Well, what do you think of the shot over the bow by Vanity Fair?
https://www.vanityfair.com/style/story/prince-harry-meghan-markle-cover-story-2025
One doesn't expect them to be "wild" about this story. And it is from the locals who perhaps really want to send a message to the couple about how their neighbors are viewed in a not positive light. Apparently unsigned notes are not dropped in the mailbox in that neighborhood any more (maybe Ring is a fear). I have not read it yet (apparently I now need a subscription) but perhaps the library has it.
However, the DM has some parts of it. And they dish.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14297853/Meghan-Markle-Harry-caregiver-reparenting-Montecito-claims-new-article.html
The DM has also had some prior articles clearly criticizing them in the showing up to hug and so on as the fires rage. Trauma Tourists and similar labels are being tossed in their directions. It wasn't like this (so public) at Uvalde that I remember. But I could be wrong.
What is interesting is that the articles are sticking more to them like oobleck. The articles start off with fresh news but now is starting to list all the other problematic history. This (trailing history as part of the print story) is becoming more and more of a trend.
So that's kind of new. Don't think it is "the" kraken but it comes off as a shift in the tide.
As a side note, think about what is a tourist (someone looking at something novel to their daily life, not at work, and possible on vacation or retired - not a steady job stopping their visit ... and transient - meaning not going to be there next week, next month or a year from now).
Hugs are nice but they do not put a roof over a family's head. Nor does it put food on their table. Or clothes on their back. Today. Tomorrow. Next week or even next month let alone a year from now. Make up is a nice thought but what if the kid hasn't eaten since yesterday? The sad me reads: the hotels and landlords are gouging families who are just trying to survive.
The cynical side notes that: the difference between real people trying to help and those who are cosplaying are that cosplayers show up with their camera. Apparently if there is not photo, there is no proof.
What is real help to these people in need?
Comments
This blog may or may not be the blog you are looking for. If not, we wish you well and hope you find what you are looking for.
Guidelines for this blog is as follows:
-Keep discussions on the Sussexes. Politics must be strictly related to their involvement. Off topic subjects are permissible but should be limited and are subject to the discretion of Mods.
-Be civil and courteous in discussions.
-Posters who are disruptive will not have their posts posted.
-Anonymous or unknown posts are not allowed.
-We know that some of this is not family friendly. It can be a fine line sometimes on the topics such as sex and sexuality. Try to lean towards family friendly (thanks).
-Profanity has not traditionally been a problem, so let's keep it that way.
-We never encourage vindictive or other harmful actions.
-Please try to keep the conspiracy theories down.
-Do not discuss the blog, blog history, or other posters.
-No personal attacks both direct and indirect.
-Please de-escalate "fights" by dropping the subject. (please drop us a message that someone is treading on your last nerve so we can be aware that this is a problem).
-Please remember that the focus of the blog is on others, not any individuals posting here. So if your name is not attached to something posted, please begin with the idea that what is written is not likely to be directed at you if it upsets you.
-Posts which may be deemed too many flat statements/too provocative or mean spirited may not posted on the blog.
-Remember that not every one who reads the posts is happy about what is posted here. Please do not give out personal information. Be safe.
-Your privacy matters.
-Remember that certain sites require prior approval for reuse such as Harry Markle. Please respect their request on how to handle it. Links to share is a great alternative.
Mods do their best to ensure the guidelines are met. However, lapses happen because moderating this blog is a 24/7 responsibility and we all have jobs and families (and laundry) to care for. If you see overlooked issues, please feel free to message us so we can address them.
Thank you again for all your patience and support.
Moderation on.
PhantasMadoria
Her eyes lit with burning embers
Megiana made sure haz remembers
Things that didn’t happen
were never said
Spectral speculation
disturbing the dead
All this con-jecture
best left in the past
But possession by smegma
ensured Di was cast…
'Several people underwent "long term therapy" or took extended breaks from work after working with the Duchess of Sussex on her podcast, Vanity Fair has claimed. The magazine recounts a source alleging that the strain Meghan put on her colleagues when things went wrong was "really, really, really awful" and "very painful". The allegations are contained in a lengthy profile of the Duke and Duchess marking the fifth anniversary of their departure from the UK.'
This is on the front page and is developed on page 3. Apparently, H is 'conveyed as a naïve, lonely figure who has failed to make any friends and is desperate to reconnect with his family'. . . . 'The Duke is said to have said: "I have very bad childhood trauma. Obviously. My mother was essentially murdered. What is it about me that didn't make me one of these bad guys?" '. . . Still playing the victim and convinced his mother was murdered. It would be interesting to hear William 's take on this.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2025/01/blind-items-revealed-1_17.html#disqus_thread
- mentions the paparazzi chase in 2023 - probably the NYC alleged chase in 3 mph traffic, but no mention of the city, or the circumstances and the author uses this incident to bolster Hairy's claim for security while in the UK
- includes Hairy's refusal to attend the wedding of the Duke of Westminster for reasons of security in the narrative. I'm not even sure that Hairy was invited and that if he were, that an awkward reunion with William, his brother, wasn't the real reason for the refusal
- mixes Hairy's accusation towards Camilla's and other courtiers of planting unfavourable stories about him with Hairy's suit against the Daily Mail for stories about him about pushing for adding security. I haven't really conveyed very well how the author uses both of these allegations to try to make Hairy's case more valid but it's more obvious when reading the VF article
This is just an analysis of approximately 5-10 paragraphs of the said article. I find this author very manipulative in trying to frame the entire situation differently than what we already know it is.
Lady C & Dan Wootton claim that Radar Online has effectively challenged the 'Orrible Couple to prove that the children are rightfully in line.
Will the supposed parents sue or say nothing?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1i51gvw/harry_meghans_archie_lili_surrogacy_issue_finally/
Lady C and Danny Wooton video - Meghan and Harry's surrogacy scandal must be addressed
Binfire of the Vanities
The original tale of
Vanity Fair
Featured Becky Sharp
a gold digging mare
There’s nothing fair
about mevains vanity
A modern day version
Meggy Sharpie…
@GWAH
God save the King
Harsh words from Lady C
Regarding progeny
Poor old Archie
whoever he may be
Time to expose
Di-version and her clown
All that matters
protecting the Crown…
Discurtstyous
Hollywood has turned
Megs has been burned
Hopes for QVC
calls not returned
Here’s a tip
when you’re causing a scene
Never, Ever, disrespect
our late Queen…
"If he (Trump) kicks that piece of shit(Hairy) out of the country I will personally load up some pack mules with chisels and dynamite and add his face to Mount Rushmore."
He said he'd rather be `ordinary' , though I can't think that he'd really have liked that.
.Ady C sounds quite sure and she is normally very guarded in what she says. First I've heard about a 'post Harry divorce book'. Have I missed anything or does anyone know more about it?
https://youtu.be/MJPmQfNJgSY?feature=shared