly exists, but “trust” was never Harry’s wife’s strongest card. That is, and has always been, the ‘R’ card. She was deploying that a year before the engagement, wasn’t it, when she forced H to issue a bleating and pompous “Stop the attacks on my girlfriend, you race-baiting press twats!” memorandum.

“‘ hoo’s your bird we’re meant to be baiting, then, Hazza?

“Meghan Markle, international supermodel and star of the hit legal drama “Suits”, you morons.”

“Never ‘eard of ‘er.”


There’s no way in hell a fully Caucasian woman, regardless of her nationality or marital status could have gotten away with the level of Crap and baseless allegations This One’s Wife has. Thankfully most people on both sides of the Pond do not believe these allegations. That is one level of trust that has not been in doubt. Why, just the very fact that that slattern was feted with a Royal wedding, a title, a house and the honor of representing the Crown is proof the RF is not racist. If it were, they would have shown Madam’s octoroon butt the door—or more precisely she wouldn’t have passed the gates to begin with. HMTQ, being a Christian woman, wanted to be inclusive, but that generosity was expended on the lowest and most undeserving, ungrateful party imaginable.

If only someone had been able to make H see sense before it was too late. And regardless of how many times she falsely cried, “Pregnant!” I don’t believe he would’ve been forced to marry her. That idea is out of mode in the 21st century, even for Royals. She’s not the first guttersnipe playmate of a Prince and they didn’t all get to be Duchesses.

She’s a soulless parasite and there’s no reputation rehab for those. People who think that any personal growth and image rehabilitation is possible from her at this late date or deluding themselves that she’s actually a human being who gives two fluffs about anyone else. This is an endlessly cycling conversation since the shine wore off her just weeks into the marriage. “What can she, should she, do to improve her image & be a success?” The answer is always been the same: work hard, be humble, be authentic. If she could do this, she would. She can’t, but even if she were capable she wouldn’t want to. She wants everything for nothing. At this point, who really wants to see her succeed? Her version of succeeding is tearing everyone else down.

This new venture, ARO will inevitably fail… Does anybody actually believe that she has other products to launch besides 50 jars of jam that someone else made for her? When it does inevitably fail, no doubt the jamfluencers of Instagram will be called out as racists for not making Megsie the next Lifestyle Kween to unseat both Martha & Gwyneth. From Duchess of the United Kingdom to strawberry jam peddler…Pathetic.

Incidentally, Jesus Enrique Rosas has got Sus manos on a jar of the bespoke puréed crap. He says it’s not fake; he’s got his stem over the number which will reveal which lucky recipient lent him their jar for a photo. I don’t think Jesus was on the recipient list of influencers that Harry’s wife wants to suck up to, but if he did get his own jar he better not eat it because it’s probably poisoned. Imagine what collectors items those 50 homely jars will be when all the truth comes crashing down about Mega-Fraud.
Girl with a Hat said…
Lady Colin Campbell demands Archie and Lilibet are removed from line of succession unless Palace can provide “absolute proof that Meghan bore those children”.
The royal author blows up the conspiracy of silence surrounding births of the Sussex children:

https://twitter.com/danwootton/status/1783124291925508532
KnitWit said…
I wonder what the proposed retail price for royal jam. It seems like such an odd first product. There are plenty of varieties stocked in every store. It is also in the urban dictionary.

I wonder if they will stock the cousins weed. Didn't he name a strain after the couple?

I preferred the photos of the birthday boy. I hope Catherine and the kings treatments are progressing. I also hope she doesn't lose her beautiful long hair. Anyone undergoing cancer treatment has other concerns, but it would still be traumatic.

I have been scheduling the recommended tests and screenings. Best not to put such things off.

Has anyone received their jam yet? Ha. I prefer fresh strawberries au naturel.
Hikari said…
And finally Lady C howls ( in her inimitable tones) to Release the Kraken!

Something tells me that Lady C is not going to be getting a numbered jar from Monteshitshow either. But neither will she be on any Royal Garden party or Honors Lists, I’m afraid. The Palace doesn’t respond to ultimatums from tabloid writers— The only exception being the one the Queen made in addressing the people after Diana died. Charles will be angered because he won’t like to feel pressurized before he’s ready. I think he proposed honestly to leave the whole mess for William to sort out. And presently, with the King and the Princess of Wales seriously ill, the RF is particularly vulnerable. This is a lousy time for this to be coming to a head now— But really, when was it ever going to be a good time? The Royals had to have known that this festering issue was going to blow up in their faces sooner or later and they couldn’t just pretend in perpetuity that there was nothing at all untoward about Harry’s wife’s procreation of heirs to the Crown. They might have been able to keep the pretense up and manage it had the couple stayed in harness in the Firm and not courted further controversy. But now that Hawwy has declared that he is done with the UK and his one and only home is California… It’s time to call their bluff on the Archie & Lili charade. After all what do four residents of Montecito California have to do with the crown of the United Kingdom? Squat, that’s what.

Perhaps Charles will use his illness to avoid having to address the subject head on and save face by letting the message slip out via other channels. Can it be done in such a way that there are no palace fingerprints on it anywhere? Perhaps everyone is agreed that the only way to reveal the truth without the royal family catching heat for having knowledge is to wait for King William to revise the LOS and remove his brother’s children. He can honestly say at that juncture that everyone within the family was sworn to secrecy by the late Queen Elizabeth and King Charles of blessed memory, and that he, as their liege man, honored their wishes despite great personal turmoil. The world would empathize because we can tell how very much he is bursting to say and can’t. And now that it is in his power to do, he’s throwing the windows open and restoring the LOS to its true form. I think king William might also persuade his Toerag brother to renounce his own place in the LOS, along with any royal titles which are unbefitting a full-time resident of a non-Commonwealth country.Xxxx
Maneki Neko said…
@Hikari

* wasn't the only royal girlfriend 'attacked' by the press. Diana was chased by paps once it was announced she was Charles' girlfriend and similarly, Catherine was hounded every time she left her flat. 'Media reports say she has been given a police radio for her protection.' (Reuters). Yet we never heard either of them complain publicly.

As for her image, I'm afraid *'s is irredeemable. She has shown her true colours right from the start and we have seen how ugly her soul is. No amount of PR, however skilful it might be, could change that jumped up tart's image.
Maneki Neko said…
@Girl with a Hat

Interesting. I opened the link but the site doesn't say much. I'm not on X so perhaps that's why but when I googled 'Lady Colin Campbell demands' etc, all I get is this on X:

Kristen Meinzer

Lady Colin Campbell, who "earned" her title by being married to a man for 9 months, thinks Archie & Lilibet are less legitimate than she is. What makes her an expert in legitimacy? And why is she not leveling the same scrutiny & suspicion at George, Charlotte & Louis?

Absolutely outrageous. I think I K Meinzer must be a sugar. She's 'an award-winning podcaster, culture critic, royal watcher, and author.' Her tone is very sarcastic, viz. 'On the latest episode of the Daily Fail podcast, @maurafcurrie & I discuss Meghan Markle's decision to commit the ultimate atrocity: making jam.' No need for such ridiculous hyperbolic language.

If she's wondering why Lady C is not levelling the same scrutiny at William and Catherine's children, then she must be deliberately obtuse.

The tweet was retweeted by Dan Wootton but his tweet must have been taken down. I looked up dabwootonoutspoken.com/p/lady-c-sussex children but I keep getting the message 'This site can't be reached'. I managed, however, to find the actual video. It is a long one (1 hour) and I speeded up the playback as Lady C's delivery is very slow. She said the Palace staff were incompetent and inactive. I've only watched the first several minutes and will report on the rest if it is of any interest.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5Hg7bg5XIis



Could the `security threat' that H fears so much if he comes to the UK be a whack from the Prince of Wales? Cheered on by the vast majority of the population?

Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1cceqbp/kris_jenner_posted_a_pic_of_scam_jam_whatever/

Kris Jenner got jam jar 13.

Who is going to reveal the message in the envelope?
----------

I had an idea of what the King can do to resolve the problem of the line of succession.

First, to me, Lady C is just stoking the flames of outrage and speculation, and thus feeding into their victimhood. But, there is a real problem that the royal family is not resolving.

* To be in the line of succession, the Palace must be provided with a document signed by everyone in the birth team. It is thus not an automatic birthright but must be verified by the Palace and a record must be kept.
* The Palace, i.e. the King, announces the birth of anyone in the first 6 in the line of succession. (First 10? Another number? Just for children born to the direct heir?)
SwampWoman said…
KnitWit said: have been scheduling the recommended tests and screenings. Best not to put such things off.


Yeah, me too. I went ahead and had the hated mammogram last week after repeatedly "forgetting" to schedule it last year.

Today I'm off for a nuclear stress test. Bleh.

Girl with a Hat said…
https://twitter.com/i/trending/1783385985377845532

Harry's Visa Scandal: Fight for Transparency
Last updated
4 hours ago
The Biden administration has rejected a request to release Prince Harry's US visa documents, citing an 'extraordinary' comment from the US ambassador that Joe Biden will never deport the royal. This decision has sparked controversy and discussions on social media, with some calling for equal treatment under the law and questioning the special treatment of Prince Harry. Nile Gardiner and the Heritage Foundation are leading the fight to expose the truth about the Department of Homeland Security's handling of the situation, emphasizing the public's right to know.
This story is a summary of posts on X and may evolve over time. Grok can make mistakes, verify its outputs.
Sandie said…
https://youtu.be/r608WpujDi4?si=3R2s-fdrYkqwY39u

I finally managed to get a link to the video! Matt Wilkinson from The Sun interviews royal reporter Richard Palmer. The part about the duo starts from about the middle of the video.

* Hapless genuinely got on very well with royal reporters and photographers before he got married. Then he completely changed.
* The duo would have 'interrogation' sessions with staff after every engagement, analysing a d questioning every single detail. The need to control is pathological (my opinion).
* We know that the late Queen put together a team to work out half in/half out options for the duo. She made the decision just before the Sandringham summit that those options were all off the table. So, hapless walked into that meeting thinking he could pick which option they wanted and instead was told you are either in or out, and you lose your security. One cannot help but speculate that the late Queen found out something or realized something that informed that decision, which did take hapless by surprise. In retrospect, we know it was the right decision.
Sandie said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Hikari said…
@Maneki

I remember Diana being swarmed by paps as she tried to get in her little car, and I was so impressed by her poise. This was a teenage girl who was not accustomed to celebrity. They had to move her into the Palace early because the attention was so insane.

That is the kind of mania Mrs. Dumbarton craves around herself and that’s what she was attempting to whip up with that press statement she made Hawwy release. If she actually received any press harassment, it might’ve been warranted, but at the time it came out they only been dating a few months and H Hadn’t even told the palace that he was dating anybody. That was the first sign of trouble, because he put that out without permission and the palace was already on the back foot that early. * was impatient that she wasn’t getting mobbed by paps because no one knew she was taking booth calls from Prince HazNone. So she had to goose it along. And everyone reading it went, “Who????” As per her MO, * launched her PR half assed and way too early.

Let’s not forget the media harassment Camilla received. She actually had projectiles thrown at her and maybe they weren’t all is benign as bread rolls. Narkle will take notereity rather than be ignored. That’s why her image will never improve. She actually revels in attacking people and ruining lives. It’s what she lives for. In our day and age, the notion of demonic possession seems quaint. What ancient peoples attributed to demons, we justify away with psychiatric diagnoses and “personality” and “differing childhood experiences”. Maybe we are right…or maybe evil is real and walks among us. I’m convinced that there is something more than childhood insecurities driving this person. Wonder if one can actually catch a whiff of sulphur underneath the haze of cannabis.

.
I took a shufti at KM's website, https://www.kristenmeinzer.com/

According to the brief description where the search results came up*,
she's a `writer and commentator who explores pop culture through an intersectional feminist lens'. From my conservative, nay reactionary, viewpoint that tells us everything.

*https://uk.search.yahoo.com/search?fr=mcafee&type=E210GB1274G0&p=Kristen+Meinzer

There's a list of her royal articles, real toe-curling ones, at
https://www.kristenmeinzer.com/royal-watcher. All concerned with superficialities and no idea how it all works.
Excellent suggestion as to what H is afraid of here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1ccp3ma/what_harry_is_really_terrified_of_happening_when/
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1ccpnxa/day_50_of_the_great_jam_reveal/

There's a very strange Jam photo here, insofar as it's assumed to have originated with* and to be AI.

It's labelled Day 50 and is a perfect example of how still-life painting began as a Memento Mori, a reminder of mortality and how everything decays. The lemons are mouldy, the leaves are brown and all it needs is a skull. It is almost too beautiful an image of the fragility of life, apart from the under-filled yet unopened pot of jam which is still in good order.

Is she telling us that her product is full of preservatives?

I wonder if the true problem of Harry and his wife with the Royal Family is that the King does not accept the idea primus inter pares and that he and the whole family consider themselves being creatures of a much higher order than their subjects. Andrew and Harry have both made quite clear that they think that they have rights that ordinary peasants don't have. That they are more important persons than all the normal Brits.

Maybe the King does not want to do anything to the couple because the shit they constantly spread out over the Royal Family has small gold nuggets in it and therefore doesn't stink as badly as normal excrement.

But the truth is for a born prince Harry is full of shit and he reeks of it.

Does the King fully accept that a member of the family is constantly burning taxpayers money as a hobby because he has nothing better to do while he is not working for a living?
Maneki Neko said…

@Wild Boar


Is she telling us that her product is full of preservatives?

Good question. Does she know herself? We don't know for sure that she made it herself,
Sandie said…
https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/27516648/meghan-and-harry-rip-apart-royal-staff/

The article sums up what Richard Palmer said in the interview.
If you can face it, have a dekko at this freak show. Some of the comments are priceless:

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1ccturx/meghans_fans_have_no_pictures_of_archie_and_lili/
Maneki Neko said…

@Wild Boar

Freak show indeed! And the sugars were attacking Catherine for her very slightly photoshopped photo!

I was thinking that 'Archie''s head in picture 4 looked like a shrunken, beardless Harry and then I read this comment:

'Number 4!!!😱
Put adult h’s face on a four year old boy’s body.'

Ridiculous.

Maneki Neko said…
Kris Jenner is now the lucky recipient of a jar of strawberry jam.

One of the comments in the DM said 'I read that the 50 ‘friends’ have been given their orders as to the date they go public with their pot. That way it keeps her in the media for far longer than most of us would like - cheap publicity.' Quite likely, so we'll have fifty days, perhaps forty-five now, of celebrities and their jar of strawberry jam. Yawn.
Hikari said…
The day set for the unveiling of Toe-Jam #50 is 4 June…aka the wedding day of the Duke of Westminster—the Grifters were resoundingly not invited. The Duke was school chums with both Wills and H but the aristo set has no further contact w H since he hooked up with TW. Perhaps Catherine will be feeling well enough to attend, as she and William are invited.

Mugs is losing her touch…she timed the births (and announcements of their impending arrival)of two ersatz kids to interfere with significant events in the life of thr RF, but she thinks an Instagram photo of her ripped off jam and tatty lemons is going to overshadow the society wedding of the year? Rofl.
Magatha Mistie said…

*Megicide

As he stood by the side
of his sly’n’snide bride
Losing his stride
along with his pride
Strong whiff of bitter lemons
sparkling cyanide
End of old hazz
Funguycide…

*menticide -brainwash/destroy


Sandie said…
https://archive.ph/2024.04.26-013430/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13351983/Prince-Harry-medals-video-Montecito-soldier-award.html

Anyone well-informed enough to explain this to me? What is this soldier of the year award? Why is it being presented via video? And why is he standing outside what looks like a back door to present it to her? The DM has this to say, but I am not seeing any ceremony, nor any sign of hosts:

"The award ceremony was hosted by the Military Times - an independent news website who honour one outstanding military member for each branch of service, based on service that goes beyond the call of duty."

Could they not do better for Ellie? Apologies for making comparisons, but William would have either visited her at her home or invited her to his to present the award. Or could this not have waited for the IG celebrations in London next month?
Magatha Mistie said…

Singalong 🎤
Apologies: Julie Andrews
The Sound of Music


The Grind of Muzac

Tear drops on poses
unworn leather mittens
Wanting last word on
anything that’s written
Brown paper bags
accused of racism
These are a few of her
unsavoury schisms

When the dog fights
Using jam bites
We know she’s mad
Always remember
her fear of a slight
That makes me feel
so glad…



Magatha Mistie said…

Yeast lead Soonest Ended

Wallis appeared to have
polish, glamour
Same can’t be said of
Hazzas par heure
Bottling vittles in a jar
not quite, right
Surely they’ve realised
They’re like vegemite…


Girl with a Hat said…
https://www.tmz.com/2024/04/25/king-charles-funeral-plans-discussed-cancer-battle-not-going-well/

King Charles' cancer battle not going well. Funeral plans are being updated.
snarkyatherbest said…
Hikari. but what if her plan is to post it on her united states provence forest insta with a basket and fancy scroll to the Duke of Westminster. So sorry we couldn’t attend on your happy day. H and I split. happy marriage as long as it lasts.

Hikari said…
@Snarky

The hussy is brazen and insane enough to do that but she’d only highlight her non-invitation, and she wouldn’t want that. It wouldn’t make any difference. I do believe that 4 June is Invisibet’s birthday isn’t it? Isn’t it nifty how megs invisible children’s birthdays always seem to interfere with significant activities in the calendar of the royal family?

Even if she posted her children’s legitimate but certificates online, it still won’t overshadow this wedding to the parties that matter. Rachel is swirling the drain, the toilet drain and nothing is going to change that by this point.
OKay said…
If Madame is planning to roll out one jar of jam daily x50 days, she really has lost the plot. Nobody cares now; by three, four weeks in people will be apoplectic just trying to make it stop.

@GWAH I'm sure for Royals, funeral plans are updated regularly. And of course, we have no idea how precisely KC is doing at the moment. However, TMZ is a rag and not to be taken at all seriously.
This comment has been removed by the author.
So, `https://www.tmz.com/2024/04/25/king-charles-funeral-plans-discussed-cancer-battle-not-going-well/

' Is that a fact, as they say with scorn?

Compare it with this:
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/live/king-charles-news-live-cancer-health-update-statement-170121025.html

Yahoo News UK
King Charles news live: Monarch to resume royal duties amid cancer treatment
King Charles will return to public royal duties alongside Queen Camilla next week, Buckingham Palace says, as the monarch continues to be treated for cancer
Harriet Sinclair·Deputy News Editor
Updated Fri, 26 April 2024 at 6:15 pm BST

King Charles is set to return to public duty next week, following the announcement of his cancer diagnosis in February.

In a statement, Buckingham Palace said: "His Majesty The King will shortly return to public-facing duties after a period of treatment and recuperation following his recent cancer diagnosis.

"To help mark this milestone, The King and Queen will make a joint visit to a cancer treatment centre next Tuesday, where they will meet medical specialists and patients.

"This visit will be the first in a number of external engagements His Majesty will undertake in the weeks ahead."

The palace announced the King's diagnosis, and subsequent break from royal duties, at the beginning of February - although there has been no word as to which kind of cancer Charles has been diagnosed with.

Charles has been receiving care as an outpatient since early February and the announcement will be a boost for the monarchy as it comes to terms with King and the Princess of Wales as cancer patients.

Sources stressed that despite the welcome news the King still has cancer and will continue to treated for the undisclosed form of the disease.

A picture marking the first anniversary of the crowning of the King and Queen on May 6 has been released, taken the day after their 19th wedding anniversary on April 10.


NB This is from The Press Association - I know who I believe.

(I'll correct things if I've double posted)
The report that GWAH posted appeared in Cosmopolitan - need I say more?
Maneki Neko said…
... it was announced on Friday 26 April that King Charles III will return to public-facing duties after a period of treatment following his recent cancer diagnosis.

The monarch is said to be “greatly encouraged” at returning to royal engagements.

Charles has been receiving care as an outpatient since early February, and the announcement will be a boost for the monarchy coming to terms with King and the Princess of Wales as cancer patients.

A Buckingham Palace spokesperson said: “His Majesty is greatly encouraged to be resuming some public-facing duties and very grateful to his medical team for their continued care and expertise.”


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/king-charles-announcement-today-palace-livefeed-b2535570.html


The BBC has the same message and shows a lovely photo of Charles and Camilla taken on 10 th April. They're both very smiley and Charles looks very healthy.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68906421
Thank you, Maneki Neko, for bringing news of the BBC photo -it's very cheering on a miserable, perishin' cold, night of pouring rain.

BTW I don't think I've ever seen anyone commenting that *'s habit of `falling to the floor weeping` is just like a two=year old throwing a tantrum on he supermarket floor because mummy won't give in to him or her, although I suspect that the `weeping' is really wailing and gnashing of teeth.

If anyone has eminently gnashable teeth, it's surely her.
abbyh said…
SwampWoman,

May I take out a little bit of personal information?
Interesting video from PDina about the Queen allegedly putting her foot down over Beatrice * Eug:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RzToj4wuMs

What do you think?
Hikari said…
KCIII is remarkably sturdy and resilient. This is a man who sailed through Covid—twice—in his 70s, and the first time was the scary 2020 first wave. Charles & the PM were among the very first high-profile patients..I think they both got it at the Commonwealth Day service that year. I was legitimately afraid for BoJo, who’d been taken to hospital via ambulance. I was concerned for Charles but not as worried because even though BoJo is 20 years younger, He looks like he’s got all the stamina of an unmade bed, and I’m confident that Charles could kick his ass even now under cancer treatment. As Prince of Wales, Charles was renowned for keeping a punishing schedule that left much younger aides dragging, and according to his wife, is a legendary rambler, for whom 8 or 10 miles constitutes a wee walk before tea. Charles was mocked as soft as a child but somewhere a switch flipped and he morphed into a dynamo of indefatigable energy. Charles gathers no moss and sitting around on light duties must have him chomping at the bit with boredom. Not totally sure how Charles earned this enduring reputation as a socially awkward introvert, because to me he seems quite the Bon vivant even at less than full strength. His outer appearance belies the force of nature I think he is when he is engaged in his work, and he loves being the King. At least, he loves being out in the public. Such an energetic character might find the administrative demands of the monarch tedious.

I feel positive about his recovery because of his mindset, and I feel the same about Catherine. The King’s only taken 8 weeks off, give or take. He’s taking holidays that lasted as long. His doctors might wish him to make a slower entry back into public life but I think he’s reached a point where he’s done playing the sickie. Like his mother, he lives to work. Wishing him a full recovery and hoping he doesn’t overdo it too soon.
Sandie said…
I have not yet done the tarot reading on the wife and ARO, but came across this one, which seems accurate:

Dynamic Reading: Meghan & Harry (April 2024)

Dynamic - 5 of Spades (failure/pride before downfall/abuse/surrender), Queen of Clubs (courageous/independent/confident)

Something failed. It's not their relationship. Surprisingly, I think their relationship has gotten better. Unlike last time when I kept seeing a separation between the two.
This failure I'm seeing feels like a project that Meghan was working on. I think it's the American Orchard thing. The Queen of Clubs tells me that Meghan has a lot of confidence in this project. It can also possibly indicate someone else. Likely an investor or someone that can play a major role in Meghan's new business.

Meghan - 4 of Spades (fear/worries/solitude/withdrawal)

I see Meghan worrying and withdrawing herself from everyone.
It's hitting Meghan quite hard because she had a ton of hope in this thing. I'm not saying that her whole endeavour has failed. I'm only seeing an aspect of it getting terribly affected.

Harry - 6 of Diamonds (support/charity/funds)

I'm actually seeing Harry worry about Meghan's emotional well-being. He's supporting her as much as he can. However, I'm also seeing Harry helping Meghan's business.
This card is a money card which makes me think that there are some issues with investors or just funds in general. I see Harry reaching out to anyone who can invest in this business. He might be pulling out money from his own pocket too.

Overall, it seems like there are some money issues for a specific endeavour that Meghan is working on and Harry is helping as much as he can.

https://www.tumblr.com/is-mayo-an-instrument/748785119358238720/dynamic-reading-meghan-harry-april-2024?source=share
Sandie said…
Richard Eden posted on X that she failed to find a CEO and is now trying to get Netflix involved (i.e. to run the business for her). I find that very strange, but they are friends with the top guy at Netflix so maybe she can pull a rabbit out of the hat and persuade him?
----------
@WBBM
I find that story about Queen Camilla 'freezing out' Beatrice and Eugenie a bit suspect. Both princesses are busy (career, husband, children, family, busy social life), and the King has been having cancer treatment (plus, he is usually so busy and moves between residences).

Camilla is a seasoned royal now, so although I suspect she loves a good gossip, I am sure she is discreet about what she says to whom. She is quite used to socializing with a lot of people with whom she has to be careful what she says.

I wonder if the source of this information is not someone trying to create bitter divisions?

----------
I came across an article, in the DM I think, of some business expert waxing lyrical about how ARO is going to be so successful and make her many millions. The level of gushing was absurd and totally out of touch with reality. I did not post a link as I thought the whole thing was recycling the same old rubbish, but I should have, for a laugh!
Sandie said…
Some reality TV housewife (?) received a jar of jam. No message posted - just the photo. She met the woman at that event where she had to be 'persuaded' to get off the red carpet because she was keeping the celebrities waiting.

I did a quick scan of who has the most followers on IG and tried to cross-check with whom she has sent her offerings. Chrissy Teigen has a massive following, but the rest seem to be nowhere near the top 20, so far. What was the criteria? That she had to have met them once? Good character does not seem to have been a criteria. I look forward to having the complete list and wasting a day of my life trying to find a strategy or common thread!
@Sandie

Yes, probably speculation but I think Camilla is another Royal lady with a backbone of steel - much as I'd like to believe it, how would PDina know?
https://uk.yahoo.com/style/kate-middleton-asked-spell-name-095124348.html

Does anyone really believe this? I can imagine it being said jokingly but seriously?
SwampWoman said…
Off topic, @Wild Boar Battle-maid:

My BFF is in Scotland with her husband on a sightseeing trip! I told her to take some fantastic pictures so I could tour vicariously with her.
Sandie said…
The DM seems to be publishing articles simply to get them attention and stir controversy:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13356583/Prince-Harry-faces-backlash-embarrassing-ridiculous-decision-wear-UK-participation-medals-present-army-award.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13345275/Who-receive-Meghans-5-jams-Duchesss-list-pals-numbered-pots-American-Riviera-Orchard-preserve-reveal-running-exclusive-samples-spreading-Marmite-toast.html
Maneki Neko said…
@SwampWoman OT

I know your post was addressed to while Board but I hope your friends enjoy Scotland. It is really beautiful. The weather at the moment, however, is not great, colder than usual and a bit wet generally. I hope you'll be able to visit it one day if you haven't already. In the meantime, enjoy the photos.
Off topic @SwampWoman

I do hope the weather is kind to your friend/she has taken adequate clothing for the cold and the wet - but one doesn't go to Scotland for the sun! May can be really beautiful but probably not this year. is she a Floridian? She'll notice a significant difference in day-length - more light in the evening.
If she does try humility, she'll brag about it but Uriah Heap got there first.

'We are so very 'umble.'

"I am well aware that I am the umblest person going,"
Maneki Neko said…
@Wild Boar

Apologies for mangling your name in my post to @SwampWoman. I should have proofread.
SwampWoman said…
@Maneki Neko, @Wild Boar Battle-maid: Friend lives in a very cold part of the US. She can't stand the heat, I can't stand the cold, so she is planning to visit us next year. I told her that January and February are our coldest months, so she may be able to tolerate it then.

I asked her if she was packing for winter, spring, rainy and sunny weather? I also asked if she would eat a haggis for me (grin).

/Scotland may be slightly warmer than where she resides.
Maneki Neko said…
@SwampWoman OT

I don't think your friend will be bothered by the heat in Scotland at the moment!
Packing for winter, spring, rainy and sunny weather should cover all eventualities.
We love haggis but I suppose it's like Marmite, you either love it or hate it.
* never went to Scotland, certainly not Balmoral (not her scene) and yet it's so beautiful. She never even had the curiosity to see what it was like. Her loss.
Maneki Neko said…
Probably a friendship that never as strong as * implied. Note the reference to children in the fourth paragraph, playing 'in the swimming pool on pizza-shaped floats'. I wonder if there is more she could tell about the children. If * finds out that the conversation then turned over to Catherine, she'll be raging. She won't be getting her jar of strawberry jam.
The excerpts are from the DM but the headline in in Reddit.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1cens9t/sophie_trudeau_gives_meghan_the_cold_shoulder/


'Sophie Trudeau has given the cold shoulder to Meghan Markle after saying she hasn't 'spent much time' with the Duchess who previously gushed the former First Lady of Canada was a 'dear friend'.

Ms Trudeau, who was formerly married to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, has played down her friendship with The Duchess, who previously implied she shared a close bond with Sophie and admired her as being 'emblematic of strength'.

During an episode of the Archetypes podcast in November 2022 Meghan admitted Sophie 'used to send me little meditations during my pregnancy' and voice notes 'of encouragement', adding: 'I've gone to her over the years for advice.'

Meghan also described a day of laughter and fun that the pair spent at her Montecito mansion, where their children played in the swimming pool on pizza-shaped floats while they drank wine 'on the terrace' and were 'giddy like absolute schoolgirls.'

But, when asked about her relationship with Meghan in an interview with The Times today, Ms Trudeau was reserved to say the least, saying: 'I know her... but we haven't spent much time together.'

Sophie then turned the conversation over to Meghan's sister-in-law Kate Middleton, revealing that her 'heart just sunk' when she heard about the Princess's cancer diagnosis last month.'
Girl with a Hat said…
from a comment over at CDAN:
About the birth certificates. Neil Sean said a week or so ago that the RF have repeatedly requested Lily birth certificate and received absolutely nothing but a request from sussex to update their own photos on RF site.
No birth certificate for lili .
RF know now and no one is blaming them we blame the pair for their deceit


https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2024/04/blind-item-8_27.html#disqus_thread
So there is a wiff of bullying with the lemon basins that this-one's-wife forces on people?

Harry truly is the best of fathers. He is quite ready to let the world consider that his children are royal bastards and he does not think that is disgusting parenting. But that his father did not go cyckling with him (which the King did!) was crime against humanity!

The man has no moral backbone and I hope he is going to live a very long time and will be reading the memories of BOTH his son AND his daughter about the shitty business he did against them during their childhood.
Maneki Neko said…
I have come across a term I'd never heard of - this seems to be a recent phrase - 'main character syndrome', where you see yourself as the main character in the story of your life.

'Some signs you may be experiencing main character syndrome include:

• A lack of empathy for others around you, even your friends and family (they are seen only as supporting players in your own life)

•Entitlement and an over-inflated sense of self-importance

•Difficulty seeing yourself as anything but the main character in life

•Excessive fantasizing about your real, imagined, or embellished heroic exploits

•An excessive and continual need for external validation to believe you are living up to expectations
...
People experiencing main character syndrome tend to find it challenging to maintain genuine relationships due to an inability to see others as significant.'

Reminds you of someone? Main character syndrome is closely associated with narcissistic personality disorder but the difference is the level of stability. I don't know if it applies to * but now she's not in films maybe she fancies herself as being the star in a film when she's with H presenting an award/making a speech etc. This might explain her constant need to be right, front and centre of every event, grabbing a microphone, making sure she's facing the cameras and inserting herself in the news.

https://www.betterhelp.com/advice/behavior/fantasy-vs-reality-what-is-main-character-syndrome/
https://health.clevelandclinic.org/what-to-know-about-main-character-syndrome
H's pointed finger during the backdoor investiture has echoes of Kitchener:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Kitchener_Wants_You

What shall we read into it?

@Maneki Neko: No problem, predictive text can be an absolute pain. I tried entering my real details into a friend's phone address book but had to give up as it kept calling me a variety of words that start with the same 3 or 4 letters.
Sandie said…
Apologies if this seems like an apologist post ... possible reasons why he did not wear his coronation medal for that silly video he made about awarding an honour to an IG veteran:

Of the 4 medals he did wear, one was for serving in Afghanistan and the other three were jubilee medals from the late Queen. The monarch is the head of the military, so he served for 'Queen and country'. When King Charles was crowned, he was (and had been for years) living in America, not a working royal, and not serving in the military.

The problem with this thesis is that he was not serving in the military when the first and last of the three jubilee medals were awarded, and he was classified as a veteran when the coronation medal was awarded, but I can see their messy thinking at work in ignoring inconsistencies.

Why would he snub King Charles but not Queen Elizabeth? She was monarch when they were denied the half in/half out plan they had concocted and tried to foist on the monarchy, and when their security and Frogmore were taken from them, and I doubt that he inherited anything from the late Queen.

Is this another example of their twisted and irrational thinking? They are all about image and wealth and power, so how could projecting their resentment and blame onto Charles possibly benefit them? Hapless is much more likely to inherit something from his father, and it is his father that now has the power, so how do the duo think that the choice of medals to wear or not to wear would put them in good standing with the King? They obviously did not even think that there is someone at the Palace that they could consult about protocol!

Or are they seething with resentment at some imagined slight and this is just petty revenge? I think they are more calculating than that but their thinking is so warped and immature that they often get it wrong.

So, my thinking is that he did not wear the Coronation medal because they decided that would be correct protocol.
Sandie said…
Another post that may seem apologist ... regarding Archie, Lilli, surrogacy and questioning their existence:

Led now by Lady C, I think the clamour about this issue is inappropriate and would no doubt be upsetting and hurtful for the duo (who do read and watch everything written and said about them).

My issue with them and their children is not about surrogacy nor hiding the children from the public, although I have tried to keep an open mind on both issues.

Surrogacy: I think it is likely that she was pregnant and did give birth and all the anomalies can be explained by their tendency to never tell the truth and their inability to think clearly, reasonably and intelligently. Surrogacy involves a number of people that all would have to sign on to lying and deception on a grand scale. I think the duo rather would have chosen to be open about surrogacy and sue the Crown and government to have their children included in the line of succession.

I have suggested elsewhere that the monarch should announce births from Buckingham Palace for the first 6 or so in the line of succession or perhaps for all grandchildren. And the monarch should require some kind of document signed by all present at the birth to be kept in the records. The monarch should also 'dictate' how birth certificates are worded and keep a copy of them in the archives. The present system is a bit messy with couples allowed to do their own thing but also choosing to be formally part of the monarchy and the constitutional implications of that.

There are lots of images of the children, shown in their mockumentary and in the weird Christmas cards they used to release. They do exist, they live at mudslide manor, and there is no reason for them to have any kind of public presence, except for one sticky problem ... they are in the line of succession, and quite high up in the pecking order. To me, the problem is not that their children are 'hidden' but that they are in the line of succession. These children are not British in any way other than an accident of birth and have only their inadequate parents to tell them anything about monarchy or Britain. It is bizarre that they should be in the line of succession when there are grandchildren and great grandchildren of the late Queen who are born in the UK, live in the UK, know the royal family, and are growing up knowing what it means to be royal, in private and in public.

I am sure there are people working in the Palace who are very knowledgeable about history and tradition who could sort out this sticky problem and come up with a solution that is 'modern' yet in touch with tradition, and durable. The whole point of monarchy is that you are stuck with whoever you get (good or bad) but the upbringing of potential monarchs is a way to tip the scales on the side of good (and grit your teeth and manage and endure any bad ones). But, they are British monarchs, not American, and wanting all the privilege and refusing to participate in tradition, or teach children values and responsibilities required of a monarch, is unacceptable. There are plenty of examples of royal children been brought up in a way that is appropriate ... all the cousins of hapless and their children.
janeygirl said…
There is nothing wrong with being the main character in your own life. You should be the main character in your own life. Main character syndrome is when you think you re the main character in everyone else's life and in every situation. Which certainly describes * to a tee. This is a woman who truly thinks she's the cats meow instead of something out of the litter box.
Maneki Neko said…
@alianor d'Aquitaine

Technically, H's children are not royal bastards as they were not born out of wedlock but his children might well resent him (and *) for keeping them away from their English relatives. I wonder if * will brainwash them and cry that the BRF are racists etc and that's why they had to leave the UK. I wouldn't put it past her.

I think the whiff of bullying is more to do with the jam itself rather than the bowl of lemons. I read that the lucky recipients had to post a comment and a photo. Some refused.

@Sandie

'Surrogacy involves a number of people that all would have to sign on to lying and deception on a grand scale.'

It does but that's when it's done above board. If there was/were a surrogate/s involved, I wonder if she was handsomely paid expenses but kept in the dark as to the future parents, say a 'professional couple' who couldn't have children and wanted to preserve they anonymity. I don't think that's impossible.
Maneki Neko
Bastards or not/

The law will have to work this one out

I would argue they started as royal bastards, like Charles II offspring. If, as many of us suspect, they were carried by and born of a woman not married to H, they were born bastards, just as if surely as if he's put a mistress or other playmate in the club.

Goodness knows what the implications are for them of subsequent adoption or their recognition under US law, when, frankly, we're only assuming that H is their dad and we don't know who provided the ova or bore them. We're reasonably certain that * did not give birth to them and that someone other than H's (l)awful wedded wife is their birth mother.
Sandie said…
@Maneki Neko
Main character syndrome certainly fits her!

I suppose you are describing surrogacy that is kept secret, and in yhe UK does not follow the laws. So a surrogate would have been pregnant and given birth as if it was her child and then handed over the newborn to the parents after leaving the hospital for Archie and at the hospital for Lilli. No verification is required from the hospital or any medical personnel when registering the birth in the UK. But, in the UK, national health does keep track of the newborn so some kind of story would have to have been concocted to explain why Archie 'disappeared' after birth. For Lilli, it would have been much easier as the rules are different and the practice of using surrogates who remain anonymous is well established.

The red flags for Archie is that no-one saw them go to the hospital, enter or leave the hospital, or return home, and no one at the hospital has verified that Archie was born there or that they were part of the birth team. Other royals have managed to escape notice as well so it is not unprecedented, but other than Mike talking about their third child being born on the bathroom floor, other royals do not tell stories about the birth. The duo have told fantastical stories that seem to change and just do not make sense.

@janeygirl
Wise words! We are all main characters in our lives. I think this term is actually trying to describe narcissism, a personality disorder which has as its foundation an inability to feel true empathy for others and a delusional sense of self. The main character in a story can be flawed and be very aware of the flaws. She does not have this awareness.
Maneki Neko said…
@janeygirl

I'm not sure there is nothing wrong with being the main character in your own life when you take into account the signs I listed, lack of empathy for others around you, sense of entitlement etc which certainly apply to *. The problem is when you think you're the star of the show in other people's lives, like * .
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1cf5etv/yay_thank_goodness_meghan_is_not_coming/

Latest news: he will be at the Thanksgiving Service and Damisn Lewis is going to do a reading at the ceremony.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13358989/Prince-Harry-return-Britain-days-Invictus-Games-anniversary-Meghan-stay-Montecito.html
The whole business about Royal birth being reliably witnessed is a matter of Law, it's not just tradition.

For those new to the story:
It was designed to prevent a recurrence of the events of 1688 when Prince James Francis Edward was born to catholic Mary of Modena, the second wife of James II. The dominant Protestant faction of the English population were hoping desperately that Princess Mary, James's Protestant daughter from his first marriage, would remain Heir Presumptive and we would never have another catholic king. Were a son born, he'd be Heir Apparent, destined for the throne.

Accordingly, rumour went around that the baby had been replaced by a male usurper, smuggled in in a warming pan. Hence uproar - James fled, intending to return with an army, which he did, resulting in his defeat at the Battle of the Boyne in Ireland (versus William III, who was backed, ironically, by the Pope.

When I first heard this story at school , I scoffed at the gullibility of the mob...

The application of the law become more relaxed in the 20thC: the requirement to have important witnesses actually in the delivery room was replaced by having the Home Secretary in a nearby room for the birth of Elizabeth (3rd in line) in 1926. Subsequently, the supervising doctors were judged to have the appropriate standing to be witnesses.

If anyone had predicted that some chancer might try to pull the `warming pan switch' in the 21stC, they'd have been laughed out of court. As it is, I think I have to eat my words from my schooldays.
OTOH, we may be overthinking it.

At the very least, there might be only one or perhaps two other women aiding and abetting - the mother(s) of the children who conceived in the usual way who are just keeping quiet. No IVF or turkey baster involved.

Or the whole business is just a pack of lies/fantasy generated by the Harkles & Doria.
New Harry Markle up:
https://harrymarkle.wordpress.com/2024/04/28/the-jamscam-and-a-polo-hustling-project/
Maneki Neko

You are right about the word bastard. The children are innocent in all this. The real and true bastards are Harry and his wife when they don't give a damn how the world discusses about their tots' genetics.

Of course it's the jam, the lemons and the dead flowers and the stupid bowls are just so hilariously stupid that I laughed at the baronesses' showing off antics.
Sandie said…
This is from X, and it is weird in so many different ways:

Daily Times Nigeria
@DailyTimesNGR
The Defence Headquarters ( DHQ) has expressed its honour and delight for the acceptance of the Duke of Duchess, His Royal Highness Prince Harry and his wife, the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan to visit Nigeria in May, 2024.
----------
There is nothing on the DHQ official X account about this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8vq9wu25Rw
Harry wants Meghan to be QUEEN, Angela Levin reveals

I'd seen reference to the video but this is the first time I've come across it. So here it is for anyone else who might have missed it.
Sandie said…
https://youtu.be/5EwQc-DkuKI?si=ASDgODNCF28uG4_X

The Body Language Guy talks about Doria's interview in the mockumentary. I think he misses a lot of nuances in her body language, but it is nonetheless a very interesting analysis.

She never seemed to identify as a black woman, although her IG records indicate that in her adulthood she did make some kind of exploration, especially as she reconnected with her mother. She was keen to embrace the victimhood narrative and racism was the perfect storyline, but perhaps she needed to find a reason why she was ultimately denied everything she demanded of the royal family (give me everything I demand, let me be top dog, stop any criticsm, speculation, or investigation of me, accept and affirm everything I say and do ...). If I remember correctly she also blamed her failure to succeed in getting A-list Hollywood roles to her race.

I also find it interesting that Doria claims to have tried to prepare her for racist discrimination. It comes across as sowing the seeds of victimhood although I am not sure how one would prepare a mixed race child to operate and succeed in a world where there is still racism.
Sandie said…
https://youtu.be/5EwQc-DkuKI?si=uA1q9Q1aENxEExA6

In case I forgot to provide a link.

Interesting that the royal family pointed out that all royal brides go through the same scrutiny and media hysteria, but her and her husband cannot accept that she is not special and exceptional. How can you accuse people of racism but also accuse them of not protecting you when they are actually colour blind in their treatment of you?

No matter what the cause of distress was, I think there was a lot of turmoil and distress in that relationship, and the royal family were unable to help, perhaps because they were two people too flawed to be able to be helped. I keep thinking of a toddler throwing a tantrum and then running away. Unless the toddler calms down, it is impossible to constructively help them, and if they run away, they add being unsafe to their problems. Offering the toddler sweets and toys and lots of attention every time they throw a tantrum and run away is not good parenting.
Maneki Neko said…
@Sandie

* 'blamed her failure to succeed in getting A-list Hollywood roles to her race'? But on her CV she identified as Caucasian or did she forget that? She can't have it both ways. She now believes the racism narrative and must be convinced it was always thus. Anyway, nothing is ever her fault, she doesn't have enough humility to recognise her lack of talent. Unfortunately, she's overplayed the victim and racism card.
Maneki Neko said…
@Sandie

You did mention that the Harkles were due to visit Nigeria and this is now in the UK press. 'Prince Harry and his wife Meghan will visit Nigeria in May for talks on the Invictus Games (The Independent). This has nothing to do with * but I suppose she can re/connect with her heritage - 42% in case anyone forgot. Reuters is reliable and mentions that H will return to Britain for Invictus 'before joining his wife Meghan on a visit to Nigeria'. This implies that * will fly straight to Nigeria. The DM adds that 'They will meet service members and their families and participate in 'traditional cultural activities', according to Nigerian media.' This will be the backdrop for the usual ill fitting, inappropriate clothing and centre stage/mike grabbing. I presume she won't lower herself to fly commercial with the hoi polloi if she can find a mug to lend her his/her private plane.
Maneki Neko said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sandie said…
https://archive.ph/2024.04.28-182415/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13359723/harry-meghan-nigeria-visit-unofficial-royal-tour.html

DM has the story of the visit to Nigeria. It is most odd.

It seems that the invitation has come via the Invictus Games, hence the military connection. However, Nigeria is a Commonwealth country (but since independence, many decades ago, has not had the British monarch as head of state), and so they should know that hapless and his wife are not representatives of the British monarchy and government, and are not supposed to use HRH.

Nigeria has a huge population, dozens of different languages, and a lot of wealth. The country is also home to the stereotypical scam/con artist, especially operating through the Internet. There are also many royal families and princes in Nigeria. (In Africa, royals are sometimes called chiefs and sometimes they are called kings/princes, depending on the custom of the particular tribe.)

They will get full-on security provided by the government in Nigeria. Maybe she will find a rich prince to invest in ARO, I say tongue in cheek!
Observant One said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sandie said…
Interesting that she makes sure she is front and centre for his IG appearances and polo activities, but won't go to the UK.

I think the visit to Nigeria is all about stroking egos, for everyone involved in the escapade. But the silver lining is we get to see some more public displays!

I suppose making a royal appearance in Nigeria is more important than making jam for ARO!

I also wonder if the York sisters will be persuaded to turn up for the IG event in the UK.

I will be bold enough to predict that she will fly private to Nigeria and unless he can get IG to fund his trip, he will fly commercial. There are super luxury hotels in Nigeria where they can stay, which will be funded by IG or the Nigerian government.
KnitWit said…
@SwampWoman, I am looking forward to my first colonoscopy. Tally-ho.

50 days of jam .... snoozefest. Besides, I thought all the celebrity types were on keto or gluten free or the drug/diet de jour.

Yummy Mummies are afraid of peanuts, so no pp&j for the kiddies.

It would be a riot if the K kids tasted nsnna Kris's fancy jam and didn't like it on their show. Kids are such entertaining to food critics.
VetusSacculi said…
@WBBM - thank you for the link to the video with Angela Levin re H wanting M to be queen. I will watch it through fully when I have time.

The mention of it did make me recall a video of H from a time long before he was associated with * - of course I can't find it now as I'm not sure what I'm looking for - but he was being interviewed after some engagement, it was in a sunny country, might have been around the time of a previous Jubilee, he looked quite young. What made me sit up was that he said he had posed a question to his country hosts about some general issue with the opening "what if your queen....[did something]? I realise I'm not describing this very well at all but it was a marker for me in highlighting that Harold may actually be educationally challenged. The context of the interview showed that underneath the posh voice and earnest diction, I really don't think he understands the world around us and that the family model he knows is unique to the UK. Could be a reason that he seems determined to pursue the half in/half out model despite having been refused at Sandringham. Did the Palace staffers not bother to explain any sort of modern history to him, or just give up?
Sandie said…
Someone in Reddit did it ... the list of those who have posted about the jam! My comments in brackets ...


Abigail Spencer - Comes across as a bit of a simpleton. Easily manipulated.

Nacho Figueras - Another simpleton. Impressed by Royalty. His wife is practically aristocratic so he likes to keep up.

Delfina Balquier - Can't figure this one out - she doesn't need Meghan. (Because she is the wife of her husband's friend? Not everyone is like TBW and regards every friendship and encounter as transactional. They don't seem to go in holiday or visit each other's homes so I think this overt display of friendship is mostly restricted to polo.)

Tracee Ellis Ross - Doing it for black solidarity.

Mindy Kaling - Will do anything to be noticed by mean girl, Meghan. Comes across as very insecure.

Tracy Robbins - Can't figure this one out - she doesn't need Meghan. (Her husband seems to be really invested in the duo and their Netflix deal, so maybe she is just being a supportive wife. Her post was the bare minimum. Maybe she does not see relationships as transactional, or maybe she really bought into the whole victim story, especially the racist claims.)

Kris Jenner - Doing it to be close to royalty.

Chrissy Teigen - loves to side with mean girls. That seems to be her schtick.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1cfxyog/the_people_who_received_jam_and_why_they_have/
Sandie said…
Speaking to Isabel Webster and Eamonn Holmes this morning (29th) Levin said: "Mike Tindall, who is the husband of Zara, the King's niece, has been given a high position to do something about the Invictus Games. "I think Harry is absolutely furious about this. It has been announced, but very quietly.

Mike Tindall, the husband of King Charles' niece Zara, has been appointed as a patron of the game event according to Angela Levin.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1cfwnke/angela_repeating_this_narrative_about_mike_and_ig/

I saw this on another post as well. Has Angela fallen for fake news? There is nothing about the Tindalls on the website.

----------
However, the following section is about how they use funds raised to help athletes beyond the games.

https://www.invictusgamesfoundation.org/news

Unfortunately, the duo use the games for photo ops, to get attention and to make meaningless word salad speeches. Even the documentary did not explore the breadth of what the IG does for wounded vets.

Here are some of H's comments about his school days:

(Of rugby) "...beautiful game, plus a good excuse to run into stuff very hard. Rugby let me indulge my rage. I simply didn't feel pain the way other boys did, which made me scary on a pitch."
https://www.hellomagazine.com/healthandbeauty/health-and-fitness/20230227165397/prince-harry-eton-sports-fitting-in/

`The Duke of Sussex admitted this much was true in 2015 during a tripe to Cape Town where he told school boys, "I didn't enjoy school at all [...] When I was at school I wanted to be the bad boy," per The New Zealand Herald'. 

`Of course, Harry being Harry, he also used the visit to land in a slight dig at his older brother, who is first in line to the throne. "If you've got an older brother that's not into gangs, that's a huge positive," he said. "Older brothers are supposedly the cool ones. I'm a younger brother, but I'm much cooler than my older brother." '

Read More: https://www.nickiswift.com/1142277/how-prince-harry-was-treated-in-school-was-much-different-than-prince-william/


According to https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/uk-news/royal-family-exam-results-gcse-15036875 H passed 11 `O-levels' ie Ordinary Level GCEs (General Certificate of Education). At first sight, that seems pretty impressive - except that by the time he sat his first public exam, GCEs no longer existed.

They had been replaced by GCSEs, General Certificate of Secondary Education, an attempt to reconcile 2 different systems. GCE & the CSE (Certificate of Secondary Education) for less able students. A good GCSE pass was equivalent to a O-Level pass but students could still get a GCSE `pass' on an abysmal performance. I've heard examiners in maths, for example, expostulating that students scoring less than 10% still getting a `pass' certificate for example - `over 90% wrong and I still had to pass him!'

In the old days, even sitting 9 or more GCEs was evidence of sound ability.
In H's case, those `GCE' passes would have had to have been GCSE grades (unless Eton entered students as `overseas' candidates for whom GCE still existed) but I suspect that, like his Afghanistan campaign medal, they are more like a `participation award' rather than evidence of any academic ability.

BTW There have been changes made to improve the situation re pass marks.
Humor Me said…
I think KCIii released the kraken according the Neil Sean.
TW going straight to Nigeria; KCIiI is ignoring her. And… Angels Levin reports Mike Timdall has been appointed to the Invictis Games.
I get the problems with stripping the titles; that said, I feel for William as he is going to be left with the clean up from the pair not paying attention.
Sandie said…
https://thecrownsofbritain.com/2024/04/01/royal-round-up-1st-april-2024/comment-page-1/#comments

The first post from Crowns Of Britain this year ... it starts off slow and somewhat serious but she soon gets into her stride and ... let the laughing begin.

(She does royal updates with a great deal of irreverence. She keeps most of the zingers for the captions.)
Sandie said…
@WBBM
Thanks for the explanation about the school certificates. I am familiar with the abbreviations but have never understood what the qualifications are, and did not know that the system had been changed in the past.

In my country he would have stayed in mainstream school until the end of Grade 9 (about age 15) and then gone to a FET college (further education and training) for three years. (As in mainstream schools, there are four compulsory subjects: Life Orientation, one Home Language, one First Additional Language, and either Mathematics or Mathematical Literacy; plus at least three optional subjects, which are mostly practical and linked to a specific career choice such as nursing, construction, accounting, agriculture, business studies and so on.) Sounds too demanding for him, doesn't it?
Maneki Neko said…
I fear there will be more twaddle written about * in Nigeria (DM)


''Nigeria welcomes our beloved daughter!' 'Excited' well-wishers say they 'can't wait' for Harry and Meghan to arrive in African nation after duchess said she was '43% Nigerian' in genealogy test

Nigerians are 'excited' to welcome their 'daughter' Meghan Markle for a royal visit with her husband next month after Prince Harry attends an event in London.

Social media users with links to the country said they were 'overwhelmed with joy' and promised a 'celebration' to welcome the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.'
......
This will be hyped up and * will lap up the attention. The Caucasian 'thespian' is now nearly half Nigerian. Cue overuse of bronzer. The reality is that this is not a royal visit as such, the duo are not working royals, and the visit is about Invictus but again, this will be hijacked by *. Perhaps she'll bake banana bread for her hosts or will give them a jar of her precious jam. At least she's not setting foot in Britain. Nigerians need to know that she couldn't give a toss about them, it's all about raising her profile.
How charming, the Nigerian minister of defence has named our hero prince the Duke of Duchess.

Is this just an innocent lapsus linguae or has the gentleman a deeper understanding of the gelded moron's situation at home?
Maneki Neko said…
I posted about Highgrove products last week and gave a link but completely missed two of their honeys, Highgrove Royal Orchard summer honey and Highgrove Royal Orchard spring honey. I must say Highgrove Royal Orchard has a better ring to it than the ersatz American Riviera Orchard. * tried to improve on the name.
"Every single time I see a camera,
every single time I hear a click,
every single time I see a flash,
it takes me back"

We all must be very grateful that Harry has found a true help against this agonising and excruciating pain he has suffered so long. As long as those cameras, clicks and flashes are lubricated with uncritical and unquestioning adoration and money, money, money all is well and Harry blooms and prospers!
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1cggzlc/heather_dorak_accepting_jam_as_payment_for_yoga/

Heather Dorak got jam jar number 7.

This is the weirdest marketing campaign I have ever seen. Everyone made assumptions that she is starting a business and is going to be mega successful. What if she is simply going to send branded gifts to select recipients to get attention?

Imagine if she actually had a business set up and products to launch with this jam marketing campaign. And if she launched a different product each week for a month. It would have been a good start.

By the way, what are these huge slices of toasted bread that all these influencers are using to showcase the bread? It seems to be sliced bread as well. Is this what standard bread looks like in America? Interesting. Here, our options are the pretty standard rectangular loaf of sliced bread, but we always have a variety of wholegrain options.

----------https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13363449/king-charles-quite-busy-meet-prince-harry-invictus.html

I am sure William and Catherine and their children are quite used to papa/grandpa being very busy and making the most of the time they do have with him.

If hapless wants to spend time with his father and for his children to do so, what he needs to do is get his assistant to co-ordinate time with his father's schedule. Hapless has plenty of leisure time so he can be flexible. Balmoral in the summer is probably ideal.
Teasmade said…
Old news: I am way behind in posts but unless I missed one: we do in fact have lemon curd in the US.
The baroness is not going to produce ANYTHING.

She is using idiot journalists to get her name in the papers. Those morons get an electric shock every time she publishes a new stupid idea and they all rush to write about her. That is all she needs.

She has invented a perpetual motion machine and she doesn't need to work with anything any more as long as she gets her daily fix with their help.
Maneki Neko said…
Ouch!

Meghan Markle 'wastes her potential' sending jams to celebrities while Sophie Duchess of Edinburgh visits Ukraine, royal expert claims

...

Prince Edward's wife, 59, bravely denounced Putin's forces for using rape as weapon of war as she became the first British royal to visit Ukraine since Russia's invasion in February 2022.

Meanwhile, the Duchess of Sussex, 42, is gearing up to launch her lifestyle brand American Riviera Orchard and has most recently sent pilates instructor Heather Dorak a sample of her 'kid-tested, mother-approved' preserve. ...

I hope * reads it and squirms. She could have done something similar had she stayed and be respected for it, instead of which she's left to resort to flogging jars of jam. How the mighty have fallen!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13366179/meghan-markle-duchess-edinburgh-ukraine-womens-rights.html
Hikari said…
So, Charles’ enterprise At Highgrove is called Royal Orchard.

Baroness of Banality christened her “brand” American Riviera Orchard because she was dying to call it American Royal Orchard but couldn’t. Rachel can’t innovate diddly squat… she can only be derivative AF.

The irony here is, Duchess Dummy could have had her own organic farm produce shop had she and Ginger Knob accepted Charles’ offer of the estate in Herefordshire. What short-sighted idiocy.
KnitWit said…
She could have traipsed around the estate while H was a working royal. No need for merching. She could do as much or as little as she wished. Stupid Ho.
Maneki Neko said…
@Hikari

It's only the two types of honey that are called Highgrove Royal Orchard. The rest, biscuits, jams etc care just called Highgrove. The labels are quite plain and unpretentious, no crowns, no calligaphy - unlike *'s jam - just somes leaves, a bird and so on with a picture of Highgrove House. All the jams are organic. I think * missed a trick there.

The website is clear and lists the ingredients
Cane Sugar*, Raspberries (39%)*, Blackberries (21%)*, Gelling Agent: Pectin.
*Denotes organic ingredient.
Prepared with 60g of fruit per 100g. Total sugar content: 65g per 100g.

I'd like to see how transparent the ARO website is. If I wanted some good jam, I know which one I'd order.

https://www.highgrovegardens.com/products/highgrove-organic-raspberry-and-blackberry-preserve

Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1ch43gg/blind_gossip_cdan_we_can_only_hope_this_is_true/

Enty at CDAN says one of the companies she approached to do business for ARO was not asked to sign a NDA and is now talking to a reporter.

----------
More gossip from a podcast called Juicy Scoop, hosted by Heather McDonald ... some highlights:

They are not living together and hapless is living in LA (I do not believe this.)

She has two nannies and hapless objects to this as him and his brother had one nanny.

The rest is about them grifting free holidays and rides on private jets, and how she tries to latch onto 'friends' for social climbing.

It's a long gossipy read!
Ian's Girl said…
Sandie, it looks like sourdough, but could be anything at all. The standard square sliced bread is very common here, too, probably the norm, but the bread aisle (at my Walmart anyway) has dozens and dozens of options, let alone the bakery section. And yes, lots of wholegrain options, too.

Surrogacy us being openly discussed on many sites, now; I do wonder if it's going to be confirmed.

If the grifters really did think they could share the Crown and split the monies from the Duchy of Cornwall, then I am completely on board with them faking the children. But surely that cannot be true? Can Harry really have believed the he and Nutmeg could also be King and Queen?! I can well believe they suggested the Duchy monies be split, but do we really believe he thought they'd be allowed to be co-King and Queen?!
Sandie said…
https://youtu.be/ppdN_HBUEpg?si=sv69Amdg4Cei0wVj

Another remote viewing mind probe done by Liz Cross a year ago when the Netflix mockumentary had just been released. Highlight: the titles will be gone by 2028. It is interesting to see how Charles and William view the situation and what they think of hapless and TBW.

In another session by Liz that I shared, she saw the duo separating and divorcing round about 2028 as well.
Sandie said…
Tarot: I checked the tarot for an ARO update ...

Wands: energy, positive or negative
Cups: love, emotions, pleasure
Swords: intellectual matters, but also sickness, depression, trouble, death
Disks: business matters, possessions, material success or failure

Path: Ace of Cups
Pretty obvious ... could say this is the direction she has chosen for this venture. Fertility, productiveness, beauty, pleasure and happiness.

Ahead: 8 of Swords
This is not good, but maybe predictable! Waste of energy in details causing neglect of more important things. Lack of persistence. Sheer, unforeseen bad luck. Restriction. Great care in some things counterbalanced by equal disorder in others.

Destination: The Aeon XX
Can be read as where she wants to end up or where she does end up. Final decision concerning the past. New current for the future. Always represents the taking of a definite step. (She believed that she could transform her life through this idea. Seems that may happen, but maybe not exactly how she imagined.)

Surrounds/environment: 10 of Cups
Seems like she gets emotional support for ARO, but she is also surrounded by dissipation. Pursuit of pleasure crowned with perfect success but incomplete. Matters arranged and settled as wished. Lasting success. Peacemaking and generosity. Dissipation, debauchery, pity, waste, stagnation.

Others: 3 of Wands
She is going to end up hiring someone and that person will do all the work! Established strength. Success after struggle. Pride and arrogance. Realization of hope. Nobility but also conceit.

Secret: Queen of Disks
Court cards represent actual people. A secret person behind the brand, or a woman significant to her life but who is a secret from her? A woman ambitious in useful directions, affectionate, kind, charming, timid, practical, quiet and domesticated. She can also be dull, servile, foolish, capricious, prone to debauch and moodiness.

Goal: The Magus I
What is her ultimate goal with ARO? Skill, wisdom, adriotness, elasticity, craft, cunning, deceit, theft, sometimes occult wisdom or power. Can also represent messages, business transactions, and at worst, learning or intelligence interfering with the matter in hand. (In short, this card represents transformation through juggling the four elements and controlling the creative force.)

Significant to the reading:

2 of Swords
Interesting as the first reading I did for ARO indicated that this venture could offer important life lessons for her, but the basic message of the card is balance in thoughts, the downside of which is being stuck in indecision and thus not acting. Contradictory characteristics in the same nature. Sacrifice and trouble giving birth to strength. Quarrel made up and peace restored but tension remaining. Pleasure after pain. Truth and untruth. Indecision. Actions sometimes selfish, sonetimes unselfish.

Ace of Disks
Basically she seeks power through material things and so she wants to build an empire of wealth. Idea of materal gain, power, labour, wealth, contentment, materiality in all senses.

5 of Cups
I keep seeing a major emotional disappointment. End of pleasure. Disturbance when least expected. Misfortune. Disappointment in love. Unkindness from friends. Loss of friendship. Treachery. Ill will. Sadness. Vain regret.
Sandie said…
Invictus Games Foundation 💛🖤
@WeAreInvictus
·
1h
The Invictus Games Foundation is pleased to announce that

✅Washington, DC, USA
✅Birmingham, UK

have been shortlisted to host the #InvictusGames in 2027.

https://twitter.com/WeAreInvictus

She will throw the mother of all tantrums if it is not Washington!
Sandie said…
Charles and Diana did an official visit to Nigeria in 1990. I wonder if TBW is aware of this and if the duo will try to make a connection? Photos (probably plenty more):

Arrival

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fc8.alamy.com%2Fcomp%2FB4W8RD%2Fprincess-diana-prince-charles-overseas-visits-nigeria-19-03-1990-B4W8RD.jpg&tbnid=TkN6VqtE5N56jM&vet=1&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.alamy.com%2Fstock-photo-princess-diana-prince-charles-overseas-visits-nigeria-19-03-1990-20224721.html&docid=dTieMn_6UP_FDM&w=929&h=1390&source=sh%2Fx%2Fim%2Fm1%2F2&kgs=350713996027d788&shem=abme%2Ctrie

Visiting a village and a hospital:

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F474x%2Fbd%2F28%2Fd3%2Fbd28d3cccf59ad53a4fdf1871a03860e.jpg&tbnid=t7EbIwIbVJL7GM&vet=1&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pinterest.com%2Fpin%2F19900317-diana-and-charles-visit-a-village-in-maiduguri-borno-nigeria--321303754641288775%2F&docid=jUkqB1RF0SUjLM&w=369&h=550&source=sh%2Fx%2Fim%2Fm1%2F2&kgs=b64900f120d05300&shem=abme%2Ctrie

Not sure what they did this day:

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FDEnfQUiVYAcA1UN.jpg&tbnid=ssVqY7v_fVwfBM&vet=1&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Ftournigeriang%2Fstatus%2F885484276262862849&docid=tZ838zb94DBVoM&w=300&h=404&itg=1&source=sh%2Fx%2Fim%2Fm1%2F2&kgs=f0ad2aaae6168ec2&shem=abme%2Ctrie

State banquet:

https://images.app.goo.gl/N3FjSa1sBrTAbDjq9

Magatha Mistie said…

Singalong🎤
Apologies:
Dusty Springfield/The Seekers
Island of Dreams

Aisle Fated

She trawls distant friends
putting jam on their faces
Trying to make it
but failing it seems
Her thoughts always plagued
with splits between races
Over the pond on her
vile isle of schemes
Pie in the sky, Minor bird
with clipped wing
Carrying forth
boy named Sue
Far, far away from the glad
thriving Crown
Thoughts they’ll carry
meghan who
Always she’ll wonder
why we don’t like her
As the Sceptered Isle ends her dreams…

SwampWoman said…
I don't see it. I don't know about Birmingham, UK, but Washington D.C. is really not a safe tourist destination now and hasn't been for some time. Aren't the majority of the participants from the UK and Europe? Why in the world subject them to the expense of the flight and accommodations in the US? I think that the safety situation will continue to deteriorate into the foreseeable future.

At this time, there are two United States of America. In one, the rule of law continues, property is secure, and constitutional rights are respected. In the other, violent criminals, many illegal aliens fleeing criminal prosecution in foreign countries, are released to re-offend with no bond. Victims have no constitutional rights unless they are pet project of the politicians then they have extra rights. If there is a 'non-violent crime' being committed, many police departments won't even send an officer to investigate. You're on your own. Washington D.C. belongs in the latter category of protecting the criminal perpetrators, not the victims.

That isn't even the main problem for Invictus IMO. The most important problem that I see is whether Invictus will be economically viable by 2027 with or without the grifting grifter (very expensive) figureheads. I would say most western countries are deeply deficit spending. There are serious unfunded pension and healthcare issues, aging demographics, and falling population. The detritus of Africa (Europe) or Central/South America and the Caribbean (USA) are more unfunded liabilities.
Sandie said…
https://web.archive.org/web/20240501205349/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/usshowbiz/article-13354199/Meghan-Markle-Netflix-cooking-filming-cannabis-farm.html

Her Netflix cooking show is being filmed on two locations and includes a crew of 50 people. The woman has the amazing ability to get people to spend a lot of money and hire a lot of people to indulge her.

----------
Meghan Markle will no doubt ooze a glossy image of groomed elegance for the camera while filming her much-anticipated cooking show for Netflix.

But the Duchess of Sussex, accompanied by a 50-strong film crew, may be struck by more than just the aroma of fresh baked goodies as she showcases her kitchen skills.

That's because one of the two shooting locations chosen for Meghan's show is a 14-acre cannabis farm.

As recently revealed by DailyMail.com, production is already under way.

Meghan, 42, has so far eschewed filming at the couple's expansive $14million Montecito mansion, despite having a professional chef's kitchen and instead borrowed a smaller yet still imposing 4,500 square foot home just two miles away for her first filming location.

The owners of the $5 million home are philanthropists Tom and Sherrie Cipolla.

But the farm chosen as the second shooting location is mired in controversy, as its owners have created a stink with neighbors over their very fragrant cash crop.
Girl with a Hat said…
https://twitter.com/withEyeWideShut/status/1784282665652207714

do you think this is Eugenie's son dressed up as Lilibet?
SwampWoman said…
Sandie said: But the farm chosen as the second shooting location is mired in controversy, as its owners have created a stink with neighbors over their very fragrant cash crop.

So, guess she's doing a show on marijuana edibles.
Hmm. Her ideas may be dead in the water but she clearly refuses to lie down. Especially when she is in receipt of philanthropic largesse. Wasn't it suppose to be the other way round, with her avowed intention of being the one to distribute assistance to those less fortunate than herself?

BTW can anyone enlighten me as to what is being cultivated behind the modest house of the philanthropists?
There's scepticism about*'s stated age but there's a photo on SMM that brings us back to the question of her `supermodel' height of 5'6":

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1chvdxt/the_first_time_i_realized_about_meghan/

She's in very flat shoes here and looks shorter than she claims. He was supposed to be 6'1 at this time - he's in trainers and there had been no mention of his manipulating his foot wear. In addition, he's not standing up straight but walking as if he's sagging at the knees, almost like a half-shut knife.

What do you think? Has she started to lose height already?
Hikari said…
WBBM,

“International Supermodel “Legs that go on for days” Markle includes her 4”heels in her “official” height. Go back to the infamous “Polo with Plastic Archie” when Rachel wore the olive green bivouac tent and was hailed as a style icon. She had flats on that day and if you compare her to hairy as they are leaving the match and looking tense, she looks very short and stumpy. I don’t think Doria is taller than 5’3” either, if Rachel were naturally 5’6”, she’d be at least 5’9” in the heels she favors And wouldn’t look so short next to Catherine.

.@Swampie

I’m wondering why Washington DC is even part of the discussion to host Invictus. Regardless of who their bellend patron is married to, Invictus is for UK and Commonwealth athletes primarily, isn’t it? Or at least Europeans. The United States has their own Warrior Games. If disabled American athletes living abroad want to compete in Invictus, that’s cool, but the US shouldn’t host. Apart from crime and traffic gridlock, scheduling venues would be a nightmare. Most of the events wouldn’t be in the district at all if it would have to be held in Maryland or Virginia. This boneheaded idea smells like it came straight from Harry’s wife. I do not understand why the Invictus leader ship caters so much to these idiots. They should’ve told her to get on his bike and push at least 2 cycles ago_ Even if that meant returning the monies from the real foundation. Now that he is not under the auspices of the royal family, he should be replaced. The Games have just become the Markle Fashion Disaster Parade. The Harkles are are putting Invictus into the ground.
1 – 200 of 657 Newer Newest

Popular posts from this blog

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

As Time Passes and We Get Older

 I started thinking about how time passes when reading some of the articles about the birthday.  It was interesting to think about it from the different points of view.  Besides, it kind of fits as a follow up the last post (the whole saga of can the two brothers reunite). So there is the requisite article about how he will be getting all kinds of money willed to him from his great-grandmother.  There were stories about Princess Anne as trustee (and not allowing earliest access to it all).  Whether or not any or all of this is true (there was money for him and/or other kids) has been debated with claims she actually died owing money with the Queen paying the debts to avoid scandal.  Don't know but I seem to remember that royal estates are shrouded from the public so we may not (ever) know. However, strange things like assisting in a book after repeated denials have popped up in legal papers so nothing is ever really predicable.   We are also seein...