Andrew has been arrested and the police are looking about. Not certain what could still be around but it is what it is.
What I wonder about is how this could open up the flood gates to how to handle the California bunch.
Thoughts?
Deadlines for responses have passed. Will they show? Won't they show? And, rumors of demands for money to cross hands to make appearances (new level of pay to play). Such drama. You would think this was a soap opera where every episode ends with a crazy cliff hanger story plot to drive the next installment. Sadly, I don't expect it to change any time soon either. No. For them, there appears to be way too much energy left in the will they, won't they to end it now even though everyone else is pretty much tired of it. Hardly something one can point to and claim that they are trying to reconcile with those who feel distressed about what was printed. Just noticed something: remember that talk of trying to reach out and reconcile after the book, etc.? It seems to have drifted away, hasn't it? Hmm. Interesting. I wonder if that is recognized as a total lost cause or just delayed into the summer (or fall) campaign (c...
Comments
This blog may or may not be the blog you are looking for. If not, we wish you well and hope you find what you are looking for.
Guidelines for this blog is as follows:
-Keep discussions on the Sussexes. Politics must be strictly related to their involvement. Off topic subjects are permissible but should be limited and are subject to the discretion of Mods.
-Be civil and courteous in discussions.
-Posters who are disruptive will not have their posts posted.
-Anonymous or unknown posts are not allowed.
-We know that some of this is not family friendly. It can be a fine line sometimes on the topics such as sex and sexuality. Try to lean towards family friendly (thanks).
-Profanity has not traditionally been a problem, so let's keep it that way.
-We never encourage vindictive or other harmful actions.
-Please try to keep the conspiracy theories down.
-Do not discuss the blog, blog history, or other posters.
-No personal attacks both direct and indirect.
-Please de-escalate "fights" by dropping the subject. (please drop us a message that someone is treading on your last nerve so we can be aware that this is a problem).
-Please remember that the focus of the blog is on others, not any individuals posting here. So if your name is not attached to something posted, please begin with the idea that what is written is not likely to be directed at you if it upsets you.
-Posts which may be deemed too many flat statements/too provocative or mean spirited may not posted on the blog.
-Remember that not every one who reads the posts is happy about what is posted here. Please do not give out personal information. Be safe.
-Your privacy matters.
-Remember that certain sites require prior approval for reuse such as Harry Markle. Please respect their request on how to handle it. Links to share is a great alternative.
Mods do their best to ensure the guidelines are met. However, lapses happen because moderating this blog is a 24/7 responsibility and we all have jobs and families (and laundry) to care for. If you see overlooked issues, please feel free to message us so we can address them.
Thank you again for all your patience and support.
Moderation is still on.
Do you think he bought Picasso`s or did Fergie replace the paintings furnished with the two homes by fakes and sold the originals?
Only click if you have a good sense of humour.
In April 2019, the Times had a bombshell story about what was happening behind the scenes at Kensington Palace and Buckingham Palace as courtiers tried to figure out what to do about Prince William and Kate on one side, and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex on the other side. There were multiple quotes and revelations in this piece which proved to be accurate. Not only accurate, but prescient about the real fear (within the palace) that they were simply going to lose Harry and Meghan’s star power if they didn’t properly manage them. Palace officials were talking openly about sending Harry and Meghan away, outside of the UK, but in an official capacity with some kind of title and job, like governor-general of Canada or Australia, or UK trade ambassadors. In Spare, Harry confirmed that those discussions took place as well. Within all of the “how do we harness the Sussexes’ rock-star power” discussions, there was Prince William, like a bump on a log, his insecurities front and center. A source told the Times: “People are telling William, ‘Don’t worry. Your influence will grow and Harry’s will fade.’ This is peak Harry.”
Within this same Times piece, sources confirmed that William had been “reaching out to senior figures in the media as he prepares for kingship and by the apparent decision of those same newspapers to side with the palace over Meghan and Harry by peddling the most negative coverage of the duchess’s relationship with her father, Thomas Markle.” One source said, “The danger to them is that Meghan is going to be bigger than Diana.” And that’s why William was 100% behind the effort to simply get Harry and Meghan out of the country: “In some ways it would suit William to get his brother out of the country for a few years and Meghan as far away as possible.” Well, obviously, Russell Myers’ new book, William & Catherine, has completely reimagined this royal history.
Eh, similar has come out of the Sussex camp before (think Scobie book which she did/didn't assist in) and other media pieces - how the people in the palace were quaking in their shoes about how powerful the Duo were and similar fear of them by members of the royal family. Really. Can you picture William or Catherine (or even Camilla) hiding behind a sofa crying because they are afraid of one or both? that somehow one or both now has more power? Contrast that with the image of Catherine in the golden dress? Not so scared.
Do I think that the palace tried to come up with ideas, things to do, places to stay for them? yes. I think they tried long and hard to come up with something to help them. So that would be "true". When you mix some truth with "this" is how I view things which does not match the reality of the others , it can sound very believable because you know this or that part is true ... so you might conclude that perhaps the rest "ought" to be equally true.
As for this making * sail even higher in the public than Diana - as above but note it is focused on her and not him. Besides how? how does negative about her father translate to sustained (read life long or close to life long) major historical legacy for the next multiple generations? (and who might want that? him? nah, but she might as it could strengthen a victim legacy .
Do I think William wanted they out of the country? well sorta as in hopes they might find something else to do, focus on far away and less meddling in his future life as he tries to keep all the plates spinning in a post King Charles world. I think he saw the potential for the future problems, maybe not in detail which we have seen so far. Decisive.