Loud noise about how Harry "won" a review of his protection status - although the article (DM so far) was that it may/was initiated by the Home Office.
Maybe? Maybe not.
One of the comments was that actually it was part of a periodic review to see if the safety status has changed. It's been, what, five years?
That would be logical. Status can change and therefore their interpretation of safe/not safe would need to be adjusted. Timing is good.
The comments are running heavily in the No, don't give him an upgrade. Hot and heavy there. But ... sometimes I like to read the opposite comments to see how they phrase/look at the world. And, how their supportive numbers are running. Only a fraction supportive when you compare to don't give in group. Vocal? yes. Massive? no.
Comments
This blog may or may not be the blog you are looking for. If not, we wish you well and hope you find what you are looking for.
Guidelines for this blog is as follows:
-Keep discussions on the Sussexes. Politics must be strictly related to their involvement. Off topic subjects are permissible but should be limited and are subject to the discretion of Mods.
-Be civil and courteous in discussions.
-Posters who are disruptive will not have their posts posted.
-Anonymous or unknown posts are not allowed.
-We know that some of this is not family friendly. It can be a fine line sometimes on the topics such as sex and sexuality. Try to lean towards family friendly (thanks).
-Profanity has not traditionally been a problem, so let's keep it that way.
-We never encourage vindictive or other harmful actions.
-Please try to keep the conspiracy theories down.
-Do not discuss the blog, blog history, or other posters.
-No personal attacks both direct and indirect.
-Please de-escalate "fights" by dropping the subject. (please drop us a message that someone is treading on your last nerve so we can be aware that this is a problem).
-Please remember that the focus of the blog is on others, not any individuals posting here. So if your name is not attached to something posted, please begin with the idea that what is written is not likely to be directed at you if it upsets you.
-Posts which may be deemed too many flat statements/too provocative or mean spirited may not posted on the blog.
-Remember that not every one who reads the posts is happy about what is posted here. Please do not give out personal information. Be safe.
-Your privacy matters.
-Remember that certain sites require prior approval for reuse such as Harry Markle. Please respect their request on how to handle it. Links to share is a great alternative.
Mods do their best to ensure the guidelines are met. However, lapses happen because moderating this blog is a 24/7 responsibility and we all have jobs and families (and laundry) to care for. If you see overlooked issues, please feel free to message us so we can address them.
Thank you again for all your patience and support.
Moderation on.
Here's the vital reference:
`Meghan Markle Is 'Unapologetic' About Demanding Kate's Level Of Respect, Insider Claims'
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/meghan-markle-unapologetic-about-demanding-kates-level-respect-insider-claims-1760555
NO!
Please continue to post with vigor, I love your comments and the vital links you provide. The same goes for all other Nutties: please continue to post, you are are a floating island of sanity in the mucky fetid waters that constitute the nightmare world of H & M and their sugars.
Plus the boxes visibly stored in the oven are icing on this cake of ridiculousness.
Why does every single thing she does have an off-kilter feeling to it, like she deliberately wants to push the world’s buttons?
Is she deliberate in her crazy-making, or is she helplessly pathetic? I don’t know.